Home Author
Author

theparliamentnews.com

The Japanese yen strengthened sharply against the U.S. dollar after coordinated efforts by the United States and Japan to support the currency, marking one of the closest instances of currency coordination between the two countries in decades.

The yen closed at 157.40 per U.S. dollar on Friday, its strongest level since early May, after having traded near its weakest level since 1986 earlier in the week.

According to reports, the recovery was supported by direct purchases of the yen, communication between Japanese officials and currency-trading banks, and discussions between U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Japanese Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama. Bloomberg reported that Mr. Bessent viewed the yen as undervalued, while a Reuters photograph of his meeting notes included a reference to purchasing Japanese yen.

The coordinated action comes as Japan, the largest foreign holder of U.S. Treasury securities, faces pressure to support its currency. Currency intervention typically requires Japan to sell foreign currency assets, including U.S. Treasuries, to purchase yen.

Large-scale sales of U.S. Treasury securities could increase American government borrowing costs by pushing Treasury prices lower and bond yields higher. The development is significant as U.S. Treasury yields have risen in recent months, with the 30-year yield exceeding 5.2%, while a substantial share of U.S. government debt is due for refinancing over the coming year.

Analysts say that supporting the yen may also help limit the need for Japan to sell additional U.S. Treasury holdings, reducing potential pressure on U.S. financial markets while contributing to greater stability in global currency markets.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

New Delhi, July 31: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (IOCL) reported a consolidated net loss of ₹1,141 crore for the first quarter of FY27, despite recording higher revenue and continued growth in domestic fuel demand.

The company registered a 27% year-on-year increase in revenue, supported by improved refinery throughput and higher fuel sales. However, the rise in global crude oil prices increased input costs, resulting in lower marketing margins during the quarter.

As crude procurement costs rose, retail fuel prices did not increase proportionately, reducing profitability on petrol, diesel and LPG sales. The results indicate that while demand for petroleum products remained strong, higher operating costs weighed on earnings.

IOCL’s performance also reflects broader trends in India’s energy sector. As the country imports a significant share of its crude oil requirements, fluctuations in international crude prices continue to influence the financial performance of oil marketing companies.

The quarter also highlights the role of government policies in the fuel sector. Pricing decisions and compensation mechanisms, including support related to LPG, remain important factors affecting the financial position of public sector oil marketing companies.

Market participants will continue to monitor global crude oil prices, domestic fuel pricing decisions, marketing margin recovery, government policy measures, exchange rate movements and upcoming earnings from other oil marketing companies to assess the sector’s outlook in the coming quarters.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Monsoon Session 2026

New Delhi, July 29: The Lok Sabha on Wednesday passed the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026, introducing stricter penalties and new enforcement measures aimed at tackling examination malpractice following the NEET UG 2026 paper leak controversy.

The Bill increases the maximum penalty for organised examination fraud from ₹1 crore under the 2024 law to ₹10 crore. It also extends the debarment period for service providers involved in unfair practices from four years to eight years and authorises the Central Government to establish a special task force to investigate offences.

The legislation requires investigations to be completed within two months and trials within three months after filing of the charge sheet. It also provides for the designation of Special Fast Track Courts in every State and Union Territory for speedy disposal of cases.

However, legislative analyses have noted implementation challenges. According to PRS Legislative Research, the Bill does not specify consequences if investigation timelines are not met. It also notes that the Supreme Court has previously observed that criminal proceedings should not be terminated solely because prescribed timelines are exceeded.

Existing Fast Track Special Courts continue to face significant case backlogs. As of April 2026, 775 Fast Track Special Courts, including 398 exclusive POCSO courts, were operational with more than two lakh pending cases. Data presented in the Rajya Sabha indicated that pending cases increased from over 2.02 lakh in 2023 to 2.45 lakh in 2025.

The analysis also highlighted that more than 40% of investigations under similar laws remained pending for over six months in 2024 despite statutory timelines. Delays have been attributed to factors including shortage of courts and staff, non-appearance of accused or witnesses, repeated adjournments, and case management challenges.

The Amendment Bill follows the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024, enacted after earlier examination leak controversies. According to the analysis, no convictions have been secured under the 2024 Act so far.

The government has stated that the Amendment Bill aims to strengthen the legal framework against organised examination fraud and improve the integrity of public examinations.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

New Delhi, July 28: Proceedings in the Rajya Sabha remained stalled for the sixth consecutive day of the Monsoon Session on Monday after repeated protests by Opposition members demanding an apology from Union Home Minister Amit Shah over the police action against students protesting the alleged NEET paper leak.

The House was unable to transact scheduled business, including consideration of the Prevention of Insults to National Honour (Amendment) Bill, 2026, as Opposition MPs continued raising slogans and pressing for a statement from the Home Minister.

When the House reconvened in the afternoon, Minister of State for Home Nityanand Rai moved the Bill for consideration despite objections from Opposition members, including Pramod Tiwari, John Brittas, and Tiruchi Siva. The Deputy Chairman rejected the points of order raised by the members, but continued protests forced repeated adjournments.

Later in the day, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju urged the Congress and other Opposition parties to participate in discussions on the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026, stating that the government was prepared to debate the issue of examination paper leaks. He said the legislation was important for students and appealed to the Opposition to allow Parliament to function.

Responding on behalf of the Opposition, Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge said the Opposition was not opposed to a discussion but insisted that Home Minister Amit Shah should first make a statement in the House regarding the police action against the protesting students.

Earlier in the day, Rajya Sabha Chairman C.P. Radhakrishnan rejected multiple notices submitted under Rule 267 seeking to suspend the listed business and take up discussions on the issue. The rejection led to further protests, resulting in repeated adjournments before the House was finally adjourned for the day without conducting substantive business.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

New Delhi, July 26: Union Minister Pralhad Joshi on Sunday officially assumed charge as the Union Minister for Education at Kartavya Bhavan, a day after President Droupadi Murmu accepted the resignation of Dharmendra Pradhan from the Union Council of Ministers.

Mr. Joshi, who continues to hold the portfolios of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, and New and Renewable Energy, was entrusted with the additional responsibility of the Ministry of Education following the recommendation of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Dharmendra Pradhan resigned from the post on July 25, with his resignation accepted by the President under Article 75(2) of the Constitution of India, with immediate effect.

Following the change in leadership, Pralhad Joshi chaired a review meeting at the Ministry of Education to assess the implementation of ongoing schemes, programmes, and key initiatives. Minister of State for Education Jayant Chaudhary attended the meeting alongside senior officials.

The meeting was also attended by Dr. Vineet Joshi, Secretary, Department of Higher Education, T. K. Anil Kumar, Secretary, Department of School Education and Literacy, and other senior officers of the Ministry.

According to an official statement, the President assigned the additional charge of the Ministry of Education to Pralhad Joshi on the advice of the Prime Minister.

Dharmendra Pradhan’s resignation came amid nationwide student protests over the NEET paper leak controversy, which had intensified political pressure on the Union government. Protesters had demanded accountability from the Ministry of Education over alleged irregularities in the examination process.

With Pralhad Joshi taking charge, the Ministry is expected to continue reviewing ongoing education policies while addressing key issues related to examinations, higher education, and school education.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
parliament

New Delhi, July 23: For the second straight day, disruptions occurred in both Houses of Parliament as Opposition parties persisted in calling for discussions regarding the purported NEET paper leak, police actions against demonstrators in Delhi, and the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan. In the Rajya Sabha, the Opposition attempted to utilize Rule 267 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business to halt the scheduled proceedings of the day and focus on these matters.

The repeated references to Rule 267 during the ongoing Monsoon Session have brought renewed attention to one of the Rajya Sabha’s most significant procedural provisions. The rule provides a mechanism for setting aside the House’s scheduled agenda in exceptional circumstances, subject to the approval of the Chairman.

What is Rule 267?

Rule 267 is a special procedural provision available only in the Rajya Sabha. It allows any member, with the consent of the Chairman, to move a motion seeking the suspension of a rule governing the day’s listed business. If the motion is admitted and approved by the House, the scheduled agenda may be set aside temporarily to enable discussion on a matter considered to be of urgent public importance.

The provision is intended for exceptional situations rather than routine parliamentary business. It cannot be invoked where another specific rule already provides a mechanism for suspending proceedings under a particular chapter of the Rules. The Chairman exercises complete discretion in deciding whether a notice submitted under Rule 267 should be admitted.

Why Did the Opposition Seek Rule 267?

The Opposition submitted notices under Rule 267 on July 22, arguing that the alleged NEET paper leak, the reported police action against protesters in Delhi, and the demand for the Education Minister’s resignation required immediate parliamentary discussion before any other business.

Leader of the Opposition in the Rajya Sabha, Mallikarjun Kharge, urged the Chair to allow a debate under Rule 267, stating that the issues were matters of urgent public importance and deserved priority over the scheduled agenda.

The government maintained that it was prepared to discuss the issues but argued that the debate should take place under the normal rules of parliamentary procedure instead of suspending the House’s listed business.

Continued Deadlock in Parliament

The procedural disagreement continued on July 23, with repeated protests by Opposition members disrupting proceedings in the Rajya Sabha. Members insisted that discussions on the NEET paper leak, police action against protesters, and the Education Minister’s resignation be taken up before any legislative business.

As the Rule 267 notices were not admitted, the House witnessed repeated adjournments and was eventually adjourned for the day without transacting substantial business.

Similar scenes unfolded in the Lok Sabha, where Opposition members protested in the Well of the House while demanding immediate discussions on the same issues. The government accused the Opposition of disrupting parliamentary functioning despite its stated willingness to hold discussions through the regular procedural framework.

How Often Has Rule 267 Been Used?

Rule 267 has historically been invoked only in exceptional circumstances. Parliamentary records indicate that the provision was admitted only 11 times between 1990 and 2016, highlighting its limited use.

Among the notable instances was the debate on the Union government’s demonetisation decision in November 2016, when the Rajya Sabha suspended its scheduled business to discuss the issue. Another significant occasion occurred in April 2015, when the House invoked Rule 267 to debate the agrarian crisis and issues affecting farmers.

Although notices under Rule 267 are submitted frequently during contentious parliamentary sessions, they are rarely admitted by the Chair.

Is There a Similar Rule in the Lok Sabha?

The Lok Sabha does not have a direct equivalent to Rule 267. Instead, members may seek discussion on urgent matters through procedural devices such as Adjournment Motions, governed by Rules 56 to 63 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the Lok Sabha.

The recent demand from the opposition regarding the NEET paper leak underscores the significance of Rule 267 in the Rajya Sabha’s procedural context. This rule allows members to call for the suspension of scheduled business to address pressing issues, though its invocation is typically at the Chairman’s discretion. The opposition’s reliance on Rule 267 reflects a strategic approach to elevate urgent matters within parliamentary discussions. Ultimately, while the Lok Sabha employs different mechanisms for addressing urgent issues, Rule 267 distinctly characterizes the Rajya Sabha’s procedural dynamics.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Simon Stiell

NEW DELHI, July 21: India has emerged as a “solar superpower” whose rapid expansion of renewable energy has strengthened economic growth, improved energy security and reduced dependence on fossil fuel imports, according to Simon Stiell, Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

Speaking in New Delhi during a three-day visit ahead of the COP31 climate conference, Stiell said India’s clean energy transition has become a key pillar of its development strategy and could serve as a model for other countries pursuing sustainable growth.

Addressing media and stakeholders after meetings with senior government officials and industry leaders, Stiell said India’s renewable energy achievements have delivered significant economic and environmental benefits.

“India is now a solar superpower that has turbocharged your economy, pushed up living standards and, along with other renewables, saved you US$18 billion in fossil fuel purchases last year alone,” he said, citing data from the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA).

According to Stiell, fossil-fuel-free power now accounts for nearly half of India’s installed electricity generation capacity, a target achieved five years ahead of schedule. He also noted that India’s installed solar capacity has increased more than fifty-fold since 2014, while domestic solar manufacturing capacity has expanded seventy-five times over the same period.

Stiell further said recent IRENA data indicates that India has become the world’s most cost-competitive solar power market, producing electricity at lower generation costs than any other major economy.

He credited the Government of India, industry and citizens for driving the country’s renewable energy transformation and highlighted the rapid expansion of India’s electric vehicle market, led by manufacturers including Tata Motors, Mahindra & Mahindra and JSW MG Motor India.

During his visit, Stiell held discussions with officials from the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, the Ministry of External Affairs and NITI Aayog. The meetings focused on India’s preparations for COP31, renewable energy deployment, electrification, climate finance and implementation of the Paris Agreement.

Stiell said the international climate agenda has entered a phase where implementation of existing commitments should take precedence over negotiating new ones. He noted that before the Paris Agreement, global warming projections were close to 5°C, while current projections are around 2.5°C, reflecting progress made through international cooperation.

“There is already enough agreed upon for countries to double down on implementation,” he said, adding that the success of COP31 would depend on governments translating existing climate commitments into concrete action.

He identified electricity grids, energy storage and electrification as key priorities for accelerating the global clean energy transition and said these issues are expected to feature prominently during COP31 discussions.

On climate finance, Stiell reiterated that developed countries should fulfil their commitments to increase adaptation finance and work towards mobilising US$300 billion annually by 2035 as part of a broader pathway to US$1.3 trillion a year for developing countries.

Referring to the increasing effects of climate change, he said extreme heat, droughts, wildfires and changing weather patterns are affecting countries across the world, highlighting the need for faster investment in clean energy and climate resilience.

Describing India as “an important voice” in global climate negotiations, Stiell said the country’s experience in renewable energy deployment and electrification offers valuable lessons for developing economies as preparations continue for COP31.

Why it matters

India has significantly expanded its renewable energy capacity over the past decade as part of its broader energy transition strategy. The UN climate chief’s remarks highlight the country’s growing role in global clean energy deployment and climate diplomacy ahead of COP31, where implementation of existing climate commitments and climate finance are expected to be key priorities.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Monsoon Session Day 1

The Monsoon Session of Parliament began on 20 July 2026 with high expectations. The government entered the session hoping to push forward its legislative agenda, while the Opposition arrived determined to press for discussions on a series of contentious national issues. What followed was a day marked by repeated protests, multiple adjournments, and little legislative progress setting the tone for what could become one of the most closely watched parliamentary sessions of the year.

Ahead of the session, Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed the media outside Parliament, urging Members of Parliament across party lines to work together for a productive Monsoon Session. Stressing the importance of constructive debate, he highlighted India’s recent achievements in infrastructure, manufacturing, and other sectors while emphasizing that Parliament should remain focused on issues affecting citizens and national development.

The message was clear: the government wanted the session to begin with legislative business rather than political confrontation.

As soon as both Houses assembled, it became evident that the Opposition had different priorities.

Opposition MPs raised slogans and demanded immediate discussions on several issues they described as matters of urgent public importance. Their primary demands included a debate on the NEET controversy, allegations surrounding Ram Temple donations, and other political concerns that they argued deserved precedence over the government’s legislative agenda.

With members continuing their protests, normal proceedings could not begin as scheduled.

The Lok Sabha witnessed repeated interruptions almost immediately after convening. Appeals from the Chair for members to return to their seats had little effect as slogan-shouting continued. Question Hour and other scheduled business could not proceed, forcing the House to be adjourned multiple times throughout the day.

The Rajya Sabha experienced a similar situation. Repeated attempts to resume proceedings were met with fresh protests, leaving the Chair with little option but to adjourn the House as well.

By the end of the day, both Houses had lost valuable parliamentary time, and the government’s legislative agenda remained largely untouched.

While the repeated adjournments became the day’s headline, the disruptions were driven by deeper political disagreements.

The Opposition demanded a detailed discussion on the NEET issue, arguing that concerns surrounding the examination required immediate parliamentary attention. Several Opposition leaders called for accountability and sought a dedicated debate before the House moved on to other business.

Another issue raised during the protests related to allegations concerning donations collected for the Ram Temple. Opposition parties sought an official discussion on the matter, making it one of the central flashpoints of the day.

Questions surrounding delimitation, governance, and proposed legislative measures also featured prominently in the Opposition’s demands. Collectively, these issues shaped the confrontational atmosphere that prevailed throughout the session’s opening day.

Outside Parliament, Protests Continued

The political activity was not confined to the chambers of Parliament.

Demonstrations outside the Parliament complex added another dimension to the day’s events, with protesters voicing support for various Opposition demands. Security arrangements were strengthened as police managed crowds and restricted access near key entry points, underscoring the intensity of the political atmosphere beyond the House.

Day 1 highlighted the contrasting objectives of the two sides.

The government sought to begin the Monsoon Session by advancing its legislative programme and appealed for orderly debate. The Opposition, meanwhile, maintained that pressing national controversies required immediate discussion before any legislative business could move forward.

This difference in priorities resulted in a parliamentary stalemate, where neither side achieved its immediate objective.

The opening day of the Monsoon Session demonstrated that the coming weeks are likely to be politically charged. Rather than focusing on legislation, the first day became a contest over what Parliament’s priorities should be.

Repeated adjournments reflected not just procedural disruption but also the broader political contest between the government and the Opposition. As both sides remained firm in their positions, the likelihood of further confrontations in the days ahead appeared strong.

With several important Bills expected during the Monsoon Session and the Opposition showing no signs of backing down from its demands, the opening day’s events may only be the beginning of a larger parliamentary showdown.

Whether the government and the Opposition can find common ground or whether repeated disruptions continue to overshadow legislative business will shape not only the remainder of the session but also the broader political narrative in the weeks to come.

For now, Day 1 will be remembered less for the business Parliament conducted and more for the political battle that unfolded before any meaningful legislative work could begin.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Delhi Tightens Security Ahead of Monsoon Session and ‘Chalo Sansad’ March

Security arrangements have been significantly strengthened across the New Delhi district ahead of the Monsoon Session of Parliament, scheduled to begin on July 20, and the proposed “Chalo Sansad” march. According to police sources, the Delhi Police has deployed additional personnel, reinforced barricading, intensified surveillance, and increased vehicle checks at key entry points to keep law and order during the parliamentary session.

Officials said the preventive security deployment will remain in place throughout the Monsoon Session, which is scheduled to continue until August 13.

Enhanced Security Measures

Several entry points into the New Delhi district have been designated as high‑security zones with multi‑layered security arrangements. These measures include:

  • Multi‑layered barricading at strategic locations
  • Intensive vehicle checking at entry points
  • Enhanced CCTV surveillance
  • Anti‑sabotage inspections
  • Round‑the‑clock patrolling
  • Additional police pickets
  • Reserve security forces on standby
  • Deployment of rapid response teams

According to a senior police source, every vehicle entering the New Delhi district is undergoing thorough security screening as part of the preventive arrangements.

The official said additional security personnel have been deployed at key locations while surveillance has been increased in areas considered sensitive during the parliamentary session.

High‑Security Locations

Security has been reinforced around several important locations in the national capital, including:

  • Parliament Street
  • Central Vista
  • Jantar Mantar
  • Connaught Place
  • Shankar Chowk
  • Other key government installations in New Delhi

Authorities have also intensified monitoring across parts of Central Delhi and North Delhi to ensure public safety during the session.

Protest and Hunger Strike

The heightened security comes amid developments related to the proposed “Chalo Sansad” march organised by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP).

According to reports, CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke continued his indefinite hunger strike after activist Sonam Wangchuk was taken to Safdarjung Hospital on July 18.

From the hospital, Wangchuk reportedly appealed to supporters to participate in the planned march to Parliament on July 20.

Focus on Law and Order

Police officials have stated that the enhanced deployment is aimed at ensuring security during the parliamentary session and facilitating effective law enforcement in the national capital.

Authorities are expected to continue monitoring developments closely as Parliament convenes and public demonstrations are scheduled to take place in the city.

Key Points at a Glance

  • Monsoon Session: July 20 – August 13, 2026
  • Security Measures: Additional police deployment, vehicle checks, CCTV surveillance, barricading, anti‑sabotage inspections
  • High‑Security Areas: Parliament Street, Central Vista, Jantar Mantar, Connaught Place, Shankar Chowk
  • Proposed Event: “Chalo Sansad” march on July 20
  • Current Situation: Preventive security deployment to remain throughout the Parliament session

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
parliament

The upcoming Monsoon Session of Parliament, expected to commence in the last week of July, is likely to focus on an extensive legislative agenda, with five new bills and two pending bills expected to be taken up for consideration and passage, according to sources familiar with the proposed schedule.

The government is also expected to brief political parties on the legislative agenda during the customary all-party meeting ahead of the session.

Constitution Amendment Bills Not Yet on Tentative Agenda

According to sources, the tentative legislative agenda does not currently include any Constitution Amendment Bills.

There has been speculation regarding proposed constitutional amendments relating to delimitation and the Women’s Reservation framework. However, sources indicate that the government may proceed with such measures only after assessing the availability of the required two-thirds majority in Parliament.

Separately, there has also been discussion about possible Constitution Amendment Bills concerning the ‘One Nation, One Election’ proposal and provisions relating to elected representatives facing imprisonment. These proposals have not been included in the tentative agenda announced so far.

Pending Bills Expected to Return

Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026

One of the key pending legislations is the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026, which was introduced in the Lok Sabha on March 25, 2026.

The proposed amendments seek to strengthen transparency and oversight in the regulation of foreign contributions received by individuals and organisations in India.

The bill is expected to be taken up for discussion and passage during the Monsoon Session.

Viksit Bharat Education Establishment Bill, 2025

The Viksit Bharat Education Establishment Bill, 2025, introduced in December 2025, was referred to a Joint Committee of Parliament for detailed examination.

Further consideration of the bill is expected after the committee submits its report during the upcoming session.

New Bills Likely to Be Introduced

Among the proposed new legislations, two bills are expected to replace ordinances promulgated earlier.

Income Tax (Amendment) Bill, 2026

The proposed Income Tax (Amendment) Bill, 2026 will replace an earlier ordinance.

According to the government, the legislation aims to strengthen India’s sovereign debt market, improve market liquidity, attract global capital flows, and support financial stability amid global geopolitical uncertainties, volatile crude oil prices, and supply chain disruptions.

Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026

This bill seeks to increase the sanctioned strength of Supreme Court judges from 33 to 37, excluding the Chief Justice of India.

The proposed expansion is intended to help reduce the backlog of pending cases and improve the timely disposal of matters before the country’s highest court.

Registration of Births and Deaths (Amendment) Bill, 2026

The bill proposes amendments to Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969.

The objective is to introduce stricter and more streamlined procedures for the delayed registration of births and deaths.

Prevention of Insults to National Honour (Amendment) Bill, 2026

The proposed legislation seeks to amend the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971.

It aims to strengthen legal provisions concerning acts that disrespect national symbols or undermine national honour.

MSME Development (Amendment) Bill, 2026

The Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (Amendment) Bill, 2026 seeks to promote ease of doing business and trust-based regulation within the MSME sector.

The proposed amendments are expected to strengthen mechanisms for addressing delayed payments to MSMEs while providing greater implementation powers to state governments.

Supplementary Demands for Grants

Apart from legislative business, the government is also expected to present the Demands for Supplementary Grants for parliamentary discussion and approval.

Members of Parliament will debate and vote on the additional expenditure proposals as part of the government’s financial business during the session.

Session Expected to Be Legislatively Significant

The Monsoon Session is expected to feature discussions on economic reforms, judicial administration, education, governance, and regulatory changes affecting multiple sectors.

While the tentative legislative agenda provides an indication of the government’s priorities, the final List of Business will be released before the session begins and may be revised based on parliamentary requirements.

Key Bills at a Glance

  • Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026 (Pending)
  • Viksit Bharat Education Establishment Bill, 2025 (Pending)
  • Income Tax (Amendment) Bill, 2026
  • Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026
  • Registration of Births and Deaths (Amendment) Bill, 2026
  • Prevention of Insults to National Honour (Amendment) Bill, 2026
  • MSME Development (Amendment) Bill, 2026

Note: The above legislative agenda is based on information from sources. The final List of Business for the Monsoon Session will be confirmed by the Government before Parliament convenes.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts

Our News Portal

We provide accurate, balanced, and impartial coverage of national and international affairs, focusing on the activities and developments within the parliament and its surrounding political landscape. We aim to foster informed public discourse and promote transparency in governance through our news articles, features, and opinion pieces.

Newsletter

Laest News

@2023 – All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by The Parliament News

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
-
00:00
00:00
Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00