Category:

Featured

US Inflation Expected to Rise as Food and Gasoline Costs Increase

by theparliamentnews.com 15 October 2026

written by theparliamentnews.com

US consumer prices are expected to have increased in September, driven by higher gasoline and food costs, adding to concerns about household purchasing power ahead of the November 3 midterm elections. The upcoming Consumer Price Index (CPI) report is also likely to influence the Federal Reserve’s decision on whether to raise interest rates again this month.

Economists surveyed by Reuters expect the CPI to have risen 0.6% in September, compared with a 0.4% increase in August. Annual inflation is forecast to reach 3.6%, up from 3.4% in the previous month.

The anticipated rise comes amid weakening consumer sentiment and declining approval ratings for President Donald Trump. A Reuters/Ipsos poll reported that around 78% of Americans blamed Trump’s policies, including import tariffs and the US-Israeli war with Iran, for rising prices.

Food and Energy Costs Drive Inflation Concerns

Gasoline prices increased 7.1% in September, according to data from the US Energy Information Administration. Economists estimate that the increase could contribute approximately 0.3 percentage points to monthly CPI inflation.

Food prices are also expected to have risen by at least 0.2%, following two consecutive monthly increases of 0.1%.

These costs are particularly significant for households that spend a larger share of their income on essential goods and services. While inflation excluding food and energy is expected to moderate, consumers continue to face pressure from expenses they encounter regularly.

Sung Won Sohn, a finance and economics professor at Loyola Marymount University, said consumers pay close attention to food and energy prices because they affect everyday spending. He also noted that lower-income households are particularly exposed to these increases.

The divergence in economic conditions between higher-income households and those facing greater financial pressure is often described as a K-shaped economy. In this situation, different sections of the population experience different economic outcomes, with some benefiting from stronger financial conditions while others struggle with rising living costs.

Core Inflation May Show a More Moderate Increase

Core CPI, which excludes food and energy prices because of their volatility, is forecast to have increased 0.2% in September, compared with 0.3% in August. Annual core inflation is expected to reach 2.5%, up from 2.4%.

The projected monthly moderation may partly reflect the fading impact of a previous increase in mobile phone prices linked to service changes at AT&T. However, higher fees from other service providers could continue to influence the figures.

Airline fares are also expected to have risen as jet fuel prices increased, while rents may have recorded moderate gains. Goods prices are forecast to have risen marginally as the effects of import tariffs continue to work through the economy.

Despite the expected moderation in core inflation, economists warn that higher energy costs could gradually affect other sectors. Rising diesel prices may increase transportation and distribution expenses, potentially pushing up supermarket prices and other consumer costs.

The extent of this pass-through remains uncertain, but businesses could face further pressure if energy prices remain elevated.

Federal Reserve Faces a Difficult Policy Decision

The Federal Reserve raised its benchmark interest rate by 25 basis points in September, bringing the target range to 3.75%–4.00%. It was the first rate increase in three years, and policymakers indicated that additional increases could follow.

However, weaker-than-expected employment growth in September and cooler inflation readings from July and August have reduced expectations of another increase in October.

Financial markets had assigned an approximately 22% probability of a rate hike at the Federal Reserve’s October 27–28 meeting, according to the CME FedWatch Tool cited in the report.

Scott Anderson, chief US economist at BMO Capital Markets, said a monthly core CPI increase around 0.2% could support the Federal Reserve holding rates steady in October. He added that the figure would not resolve the debate over whether further increases would be necessary later.

Economists expect the central bank could raise rates again in December. The September inflation report will therefore be closely watched for signs of whether price pressures are broadening beyond food and energy.

Social Security Benefits Also in Focus

The inflation report is important for millions of retirees and other recipients of Social Security benefits because consumer price data helps determine annual cost-of-living adjustments.

The Social Security Administration uses the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers to calculate adjustments for Social Security and Supplemental Security Income benefits. The calculation compares data from the third quarter of the previous year with the third quarter of the current year.

The Senior Citizens League has projected a 3.5% cost-of-living adjustment for 2027, compared with 2.8% in 2026. Under that estimate, the average monthly retirement benefit would increase by $67.90 to $2,007.

The final adjustment will depend on the official calculation rather than the projection.

With household budgets under pressure, the September CPI report is expected to shape discussions around inflation, interest rates and the cost of living. The figures could also influence economic sentiment in the weeks before the US midterm elections, although their political impact will depend on how voters assess the broader economic situation.

15 October 2026 0 comment

Blog Education & Tech Featured World

Nobel Prize Recognises Economists Robert Hall and Michael Woodford

by theparliamentnews.com 13 October 2026

written by theparliamentnews.com

October 12: Understanding how people make financial decisions and how those choices affect the wider economy remains a central challenge for economists. Household spending, business investment and expectations about future economic conditions can influence inflation, employment and growth. The research of American economists Robert E. Hall of Stanford University and Michael Woodford of Columbia University explores these connections and their implications for economic policy.

Their work examines how individual behaviour influences broader economic outcomes. While households decide how much to spend or save and businesses determine investment and pricing strategies, these decisions collectively shape economic activity. Understanding these relationships helps policymakers assess the causes of economic slowdowns and the potential effects of government and central bank interventions.

Robert E. Hall: Understanding Household Spending

Hall’s research has contributed to the understanding of how people make consumption and saving decisions based on their financial circumstances and expectations about the future. Household spending is influenced not only by current income but also by expected earnings, employment security and access to credit.

For instance, people who expect stable employment may continue spending on everyday needs and larger purchases. However, those concerned about job security or declining income may postpone purchases and save more, even before experiencing an actual financial setback.

When many households adopt similar behaviour, the consequences can extend across the economy. Reduced consumer spending can weaken business revenues, discourage investment and affect employment. These developments can further reduce household confidence, creating a cycle that makes an economic slowdown more difficult to reverse.

Hall’s work on consumption and the permanent-income hypothesis examines how expectations about long-term income influence spending decisions. It helps explain why temporary changes in income may have different effects on consumption depending on whether households believe those changes will persist.

These insights are relevant to economic policymaking because consumer behaviour can change before the full effects of an economic downturn appear in official data.

Michael Woodford: Why Expectations Matter

Woodford’s research focuses on monetary policy and the influence of expectations on economic activity. His work highlights that central banks affect the economy not only through their current interest-rate decisions but also through how people interpret their future intentions.

Interest rates influence borrowing costs, savings decisions and business investment. However, households and businesses also consider what interest rates and inflation might look like in the months and years ahead.

For example, if a central bank communicates a credible commitment to controlling inflation, businesses may take that information into account when setting prices, while households may adjust their spending and borrowing plans. If policy intentions are unclear, uncertainty can make financial planning more difficult.

This explains the importance of forward guidance, through which central banks communicate their expected policy direction. Such communication can influence economic decisions before any further change in interest rates takes place.

However, communication alone cannot guarantee a particular outcome. Unexpected economic developments, changing inflation pressures or declining confidence in policymakers can alter public expectations. The effectiveness of monetary policy therefore depends partly on whether its decisions and commitments are considered credible.

How Individual Choices Affect the Economy

The connection between household behaviour and monetary policy becomes clearer when individual decisions are considered collectively.

When consumers reduce spending, businesses may face weaker demand and respond by cutting production, delaying expansion or adjusting prices. If these changes affect employment and wages, households may become more cautious about their finances, further reducing economic activity.

Central banks attempt to influence these conditions through monetary policy, including adjustments to interest rates. Lower rates can encourage borrowing and investment, while higher rates can moderate demand and help control inflation. The results, however, depend on how households, businesses and financial institutions respond.

Economic conditions also vary across different groups. A household with substantial savings may respond differently to an interest-rate change than one relying on credit. Similarly, a large company with strong cash reserves may be less affected by borrowing costs than a small business that depends on bank loans.

Recognising these differences helps economists understand why the same policy can produce varied results across the economy.

Implications for Governments and Central Banks

The relationship between individual decisions and broader economic outcomes has important implications for policymakers.

Governments designing tax measures, public spending programmes or financial assistance need to consider how these decisions may influence household consumption and business investment. Central banks must assess how interest-rate changes affect inflation, employment, credit demand and economic growth.

Timing is another important consideration. Financial markets may react quickly to a policy announcement, while changes in household spending and business investment can take longer to emerge. Policymakers must therefore evaluate both immediate responses and longer-term effects.

Economic models provide a framework for examining these relationships and comparing possible policy outcomes. However, they cannot account for every unexpected development. Geopolitical tensions, energy-price changes and sudden shifts in confidence can influence behaviour in ways that are difficult to predict precisely.

Reliable economic data, careful analysis and clear communication remain essential for responding to these uncertainties.

The Wider Significance of Their Research

Hall’s and Woodford’s work highlights the importance of understanding how individual decisions interact with economic policy. Consumer confidence, expected income, future interest rates and business expectations can all influence the direction of economic activity.

For policymakers, the challenge is to account for these responses when addressing inflation, supporting employment and maintaining economic growth. Policies must be evaluated not only by their immediate objectives but also by how people and businesses are likely to react.

The broader lesson is that economic stability depends on more than government decisions or central bank actions alone. It also depends on how those decisions influence expectations and shape behaviour throughout the economy. Understanding these connections provides economists with a stronger basis for evaluating policy choices and responding to changing economic conditions.

13 October 2026 0 comment

Blog Education & Tech Featured technology World

US Immigration Crackdown Targets Major Technology Firms and Indian IT Workers

by theparliamentnews.com 9 October 2026

written by theparliamentnews.com

The United States has suspended eight major technology and IT services companies from its employment-based green card certification programme, affecting firms including Infosys, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), Wipro, HCL Technologies, Cognizant, Capgemini, Microsoft and Adobe. The Trump administration said the decision was part of a broader effort to investigate alleged misuse of employment-based immigration programmes and prioritise hiring American workers.

US Labour Secretary Keith Sonderling announced the suspension alongside Vice President JD Vance. The Department of Labour said it would stop accepting new permanent labour certification applications involving the named companies and would not process their pending applications. The move places additional restrictions on a pathway commonly used by skilled foreign professionals seeking permanent residency in the country. .

What triggered the US action?

The administration has accused some employers of exploiting foreign-worker visa programmes while reducing employment opportunities for American workers. Officials cited concerns about hiring practices, alleged fraud and the use of foreign labour following layoffs in the United States.

Vance specifically criticised Microsoft’s employment practices, linking the company’s workforce reductions with its use of foreign-worker visas. He argued that companies operating in the US should prioritise American workers when filling positions.

Microsoft disputed the broader characterisation of its visa practices. According to the company’s statement cited in the supplied report, around 80% of its approximately 6,000 H-1B applications in its previous fiscal year involved extending or changing the status of existing employees rather than hiring new workers. The company also said the remaining applications covered individuals already legally present in the United States who chose to join it.

Microsoft maintained that its H-1B petitions were filed for workers who met the programme’s requirements and that its compensation practices were competitive.

The allegations against the companies remain distinct from a final finding of wrongdoing. The suspension comes amid heightened federal scrutiny of employment-based immigration, with the administration seeking to strengthen enforcement and increase domestic hiring.

Understanding the PERM programme

The Permanent Labour Certification Programme, commonly known as PERM, is administered by the US Department of Labour. It generally requires an employer sponsoring a foreign worker for a qualifying permanent position to demonstrate that there are not sufficient qualified, willing and available American workers for the job and that employing the foreign worker will not adversely affect the wages and working conditions of similarly employed US workers.

PERM is an important stage in many employer-sponsored employment-based green card cases. A green card grants lawful permanent resident status in the United States.

The programme is separate from the H-1B visa system, which allows eligible US employers to employ foreign professionals in qualifying specialty occupations, subject to applicable requirements.

The latest decision does not amount to a blanket cancellation of H-1B visas held by employees of the affected companies. Instead, it restricts their ability to proceed with new and pending PERM labour-certification applications. The consequences for individual employees will depend on their immigration status, the stage of their green card application and the availability of other lawful options.

Why Indian IT professionals could be affected

The decision is particularly relevant to Indian professionals because several of the affected companies have substantial US operations and employ skilled workers across technology consulting, software development, engineering and business services.

For employees pursuing employer-sponsored permanent residency, the suspension could delay or interrupt an important stage of the process. Such uncertainty may affect decisions about long-term employment, family arrangements and career planning in the United States.

The implications could also extend to employers. Companies may need to review their immigration processes, assess the status of affected employees and consider how restrictions on permanent residency sponsorship could influence recruitment and retention.

However, the scale of the eventual impact will depend on how long the suspension remains in place, the outcome of federal investigations and whether the companies can resume certification applications.

The action also comes as Indian technology companies increasingly expand local hiring in the US. Industry representatives have argued that skilled-worker mobility and permanent immigration should be considered separately because businesses rely on international talent to fill specialised roles and support client operations.

Nasscom highlights the distinction between immigration and talent mobility

The National Association of Software and Service Companies (Nasscom) said immigration and skilled talent mobility should not be treated as the same issue.

The industry body noted that the H-1B programme has historically helped US businesses address short-term skill shortages. It also said Indian technology companies have reduced their dependence on H-1B visas in recent years while expanding their local workforce in the United States.

Indian IT firms provide technology services to major US companies and support their operations across several industries. Restrictions on employment-based immigration could therefore raise questions about how businesses balance domestic hiring requirements with access to specialised international talent.

What happens next?

The immediate uncertainty concerns the duration and scope of the PERM restrictions and the progress of the investigations cited by US officials. Employees whose green card cases depend on the programme may need to assess their individual circumstances with qualified immigration advisers.

For Indian IT companies, the development adds another regulatory challenge in a market that remains important for their international business. The longer-term effects will depend on enforcement decisions, possible changes to immigration rules and how employers adapt their recruitment and retention strategies.

The suspension reflects the Trump administration’s stronger emphasis on domestic hiring and scrutiny of foreign-worker programmes. At the same time, it raises broader questions about the relationship between immigration policy, technology-sector staffing and the movement of skilled professionals across borders.

9 October 2026 0 comment

Blog Business Featured India

RBI Raises Repo Rate to 5.5% as Inflation Risks Return

by theparliamentnews.com 8 October 2026

written by theparliamentnews.com

New Delhi: The Reserve Bank of India’s decision to raise the repo rate by 25 basis points to 5.5% marks a shift in the direction of India’s monetary policy. After years of relatively accommodative conditions and a rate-cut cycle that began in 2025, the RBI has moved back towards tightening as inflationary pressures and global uncertainties become more difficult to ignore.

The significance of the decision goes beyond the quarter-point increase itself. It signals that the central bank is becoming more cautious about the balance between growth and inflation at a time when energy prices, geopolitical tensions and external risks could put renewed pressure on household and business costs.

The immediate trigger is the return of inflationary pressure. Retail inflation increased to 4.82% in August from 4.45% in July, while the continuing crisis in West Asia has added another layer of uncertainty to global energy markets. For an economy that remains heavily dependent on imported crude oil, a sustained increase in energy costs can feed into transportation, manufacturing and consumer prices.

That makes inflation management particularly important for the RBI. Allowing price pressures to become entrenched could eventually require more aggressive monetary tightening, potentially creating a larger impact on economic growth. A measured increase now can therefore be viewed as an attempt to prevent inflation risks from becoming more persistent.

Credit Is Likely to Become More Expensive

The most visible impact of the rate hike will be on the cost of borrowing.

Banks do not necessarily pass on a repo rate increase immediately or in full, but lending rates can gradually adjust as monetary transmission takes place. That means new borrowers could face higher interest costs, while some existing borrowers with floating-rate loans may see their EMIs rise or their repayment period increase.

Home loans and vehicle loans are likely to attract particular attention because even a relatively small change in interest rates can have a significant effect over long repayment periods. Businesses dependent on bank financing could also face a higher cost of capital.

The transmission, however, is unlikely to happen overnight. The RBI has indicated that changes in policy rates typically take time to work through the financial system. This means the full effect of the latest decision could emerge over several months rather than immediately.

The Bigger Question Is Credit Growth

India enters this tightening phase with relatively strong credit growth. Bank credit has been expanding at more than 18%, considerably above its longer-term average of around 12–14%.

That creates a delicate policy challenge.

The RBI does not necessarily want to suppress lending. Strong credit growth supports consumption, investment and business expansion, all of which remain important for economic growth. At the same time, exceptionally rapid credit expansion can contribute to demand pressures and financial imbalances if it continues unchecked.

A moderate slowdown in credit growth may therefore not be viewed as a negative outcome. The objective is to bring credit expansion towards a more sustainable pace without disrupting the underlying economic recovery.

This is where the latest policy decision becomes more significant than the headline rate itself. The RBI appears to be attempting to cool excess demand while keeping the broader flow of credit intact.

Deposits Could Become More Important

Another consequence may emerge on the deposit side of the banking system.

Banks have so far had limited pressure to significantly increase deposit rates in an environment of relatively comfortable liquidity. But if credit demand remains strong while surplus liquidity gradually declines, banks may have to compete more actively for deposits.

That could eventually translate into better returns for savers, although the adjustment is likely to be gradual.

The RBI has also indicated that it prefers liquidity-management instruments such as variable-rate reverse repo operations and open market operations over using the cash reserve ratio as the primary tool for absorbing excess liquidity.

This suggests that the central bank is seeking to manage financial conditions without unnecessarily increasing the burden on banks.

Real Estate Faces a Short-Term Test

The housing market is another area where the impact of higher rates will be closely watched.

Higher home-loan costs can make buyers more cautious, particularly among price-sensitive first-time purchasers. Developers could also face somewhat higher financing costs.

However, the effect may not be enough to fundamentally change the long-term outlook for housing.

Demand in India’s real estate market is increasingly linked to rising incomes, urbanisation, infrastructure development and changing consumer preferences. These structural factors can continue supporting housing demand even when financing conditions become less favourable.

The likely outcome, therefore, may be moderation rather than a major disruption. Premium and financially stronger segments could prove more resilient, while highly leveraged buyers and developers may feel the pressure more quickly.

Growth Versus Inflation

The central issue for the RBI now is the familiar trade-off between growth and price stability.

Higher interest rates can restrain borrowing and demand, but keeping rates too low when inflation risks are rising could create a different problem. The challenge becomes more complicated when inflation is influenced by factors outside domestic monetary policy, such as crude oil prices and geopolitical disruptions.

India’s situation is therefore different from simply following the rate decisions of major global central banks. Domestic growth and inflation conditions remain the primary considerations, even though international developments increasingly affect India’s economic outlook.

The latest hike should consequently be viewed as a signal of caution rather than a declaration that India is entering a prolonged period of aggressive tightening.

For households, businesses and investors, the message is straightforward: the era of increasingly cheaper credit cannot be taken for granted. Borrowers may need to account for higher financing costs, while banks will have to balance strong credit demand with funding requirements.

For the wider economy, the success of the policy will depend on whether inflation can be contained without causing a sharp slowdown in consumption, investment and credit growth.

The RBI’s challenge now is not simply to raise rates. It is to find the point at which inflation is brought under control while India’s underlying growth momentum remains intact.

8 October 2026 0 comment

Blog Featured India World

India Calls for WTO Rules to Address Global Trade Distortions

by theparliamentnews.com 3 October 2026

written by theparliamentnews.com

India has called for global trade concerns, including production imbalances and possible market distortions, to be addressed within World Trade Organization (WTO) rules, with Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal stressing the need for evidence-based measures at the G20 Trade Ministers’ Meeting in Milwaukee, United States.

Addressing the concluding day of the meeting, Goyal said India recognised concerns among several countries over the impact of trade-distorting support on global markets. He said issues such as dumping and predatory pricing should be dealt with through established WTO mechanisms, including anti-dumping and countervailing duties, where supported by evidence and subject to judicial review.

Goyal distinguished between industrial capacity and trade distortion, saying that production capacity by itself should not be treated as a problem. According to him, distortions may emerge when production becomes concentrated in particular locations because of hidden subsidies or other forms of support.

He said efforts to diversify global production and supply chains could be legitimate, but such objectives should not be used to introduce measures outside WTO rules. He also stressed that developing countries should not be required to bear a disproportionate share of the adjustment and should retain sufficient policy space to build their industrial capacity.

The minister said India’s manufacturing base caters to both domestic and international demand. He described the country as a large domestic-demand-driven economy and said India was developing manufacturing value chains covering activities from design to finished products.

Goyal also rejected the characterisation of India as having structural excess capacity in the sectors identified by the G20 Presidency. He said India’s manufacturing expansion is linked to domestic requirements as well as its participation in international supply chains.

Another focus of Goyal’s intervention was the future of the multilateral trading system. He said India’s trade with G20 economies depends on a transparent, non-discriminatory and rules-based framework.

He highlighted the Most-Favoured-Nation principle as an important element of the WTO system, under which members generally extend the same trading terms to other WTO members. Goyal also stressed the importance of consensus-based decision-making and called for maintaining special and differential treatment for developing countries.

He further called for the restoration of the WTO’s two-tier dispute settlement system, which India has previously identified as important for the effective enforcement of multilateral trade rules.

Forced labour in global supply chains was another issue discussed during the meeting. Goyal said India’s commitment to eliminating forced labour was “absolute and unconditional”, while emphasising that trade-related action should be based on specific and verifiable evidence.

He said border measures should not be based on assumptions about entire countries, regions or sectors and should follow due process and WTO rules. India also supports voluntary cooperation among G20 members on eliminating forced labour, provided such cooperation does not create new obligations or become a basis for unilateral trade action.

Goyal pointed to India’s existing legal and policy framework on the issue, including its ratification of International Labour Organization Conventions 29 and 105. He also noted that India amended its Foreign Trade Policy in July 2026 to prohibit imports of goods produced using forced labour.

The Milwaukee meeting also provided an opportunity for India to engage bilaterally with other G20 members. Goyal held meetings with trade counterparts from Australia, Saudi Arabia, France, South Korea and Canada.

The minister reaffirmed India’s support for a fair, transparent, open, inclusive and non-discriminatory multilateral trading system with the WTO at its core. He also emphasised the importance of allowing developing economies sufficient policy space to pursue industrialisation, economic growth and food security.

The G20 Trade Ministers’ Meeting was held under the United States’ G20 Presidency. India’s participation focused on trade rules, production capacity, supply-chain issues, labour standards and the broader functioning of the multilateral trading system.

3 October 2026 0 comment

Blog Featured India

Gandhi Jayanti 2026: Why October 2 Remains a Day of Reflection

by theparliamentnews.com 2 October 2026

written by theparliamentnews.com

New Delhi, October 2, 2026: India is observing Gandhi Jayanti today, marking the 157th birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi. Across the country, the day is being observed through commemorative programmes and tributes, while a national Sarva-Dharma Prarthana is scheduled in New Delhi.

But October 2 carries significance beyond Gandhi’s birth anniversary. The United Nations also observes the date as the International Day of Non-Violence, giving the day a place on both India’s national calendar and the international calendar. The UN established the observance in 2007 to promote awareness of non-violence and a culture of peace, tolerance and understanding.

Gandhi was born on October 2, 1869, in Porbandar, Gujarat. He later became one of the central figures of India’s freedom movement, using non-violent resistance and civil disobedience as important methods of political mobilisation.

His approach was different from a conventional armed struggle. Campaigns associated with Gandhi sought to bring large numbers of ordinary people into the independence movement through methods including non-cooperation, peaceful protest and civil disobedience.

The Non-Cooperation Movement, the Salt March of 1930 and the Quit India Movement of 1942 became important chapters in the broader struggle against British rule. The Salt March, in particular, turned opposition to the British salt laws into a mass movement and became one of the most recognised episodes of the independence struggle.

The historical record of Gandhi and the freedom movement is extensive and has also been subject to different interpretations and debates. However, non-violence remained a defining element of Gandhi’s political method and public philosophy.

The international significance of October 2 developed decades after Gandhi’s death.

In June 2007, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution establishing October 2 as the International Day of Non-Violence. The resolution called for the message of non-violence to be spread through education and public awareness and reaffirmed the universal relevance of the principle.

The UN describes Gandhi as a pioneer of the philosophy and strategy of non-violence and notes that his approach has influenced movements for civil rights and social change around the world.

That gives October 2 a significance beyond the Indian independence story. The date is now used internationally to discuss peaceful methods of addressing social and political conflicts.

Non-violence, as used in Gandhi’s political campaigns, did not simply mean remaining passive in the face of injustice.

The UN’s explanation of non-violent action includes methods such as protest and persuasion, non-cooperation and non-violent intervention. Such methods seek political or social change without the use of physical violence.

Gandhi used these principles to encourage participation in India’s freedom movement. His campaigns demonstrated how boycotts, marches, civil disobedience and withdrawal of cooperation could become instruments of mass political action.

This distinction is important because Gandhi’s legacy is often reduced to a single word non-violence while his political strategy involved organised participation, resistance and public mobilisation.

In India, Gandhi Jayanti is marked through official ceremonies, prayer meetings and programmes in schools, institutions and communities. Raj Ghat in New Delhi, where Gandhi’s memorial is located, remains a major site for national tributes.

The 2026 observance also includes a Sarva-Dharma Prarthana in New Delhi, according to the Press Information Bureau.

At the international level, the United Nations continues to mark October 2 as the International Day of Non-Violence. In its 2026 message, UN Secretary-General António Guterres highlighted Gandhi’s example of pursuing change through peace and dialogue and linked the observance to the need to address division, conflict and human suffering through non-violent means.

For India, Gandhi Jayanti is closely connected to the country’s history of independence. For the wider international community, the date has become associated with the broader principle of non-violence.

The two observances overlap but are not identical. One remembers a major figure in India’s freedom struggle; the other uses his birth anniversary to promote a principle that the United Nations describes as having universal relevance.

That dual identity makes October 2 different from an ordinary commemorative date. It connects a specific chapter of Indian history with an international discussion about how societies respond to conflict, disagreement and injustice.

As India marks Gandhi Jayanti in 2026, the occasion therefore looks in two directions at once back at the freedom movement that shaped modern India and outward at the continuing global discussion around peace, dialogue and non-violent action.

2 October 2026 0 comment

Blog Featured India

Why India’s Strong GDP Growth Has Not Lifted the Stock Market

by theparliamentnews.com 30 September 2026

written by theparliamentnews.com

India’s economy continues to show resilience, with real GDP growth reaching 7.8% in the first quarter of FY27 and industrial production accelerating to 8% in August. However, the country’s stock market has faced significant pressure this year, creating a gap between economic performance and investor sentiment.

At first glance, the contrast may appear unusual. Strong economic growth is often associated with rising corporate activity and higher stock prices. However, economic growth and stock market performance measure different aspects of the economy.

GDP measures economic activity across the country, while stock prices reflect investors’ expectations about the future profitability of listed companies. Between economic growth and corporate earnings lie several factors that can influence market performance, including input costs, currency movements, interest rates and global financial conditions.

Economic Growth and Corporate Earnings

A growing economy does not automatically translate into higher profits for every listed company.

Businesses may benefit from stronger consumer demand, increased investment and expanding economic activity. However, rising operating costs can reduce the gains from higher sales.

Companies facing higher costs for raw materials, energy, transportation or financing may struggle to maintain profit margins if they cannot pass those increases on to consumers.

As a result, corporate earnings can weaken even when overall economic activity remains strong.

This distinction helps explain why investors may respond cautiously to positive GDP figures. Markets are influenced not only by the pace of economic growth but also by how that growth translates into future earnings.

Crude Oil and the Cost of Imports

Crude oil remains an important factor in India’s economic outlook because the country depends heavily on imported energy.

A sustained rise in global oil prices can increase India’s import bill, put pressure on the rupee and add to inflationary risks.

Higher energy costs can affect transportation, manufacturing and other business activities. Companies may face higher production expenses, while households may experience increased costs for fuel and other goods and services.

The distribution of these costs depends on the sector and the company’s ability to adjust prices. Businesses may absorb some of the increase through lower margins, while consumers or the government may bear part of the burden.

For investors, the concern is whether higher input costs could reduce corporate profitability and affect future earnings expectations.

Global Financial Conditions and Foreign Investment

Indian equities are also influenced by developments in international financial markets.

When US bond yields rise, investors may find government securities more attractive relative to riskier assets such as emerging-market equities.

This can influence the movement of foreign portfolio investments into and out of Indian markets.

Geopolitical uncertainty, currency fluctuations and changing expectations about global interest rates can add to these pressures.

A weaker rupee can increase the cost of imported inputs for Indian companies, although it may also benefit some exporters by improving the value of overseas earnings in domestic currency.

The overall effect depends on a company’s exposure to imports, exports, foreign-currency borrowing and international demand.

Why Strong Growth May Not Lift Stock Prices

Stock prices are shaped by expectations about the future rather than by current economic data alone.

If investors have already anticipated strong economic growth, the release of positive GDP figures may not be enough to push share prices higher.

Markets often respond to the difference between actual results and what investors had expected.

For example, a strong growth rate may still disappoint investors if they expected faster expansion, stronger corporate earnings or lower operating costs.

Valuations also matter. Even when a company reports healthy earnings, its share price may decline if investors believe those earnings do not justify the price at which the stock is trading.

This means that economic growth, corporate profitability and market valuations can move in different directions.

What Investors Are Watching

The divergence between economic growth and stock market performance highlights the importance of examining several indicators alongside GDP and industrial production.

Crude oil prices: Higher prices can increase import costs and put pressure on business margins.

Corporate earnings: Changes in earnings forecasts can provide insight into how companies are managing costs and demand.

The rupee: Currency movements affect import expenses, foreign-currency obligations and the value of overseas earnings.

Foreign investment flows: Portfolio movements can influence market liquidity and share prices.

Bond yields: Changes in domestic and international yields affect financing costs and the relative attractiveness of equities.

Market valuations: Share prices depend partly on how much investors are willing to pay for expected future earnings.

Together, these indicators provide a broader picture of the conditions influencing Indian equities.

The Broader Economic Picture

The apparent disconnect between India’s economy and its stock market does not necessarily indicate that one of them is misrepresenting economic conditions.

Strong GDP growth suggests that economic activity is expanding. Falling share prices may reflect concerns about corporate profitability, valuations or global financial conditions.

The two can coexist because the stock market represents expectations about listed companies rather than the entire economy.

For policymakers and businesses, the challenge is to sustain economic growth while managing inflation, energy costs and external financial pressures.

For investors, the focus extends beyond headline growth figures to the ability of companies to convert economic expansion into sustainable earnings.

Conclusion

India’s economic performance and stock market movements reflect different dimensions of the country’s financial and economic outlook.

The economy can continue to expand while listed companies face pressure from rising costs, currency movements and changing global conditions.

The central question is whether corporate earnings can keep pace with the costs, valuations and financial conditions investors are assessing.

Crude oil prices, earnings revisions, the rupee, foreign investment flows, bond yields and valuations therefore remain important indicators to monitor alongside GDP growth and industrial production.

30 September 2026 0 comment

Blog Featured Politics World

Trump–Xi Summit Offers Temporary Stability Amid US–China Rivalry

by theparliamentnews.com 26 September 2026

written by theparliamentnews.com

Washington, September 26: The meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in Washington has brought renewed attention to the future of US–China relations and their implications for the global strategic order. The summit resulted in a two-month extension of the existing trade truce, providing both countries additional time for negotiations. However, major disagreements over trade, technology and security remain unresolved.

For countries such as India, the significance of the meeting extends beyond tariffs and bilateral commerce. The relationship between Washington and Beijing increasingly influences developments in artificial intelligence, semiconductor technology, critical minerals, global supply chains and security across the Indo-Pacific.

The summit reflects an effort by both governments to manage competition and maintain communication without resolving their broader strategic differences.

A Trade Truce, Not a Permanent Settlement

The United States and China agreed to extend their existing trade truce by two months, until January 10, 2027. The arrangement gives both sides additional time to pursue negotiations on trade and economic cooperation.

The extension does not settle the broader disagreements over tariffs, Chinese purchases of American goods, rare-earth supplies and technology restrictions. These issues remain central to the economic relationship between the two countries.

The United States has an interest in maintaining access to critical minerals and rare earth supplies used in manufacturing and advanced technologies. China, meanwhile, has sought to avoid further tariff escalation while protecting its economic interests and technological ambitions.

Both countries have reasons to maintain economic stability. However, the extension of a temporary arrangement should not be interpreted as a permanent settlement.

The summit is therefore best understood as an effort to manage economic competition while negotiations continue.

Technology and Strategic Competition Remain Central

US–China competition extends well beyond conventional trade disputes. Artificial intelligence, semiconductor technology, military capabilities and critical supply chains have become central to the relationship.

Washington continues to pursue policies intended to protect its technological advantages and address concerns about China’s industrial and strategic influence. Beijing is seeking greater technological self-reliance and remains opposed to restrictions that it views as limiting its development.

These disagreements are difficult to resolve through conventional trade negotiations because they are increasingly linked to national security.

Maintaining communication between the two governments can help manage tensions, particularly where economic competition overlaps with military and technological concerns. However, diplomatic engagement alone does not guarantee a lasting resolution.

The Role of Great-Power Diplomacy

The summit also highlighted the importance of diplomatic symbolism in international relations.

The formal welcome and ceremonial events surrounding Xi’s Washington visit demonstrated the importance both governments attach to direct engagement. The visit provided an opportunity for the two leaders to present dialogue as a continuing feature of their relationship despite significant differences.

Such diplomatic gestures can influence how other countries interpret relations between Washington and Beijing. They may signal a willingness to manage disagreements, but they do not necessarily indicate a fundamental shift in strategic priorities.

For countries across Asia, the key question is whether bilateral diplomacy between the two largest powers will remain compatible with the interests of other regional states.

The G2 Question and India’s Strategic Position

The idea of a G2 world refers to an international system in which the United States and China become the principal powers shaping major global decisions.

Although no formal G2 arrangement has been established, closer coordination between Washington and Beijing raises questions about how other countries will be represented in discussions affecting their security and economic interests.

India has its own strategic priorities in the Indo-Pacific. Japan, Australia and Southeast Asian countries also maintain distinct relationships with both powers.

For New Delhi, the significance of the summit lies partly in whether the United States can engage China while continuing to recognise the interests of its regional partners.

India has developed cooperation with Washington in areas including defence, technology and supply-chain resilience. At the same time, it maintains its own relationships and strategic priorities.

A more stable US–China relationship could reduce the risk of uncontrolled confrontation. However, if major decisions affecting Asia are increasingly shaped through bilateral negotiations between Washington and Beijing, other countries may face challenges in protecting their interests.

Critical Minerals and Supply-Chain Resilience

Critical minerals and rare earth elements have become important components of the US–China relationship. These materials are used in electronics, electric vehicles, advanced manufacturing, defence systems and emerging technologies.

The concentration of supply chains creates vulnerabilities for countries and companies that depend heavily on a limited number of suppliers.

Any agreement that improves the reliability of critical-mineral supplies could ease immediate pressure on industries. At the same time, the concentration of production reinforces the importance of diversifying supply chains and developing alternative sources.

For India, this presents both an economic challenge and an opportunity.

Strengthening domestic manufacturing, developing critical-mineral processing capabilities and improving supply-chain resilience could help India participate more actively in global production networks. The extent of these opportunities will depend on investment, infrastructure, technology and access to international markets.

Artificial Intelligence and the Next Phase of Competition

Artificial intelligence is another area where Washington and Beijing’s interests overlap with wider questions of economic and national security.

Both countries are investing in AI development, computing infrastructure and advanced technologies. Their competition also involves access to semiconductors, research capabilities and the resources required to develop increasingly sophisticated systems.

The summit renewed attention to the importance of communication on emerging technologies. However, disagreements over technological access and strategic advantage remain significant.

For India, the evolving technology landscape creates a need to strengthen domestic capabilities while maintaining access to international markets, research and investment.

The future of AI competition between the United States and China could influence opportunities for countries seeking to develop their own technology sectors.

What the Summit Means for India

The summit has provided Washington and Beijing with additional room to manage their relationship while continuing to pursue their broader strategic objectives.

For the United States, maintaining stability with China can help manage economic and geopolitical pressures. For China, continued engagement provides an opportunity to avoid immediate escalation and protect its economic interests.

For India, the implications are more complex.

New Delhi has an interest in avoiding a breakdown in US–China communication while ensuring that its own economic, technological and security priorities remain central to its foreign policy.

India’s challenge is not simply to choose between Washington and Beijing. It is to preserve strategic autonomy, strengthen domestic capabilities and build partnerships that support its long-term interests.

The Trump–Xi summit therefore highlights a broader feature of international relations: the growing importance of managing competition between major powers while ensuring that other countries retain the ability to shape their own strategic choices.

26 September 2026 0 comment

Blog Business Featured India

India’s Exports to China Rise as Electronics and Engineering Gain Ground

by theparliamentnews.com 21 September 2026

written by theparliamentnews.com

India’s trade relationship with China is showing a shift beneath the headline trade-deficit numbers. Indian exports to China have risen sharply in recent months, with electronics and engineering goods emerging as important contributors. The change offers a closer look at India’s growing role in global manufacturing, while also highlighting the substantial gaps that remain in the broader bilateral trade relationship.

Indian exports to China rose by nearly 40% during the April-August period of 2026, according to an analysis of government data reported by Bloomberg. Electronics and engineering products were among the key drivers of the increase.

Electronics Move Into Focus

Electronics has been one of the clearest areas of growth. India’s electronics exports to China tripled to around US$3.18 billion in FY2025-26, with products including printed circuit board assemblies, smartphones, display modules and telecommunications equipment contributing to the increase. Electronics shipments continued to grow in the current financial year, rising by more than 15% during April-August compared with the same period a year earlier.

The growth is significant because these products sit within supply chains that are increasingly important to the global technology industry. Industry representatives have linked part of the recent demand to the expansion of artificial intelligence infrastructure and data centres, which is increasing demand for electronic equipment and components.

Printed circuit board assemblies are one example. Indian PCBA exports to China rose more than 40-fold to around $1.5 billion in FY2025-26, according to Commerce Department data cited by Business Standard. At the same time, India continued to import a much larger value of electronics products from China, showing that the increase in exports does not yet represent a reversal of the broader supply-chain relationship.

Engineering Exports Also Increase

The change is not limited to electronics. Indian engineering exports to China have also recorded strong growth.

In June 2026, India’s engineering exports to China increased by about 74% year-on-year to $361.47 million, according to Reuters citing engineering exporters. The wider engineering sector grew by 21% during the month. Products involved include machinery, auto components and other industrial goods.

This suggests that Indian manufacturers are finding opportunities beyond traditional export categories. However, the relatively small base of exports to China means that high percentage growth should be interpreted alongside the absolute value of shipments.

The Trade Deficit Remains Large

The increase in exports should not be confused with a reversal of India’s trade relationship with China.

Government data shows that India exported $19.47 billion worth of goods to China in FY2025-26, while imports from China reached $131.63 billion. The resulting trade deficit was about $112.16 billion.

China therefore remains a major source of goods for Indian businesses and consumers, particularly in areas such as electronics, industrial inputs and components.

This distinction is important. India’s recent export growth demonstrates that Indian companies can increasingly participate in Chinese and wider global supply chains, but it does not show that India has replaced China as a manufacturing centre.

What the Export Growth Really Shows

The more important story may be the type of products India is beginning to export.

The movement of electronics assemblies, smartphones, display-related products, telecommunications equipment and engineering goods to China indicates that Indian manufacturing is becoming more integrated into complex international supply chains.

At the same time, much of the value chain remains outside India. Indian manufacturers still depend significantly on imported components, machinery and other industrial inputs. Building a deeper domestic supplier network will therefore be important if export growth is to translate into greater domestic value addition.

India’s next challenge is not simply to assemble more products, but to increase its capabilities across the manufacturing chain including components, semiconductor-related production, industrial machinery, product design, research and development and technology.

Recent developments in India’s semiconductor ecosystem illustrate this broader direction. For example, Dutch chipmaker Nexperia and Tata Electronics announced a partnership in September 2026 covering chip production and packaging in India. Such investments could gradually strengthen India’s position in higher-value segments of electronics manufacturing.

From Assembly to Value Addition

The expansion of exports to China provides evidence of progress, but it also highlights the distance still to be covered.

For India, the long-term objective would be to move beyond being a location for assembly and develop deeper domestic capabilities in components, design, intellectual property, technology and supply-chain management.

That process could become increasingly important as global demand for AI infrastructure, data centres, telecommunications equipment and advanced electronics expands.

The latest trade numbers therefore tell a more nuanced story than either a manufacturing success narrative or a simple account of dependence on China. India is exporting more manufactured goods to China, particularly electronics and engineering products, while continuing to import a much larger value of goods from its neighbour.

The emerging picture is one of gradual change rather than a wholesale transformation. “Made in India” is gaining a larger place in certain global manufacturing supply chains, but the next stage will depend on how much technology, components, design and value addition can increasingly be developed within India.

21 September 2026 0 comment

Blog Featured Politics World

New US Russia Sanctions Law Raises Tariff Risks for India

by theparliamentnews.com 19 September 2026

written by theparliamentnews.com

September 18: US President Donald Trump has signed into law a Russia sanctions bill that gives his administration new authority to impose tariffs of up to 100% on countries that continue to purchase Russian oil and gas. The legislation could expose major buyers such as India and China to additional US trade measures, although the law does not automatically impose a 100% tariff on either country.

The law requires the administration to impose tariffs of up to 100% within 30 days on goods imported into the United States from countries that fall within specified categories, including the five largest importers of Russian crude oil or natural gas. It also covers countries that knowingly make new purchases of Russian energy after the law takes effect or rank among the top five countries facilitating sanctions evasion.

India and China are among the major buyers of Russian crude. However, the legislation does not specifically name either country as a target. The criteria for determining the relevant top-five groups leave significant discretion with the US administration over how the provisions are applied.

Broad Tariff and Sanctions Powers

The legislation, formally named the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026, targets Russia’s energy and defence sectors and its so-called shadow fleet of tankers accused of helping Moscow circumvent sanctions. The law also gives the president authority to waive tariffs or sanctions on national security grounds.

The House of Representatives approved the measure on September 16 after the Senate had passed it earlier. Trump subsequently signed it into law on September 18, completing a legislative process that had been delayed for more than a year.

The new authority expands the administration’s ability to use trade measures against countries maintaining significant economic links with Russia. At the same time, the waiver provision gives the White House flexibility over how aggressively to apply the new powers.

Implications for India

The legislation has created uncertainty for India because of its continued purchases of Russian crude. India has previously warned Washington that additional tariffs linked to Russian oil purchases could affect bilateral relations and has said that maintaining energy security remains a priority.

India is also an important exporter to the United States. Reuters reported that Indian goods shipments to the US reached $42.79 billion during April-August, up from $40.39 billion during the same period a year earlier. This makes any additional US tariff action potentially significant for Indian exporters.

However, the immediate effect of the new law remains uncertain. The legislation establishes the authority and criteria for potential action, but the administration still has to determine which countries meet the relevant conditions and how the provisions will be used.

Global Energy and Trade Concerns

The potential tariffs come at a sensitive time for global energy markets. Restrictions on major buyers of Russian oil could alter established trade flows and affect the availability and price of crude in international markets.

Reuters reported that Russian crude prices have already risen sharply in September amid increased Chinese demand and disruptions affecting Middle Eastern energy supplies. Any further restrictions on Russian energy trade could therefore have effects beyond the countries directly targeted.

Higher energy costs could also feed into transportation, manufacturing and consumer prices. This creates an economic consideration for governments deciding how far to use tariffs against Russian energy buyers.

What Happens Next

The legislation does not establish that India or China will automatically face a 100% tariff. Instead, it provides the Trump administration with a new legal mechanism to impose such duties if countries meet the conditions specified in the law.

For India, the issue now lies at the intersection of energy security, exports and relations with Washington. New Delhi will have to monitor how the US administration interprets the law, particularly the criteria used to identify countries subject to additional tariffs.

The next phase will therefore depend on decisions by the Trump administration rather than on the signing of the legislation alone. Until specific tariffs are announced, the scale of the direct impact on Indian exports remains uncertain.

19 September 2026 0 comment

Newer Posts

Older Posts

Featured

Food and Energy Costs Drive Inflation Concerns

Core Inflation May Show a More Moderate Increase

Federal Reserve Faces a Difficult Policy Decision

Social Security Benefits Also in Focus

Robert E. Hall: Understanding Household Spending

Michael Woodford: Why Expectations Matter

How Individual Choices Affect the Economy

Implications for Governments and Central Banks

The Wider Significance of Their Research

What triggered the US action?

Understanding the PERM programme

Why Indian IT professionals could be affected

Nasscom highlights the distinction between immigration and talent mobility

What happens next?

Credit Is Likely to Become More Expensive

The Bigger Question Is Credit Growth

Deposits Could Become More Important

Real Estate Faces a Short-Term Test

Growth Versus Inflation

Economic Growth and Corporate Earnings

Crude Oil and the Cost of Imports

Global Financial Conditions and Foreign Investment

Why Strong Growth May Not Lift Stock Prices

What Investors Are Watching

The Broader Economic Picture

A Trade Truce, Not a Permanent Settlement

Technology and Strategic Competition Remain Central

The Role of Great-Power Diplomacy

The G2 Question and India’s Strategic Position

Critical Minerals and Supply-Chain Resilience

Artificial Intelligence and the Next Phase of Competition

What the Summit Means for India

Electronics Move Into Focus

Engineering Exports Also Increase

The Trade Deficit Remains Large

From Assembly to Value Addition

Broad Tariff and Sanctions Powers

Implications for India

Global Energy and Trade Concerns

What Happens Next

Our News Portal

About Links

Useful Links

Newsletter

Are you sure want to unlock this post?

Are you sure want to cancel subscription?

Queue