Home Tags Posts tagged with "Microsoft"
Tag:

Microsoft

windows 12

Microsoft has officially paused the anticipated leap to Windows 12, confirming that the next major update will instead be Windows 11 Version 25H2. This update, set for release in the second half of 2025, signals Microsoft’s decision to refine its current operating system rather than pursue a new generation just yet.

Windows 11 Version 25H2: A Strategic Continuation
Rather than introducing a bold overhaul, Windows 11 Version 25H2 is described by Microsoft as an evolutionary step. Built on the same Germanium platform as its predecessor (24H2), it will be delivered as a lightweight enablement package — easy to install and intended to prolong system support with minimal user disruption.

“Today, Windows 11 version 25H2 became available to the Windows Insider community,” said Jason Leznek, Principal Product Manager at Microsoft, in a statement released on the Windows IT Pro blog.

The update restarts the 36-month support lifecycle for Enterprise and Education editions and renews the 24-month lifecycle for Pro variants, emphasizing servicing continuity and long-term deployment planning over flashy features.

What to Expect: Feature Speculation and Insider Testing
While the blog post was sparse on end-user features, early Insider builds hint at potential customisation improvements for the Start Menu and AI-assisted tools embedded in Settings. These additions, however, remain unconfirmed and may only appear in later preview releases.

The emphasis for now is on performance stability, compatibility, and supporting enterprise infrastructure. This measured rollout strategy underlines Microsoft’s “Windows as a Service” model, which has increasingly blurred the lines between version upgrades and cumulative updates.

No Windows 12—At Least Not Yet
Speculation around Windows 12 had been mounting in recent months, spurred by leaked vendor roadmaps and expectations of AI-driven operating system advances. But Microsoft has not confirmed the development of a next-generation OS. With 25H2 now slated for autumn 2025, any major transition to Windows 12 is unlikely to materialise before 2026.

This decision reflects Microsoft’s broader intent to prioritise support continuity over generational branding — a sentiment echoed across tech communities.

Industry Reactions: Lukewarm but Understanding
The tech community’s reaction has been subdued. Posts on platforms like Reddit and X (formerly Twitter) question the relevance of sticking to numerical versioning, especially as Microsoft’s update cadence increasingly mirrors service-based models rather than traditional OS cycles.

“Short of an entirely new platform, a new name feels unnecessary,” observed one developer.

While this conservative approach may not excite early adopters, it offers stability to enterprise users — a cornerstone of Microsoft’s current strategy.

By choosing to extend Windows 11 through Version 25H2, Microsoft signals a continued commitment to incremental, service-focused updates over sweeping generational changes. This approach favors enterprises and long-term users, even if it leaves enthusiasts waiting for the next big leap.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

A striking revelation that underscores the accelerating shift in software development, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella disclosed that artificial intelligence is now responsible for generating as much as 30% of the code within the company’s internal repositories. Speaking at Meta’s inaugural LlamaCon AI developer summit in Menlo Park, California, Nadella emphasized that this figure is steadily rising — a clear signal that generative AI is becoming deeply embedded in Microsoft’s engineering workflows.

Nadella made this statement during a candid conversation with Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, where the two tech giants discussed the growing role of AI in shaping their companies’ futures. “I’d say maybe 20%, 30% of the code that is inside of our repos today and some of our projects are probably all written by software,” Nadella noted before the live audience, hinting at a not-so-distant future where machines shoulder the bulk of code production.

Zuckerberg, while not quoting exact figures for Meta, echoed the sentiment. He revealed that Meta is currently developing AI systems capable of designing and evolving future iterations of its Llama models. “Our bet is sort of that in the next year probably … maybe half the development is going to be done by AI, as opposed to people,” Zuckerberg said, outlining a future where AI becomes the primary architect of digital infrastructure.

These insights are not isolated. They reflect a wider movement sweeping through the tech industry. Since the launch of ChatGPT in 2022, companies have increasingly turned to AI not just for customer interaction or content generation, but for core engineering functions. Google CEO Sundar Pichai recently said that over 25% of the company’s new code is now generated by AI tools. Shopify CEO Tobi Lutke went a step further, stating that employees must now demonstrate a task cannot be done by AI before requesting additional manpower. Meanwhile, Duolingo CEO Luis von Ahn announced a transition toward AI in place of some human contractors.

The implications go beyond operational efficiency. The dream now is software written faster, with fewer bugs, and better adaptability — a scenario that AI-powered development promises to bring closer to reality. Startups like Windsurf, reportedly in acquisition talks with OpenAI, are pushing the boundaries by offering “vibe coding” software that can generate entire applications from just a few lines of human input.

As Nadella and Zuckerberg continue to lead organizations that both create and adopt frontier AI models, their insights offer more than just a glimpse into internal operations — they signal a profound redefinition of how software itself will be imagined, designed, and deployed in the years to come.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

After months of silence, Microsoft’s much-talked-about Recall feature is finally making a comeback—this time, with a clear message: privacy comes first.

Unveiled with much fanfare as part of Microsoft’s AI push for Windows 11, Recall had initially promised users the ability to “remember” everything they’ve seen on their computers—be it a document, recipe, website, or app. But the idea of a tool constantly taking screenshots of one’s digital life raised more than a few eyebrows. And rightly so. Privacy advocates and security experts were quick to call out the risks of such a powerful feature going unchecked.

So, Microsoft hit pause.

Now, after what seems to be a serious course correction, Recall is back. The updated version is now being rolled out to Windows Insiders in the Release Preview Channel—and it comes with major changes that put users in control.


A Redesign with Privacy at Its Core

Let’s be clear: the new Recall isn’t the same as its original version. Microsoft has gone to great lengths to ensure that the feature works for the user—not against them. First and foremost, Recall is now turned off by default. If you want to use it, you have to opt in.

Snapshots are no longer floating freely inside your system. Each screenshot is encrypted and tied to your identity using Windows Hello, meaning only you—the verified device owner—can access them.

Also, nothing is sent to the cloud. All captured data lives and breathes locally on your device. No syncing, no sharing, no server-side storage.


Timeline, Meet “Click to Do”

The updated Recall isn’t just about watching your activity—it’s about actioning it. Enter the new “Click to Do” feature. With it, users can interact directly with their timeline: copy a piece of text, reopen a file, or jump back into a web page—all from a snapshot.

This is where Microsoft’s AI quietly steps in. Rather than just remembering where you’ve been, it helps connect the dots to get you back to what matters faster.


Total Control in Your Hands

Microsoft has made sure users don’t feel trapped inside Recall. You can pause the tracking whenever you want. You can delete snapshots—selectively or entirely. And if you’re done with it, you can simply turn it off.

The company’s shift to a privacy-by-design model is evident in how this rollout is structured. Every step is now deliberate. You decide when it starts. You decide what stays. You decide what goes.


Language Support and What’s Coming Next

The current rollout supports six major languages: English, Simplified Chinese, German, French, Spanish, and Japanese. However, functionality might vary depending on where you are or what device you’re using.

This isn’t a full release yet—it’s still a test phase, albeit the most extensive one yet. If all goes smoothly, the public rollout is expected to happen in early 2025. A separate launch for Europe is also on the horizon, tailored to meet the continent’s tighter data regulations.


Final Thoughts

Microsoft’s reworked Recall feature feels less like a surveillance tool and more like a smart assistant that respects boundaries. It’s a good example of what happens when users speak up—and companies listen.

Yes, Recall still captures your activity. But now, it does so on your terms. The line between convenience and control has always been tricky in tech—but with this redesign, Microsoft may have found a middle path worth following.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

In the latest chapter of the ongoing battle for search engine dominance, Google has called out Microsoft over a controversial redesign of Bing’s search interface. The critique, led by Parisa Tabriz, Google Chrome’s security chief, has added fuel to the long-standing rivalry between the tech giants.

The Controversial Bing Interface

Microsoft recently unveiled a new feature in Bing that closely mimics Google’s iconic homepage design. When users, particularly those not signed into a Microsoft account, search for “Google” or “Google.com” through Bing, they are greeted with a strikingly similar interface.

This page features a centered search bar, animated visuals reminiscent of Google Doodles, and a banner that reads, “Every search brings you closer to a free donation. Choose from over 2 million nonprofits!” This banner redirects users to the Microsoft Rewards catalog, where they can donate points to charitable organizations.

However, Microsoft has hidden Bing’s branding in this design. Users only realize they’re still on Bing if they scroll or interact with the page.

Google’s Response

Parisa Tabriz didn’t hold back in her criticism. Posting on X (formerly Twitter), she described Microsoft’s move as “another tactic in its long history of tricks to confuse users and limit choice.” Tabriz’s closing remark, “New year; new low, Microsoft,” underscored the depth of Google’s disapproval.

Microsoft’s Motivation: A Retention Strategy

Industry analysts suggest this redesign is a strategic move to retain users. Many individuals setting up new Windows PCs use Microsoft Edge’s default Bing search engine to search for Google and switch to their preferred platform.

By presenting a Google-like interface, Microsoft aims to dissuade less experienced users from making the switch. While tech-savvy individuals might see through the design, casual users may find themselves sticking with Bing longer than intended.

The Bigger Picture: Search Engine Rivalry

This isn’t the first time Microsoft has employed aggressive tactics to boost Bing. From pop-ups to changes in Chrome’s download page, Microsoft has a history of trying to keep users within its ecosystem.

Google, on the other hand, has primarily focused on encouraging users to download Chrome and set Google as their default search engine—without resorting to mimicry.

As of December, Google dominates the global search engine market with an 89.74% share, compared to Bing’s modest 3.97%. This disparity underscores Microsoft’s uphill battle to challenge Google’s supremacy.

What This Means for Users

This incident raises questions about ethics in the tech industry and user choice. While competition drives innovation, tactics that blur boundaries between platforms can erode user trust.

Ultimately, this rivalry serves as a reminder for users to remain vigilant and informed. As the search engine wars continue, transparency and ethical practices will remain critical in shaping the future of online search.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Microsoft has issued a stern warning to nearly 400 million Windows users, urging them to think twice before updating their PCs. This advisory comes amid growing confusion fueled by conflicting reports and unclear messaging from the tech giant. With the end-of-life for Windows 10 looming and the stringent requirements for Windows 11 upgrades, users are left navigating a minefield of mixed signals.

The Update Chaos Unfolds

Microsoft’s Patch Tuesday for December 2024 rolled out 71 security fixes, including patches for a critical zero-day vulnerability. However, the company’s simultaneous advisory has raised eyebrows. Users who upgrade to Windows 11 on unsupported devices—those lacking the Trusted Platform Module (TPM) 2.0—might find themselves excluded from future security updates, a scenario that contradicts the primary reason for upgrading: enhanced security.

Adding fuel to the fire, Microsoft recently appeared to soften its stance on TPM 2.0 requirements, hinting at possible leniency for older systems. Yet, this apparent concession has been contradicted by the company’s earlier firm messaging, leaving users in a quandary.

TPM 2.0: The Key to Windows 11

Since its release, Windows 11 has enforced TPM 2.0 as a critical hardware requirement, promoting it as a cornerstone of modern cybersecurity. However, the rigidity of this requirement has left many older devices out of the upgrade loop. With Windows 10 support set to end, millions of users face the dilemma of either upgrading hardware or risking exposure to unpatched vulnerabilities.

Last week, Microsoft’s updated support documentation seemingly opened a pathway for unsupported PCs to install Windows 11, creating a buzz of optimism. Headlines proclaimed that users with older devices could finally upgrade without meeting the TPM 2.0 threshold. But the reality, as Microsoft clarified later, is far more complex and less user-friendly than these reports suggested.

Environmental Concerns and Consumer Backlash

The push for Windows 11, coupled with stringent hardware requirements, has drawn criticism for potentially creating a massive wave of electronic waste. Older PCs, still operational but incompatible with TPM 2.0, could face premature obsolescence. Experts warn of the environmental and economic toll, as millions of devices might be discarded unnecessarily.

Microsoft’s mixed messaging has exacerbated consumer frustration. For users seeking security and stability, the conflicting updates are both confusing and counterproductive. On one hand, the company underscores the importance of security patches; on the other, it hints at relaxed requirements that could leave devices unsupported.

What Should Users Do?

While Microsoft’s evolving policy on Windows updates remains unclear, one thing is certain: staying informed is critical. Users are advised to:

Evaluate Their Hardware: Check if their systems meet the requirements for Windows 11, especially TPM 2.0 compatibility.

Stay Current with Updates: For those remaining on Windows 10, ensuring the latest updates are installed is vital until official support ends.

Consider Alternatives: For unsupported devices, exploring options like Linux-based systems or third-party security tools could offer interim solutions.

The Road Ahead

As the dust settles on Microsoft’s latest announcements, one thing is clear: the tech giant’s path to “modernizing” its user base is fraught with challenges. The tug-of-war between innovation and inclusivity, security and usability, continues to unfold. For the millions caught in the crossfire, the next steps will require careful navigation, informed decisions, and perhaps a bit more clarity from Microsoft itself.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

In the fast-paced world of technology, innovation is the lifeblood that keeps companies relevant. Recently, Aman Sanger, co-creator of Cursor (developed by Anysphere), shared a bold perspective on Microsoft’s position in this competitive landscape. On the Lex Fridman podcast, Sanger suggested that while Microsoft has accomplished impressive feats, it may not be well-equipped to continue pushing boundaries in the same way that nimble startups can.

The Frustration with Copilot
Sanger’s comments were echoed by fellow co-founder Sualeh Asif, who articulated a sense of frustration among developers regarding the evolution of Microsoft’s Copilot. He pointed out that despite noticeable advancements in AI models like OpenAI’s o1, the Copilot experience seemed stagnant. “It was like, ‘Man, the ceiling is getting higher. Why are they not making new things?’” Asif lamented. His sentiment reflected a broader concern that, despite Copilot’s commercial success, it lacked fresh features and innovation.

Cursor: An All-in-One Platform
In stark contrast to Microsoft, Cursor aims to provide a comprehensive platform for developers. The founding team, comprising Truell, Asif, Arvid Lunnemark, and Sanger, designed Cursor to integrate seamlessly into the workflow of development teams. This integration allows for constant communication between team members, from UI/UX designers to model trainers, fostering a collaborative environment that fuels creativity and innovation.

When Fridman noted the recursive nature of using Cursor to build Cursor, the discussion highlighted how the team is committed to rapidly implementing new features while also engaging in essential research and experimentation. This focus on innovation sets Cursor apart in an industry where many established players seem to lag.

Competing with Giants
In a strategic move to bolster its offerings, GitHub recently integrated OpenAI’s o1 model into Copilot, an attempt to compete with emerging players like Cursor. However, as the Cursor team noted, simply integrating new models isn’t enough. “Most of the additional value from Cursor versus everything else out there is not just integrating the new model fast. It comes from all of the depth that goes into these custom models,” Sanger emphasized, underscoring the importance of thoughtful design and user experience.

Despite the hype surrounding OpenAI’s o1 models, they have struggled with coding tasks, leading to developer dissatisfaction due to slow responses and inaccuracies. This gap in performance presents a significant opportunity for Cursor and other new entrants in the coding assistant market.

The Emergence of Alternatives
The rise of Cursor coincides with the launch of various alternatives aiming to redefine coding experiences. Zed AI, a code editor that integrates large language models directly into the development process, and other startups like Codeium AI and Magic AI have recently reached unicorn status. These platforms are funded by prominent investors and are actively developing their own foundation models, challenging established players.

OpenAI’s introduction of Canvas, which extends ChatGPT’s functionality, and Anthropic’s Claude Artifacts, designed for app creation without coding, further exemplify the changing landscape. Meanwhile, Y Combinator has backed several AI code editors, fueling a wave of innovation in the space.

Developers Demand Efficiency
The demand for efficient coding tools is palpable among developers. A GitHub survey revealed that 97% of developers had used AI coding tools at work, regardless of their employer’s stance. This trend is expected to continue, emphasizing the need for tools that streamline coding tasks and improve productivity.

Cursor’s Tab feature exemplifies this approach, allowing developers to eliminate repetitive actions and enhance workflow efficiency. “All of programming will flow through these models,” Asif predicted, indicating a significant transformation in how software is built.

Speed and Innovation: The Future of Coding
Cursor’s focus on speculative edits and caching allows for real-time assistance, significantly improving coding speed. As Sanger explained, “Speculative edits allow the system to predict ahead of the developer’s actions, streamlining the coding process to near-instant responses.” This emphasis on speed is critical as developers seek to balance rapid development with high-quality output.

According to Truell, “Even being a few months ahead in AI programming makes your product much, much more useful.” Cursor’s use of sparse models and multi-query attention reflects its commitment to minimizing latency and maximizing utility.

As the industry evolves, the dynamics of software development are changing. The founders of Cursor believe that this era is an exciting time for builders. Truell reminisced about the programming landscape of 2012-2013 and expressed optimism for the future, stating, “Fast is Fun.”

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

In a judgment that echoes the landmark antitrust ruling against Microsoft nearly 25 years ago, Google now finds itself at the center of a legal storm that could redefine the tech industry. The recent ruling by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has declared Google a monopolist, accusing the tech giant of stifling competition to protect its dominant position in the online search market. This verdict, which concludes a legal battle that began nearly three years ago, could have far-reaching implications for how Big Tech firms operate.

The case against Google, which started with the consolidation of two lawsuits—United States vs Google and Colorado vs Google—culminated in a nine-week bench trial in September 2023. U.S. District Judge Amit P. Mehta found that Google violated Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act by engaging in anti-competitive practices. Specifically, Google was accused of leveraging its market dominance by making exclusive deals with smartphone manufacturers like Apple and Samsung, ensuring that Google Search remained the default search engine on their devices.

While Google plans to appeal the decision, the U.S. Department of Justice has yet to determine the remedy it will seek. The possible outcomes range from breaking up Google’s business empire to nullifying the exclusive agreements with handset makers. Either remedy could send shockwaves through the tech industry.

If Google is broken up, the very structure of digital business could be transformed. Google’s influence spans across various digital services, and dismantling the company could lead to significant changes in how these services are offered and consumed. On the other hand, if Google is forced to terminate its exclusive agreements, it could lead to immediate financial repercussions, particularly for Apple, which stands to lose billions from its lucrative deal with Google. Such a move could also open the door for consumers to explore alternative search engines, potentially diversifying the online search market.

These potential changes also carry the possibility of pushing Google to innovate further, particularly in areas like user privacy. The long-term effectiveness of alternative search engines remains uncertain, as they would need to scale significantly and gather vast amounts of data to compete with Google’s well-established algorithms. Nevertheless, this ruling could be the catalyst for a more competitive and consumer-focused digital landscape.

Beyond Google, this verdict sets a powerful precedent for ongoing antitrust cases against other tech giants like Meta, Amazon, and Apple. The outcomes of these cases could further shape the future of Big Tech, as regulators around the world take a closer look at the monopolistic practices that have allowed these companies to dominate their respective markets.

As the tech world waits to see what remedies the court will impose, one thing is clear: the days of unchallenged dominance by Big Tech may be coming to an end. This ruling against Google could be the first step toward a more balanced and competitive digital economy.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

In a promising development for the domestic IT sector, leading Indian companies such as Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), Infosys, Wipro, HCL Technologies Ltd, and Tech Mahindra are in the spotlight following Microsoft’s robust Q4 performance. Microsoft’s revenue slightly surpassed US analyst estimates, with its operating margin aligning closely with Wall Street expectations. The tech giant hinted at increased infrastructure investments in FY25, aiming to meet the rising demand for its AI and cloud products.

Under the leadership of Satya Nadella, Microsoft projected a Q1FY25 revenue growth of 13.5-15.3% year-over-year (YoY), driven by an impressive 19.2-20.5% YoY growth in its Intelligent Cloud segment. This growth is further bolstered by a remarkable 28-29% constant currency (CC) YoY increase in Azure.

Nuvama Institutional Equities observed that Microsoft’s Azure business has been accelerating for five consecutive quarters, a significant turnaround after experiencing a six-quarter deceleration. “AI contributed 8% to Azure growth, and the overall pickup in cloud services is encouraging, signaling positive prospects for Indian IT services companies. We anticipate a surge in cloud spending in FY25, following a modest FY24, leading to higher overall growth,” Nuvama stated.

For the quarter, Microsoft reported revenue of $64.7 billion, marking a 16% YoY increase in CC terms. The Intelligent Cloud segment emerged as the fastest-growing area, with its revenue surging 20% YoY in CC to $28.5 billion, meeting the company’s guidance. Notably, Azure’s revenue grew by 30% CC YoY, including 800 basis points from AI services.

Microsoft’s management highlighted that the Azure consumption business is outpacing the overall Azure growth. The number of Azure AI customers has risen by 60% YoY, with the company now boasting over 60,000 Azure AI customers. The demand for Azure continues to exceed the available capacity, underscoring the platform’s robust market position.

“Productivity and business process revenue reached $20.3 billion, up 12% CC YoY. Office consumer revenue grew by 4% CC YoY, driven by sustained momentum in Microsoft 365 subscriptions, while Office commercial licensing saw a 7% CC YoY decline due to the ongoing shift to cloud offerings,” Microsoft reported.

The positive outlook for Microsoft’s cloud and AI segments bodes well for Indian IT giants, suggesting a fertile ground for growth as global demand for these technologies continues to rise. The increased investment in infrastructure and the steady rise in Azure’s customer base highlight a thriving market landscape, promising significant opportunities for Indian IT service providers in the coming fiscal year.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

The Great Exodus: Skilled Techies Shun Big-Tech Giants

Despite the allure of big-ticket jobs at major tech companies like Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta, a surprising trend is emerging: top-tier talent from Ivy League schools, award-winning researchers, and prolific authors are increasingly opting for smaller or mid-sized firms. This shift highlights a growing desire to escape the corporate politics and bureaucratic hurdles often inherent in large organizations.

The Drawbacks of Big Tech

A recent Reddit discussion revealed that many skilled professionals are choosing smaller companies to avoid the politics of big corporations. As one machine learning (ML) engineer succinctly put it, “Why deal with the politics of a big company when you can get funding for your projects?” The freedom and autonomy that smaller companies offer are often more appealing than the bureaucratic obstacles of big tech.

Burnout is another critical factor driving this exodus. Many professionals now prioritize work-life balance over the prestige associated with working for a tech giant. This reflects a broader cultural shift where mental health and personal well-being are becoming increasingly important.

Financial Motivations vs. Inspirational Work

While higher salaries at big-tech firms are undoubtedly attractive, they are not always the primary driving force. The nature of the work itself also plays a significant role. Some ML experts find projects at big-tech companies uninspiring. “Most of the projects at MAANG [Meta, Amazon, Apple, Netflix, and Google] companies are boring,” one contributor noted. Many professionals prefer roles where they can have a more significant impact on the AI roadmap, which smaller firms often provide.

The Hiring Process and Corporate Culture

The elaborate hiring processes at big-tech companies can also be off-putting. One ML engineer pointed out, “Getting into MAANG is an entirely separate field that requires you to study and practise an entire hobby/career path unrelated to your ML expertise.” Busy ML leaders might not have the time or inclination to master these intricate and often lengthy recruitment processes.

Additionally, the work environment and corporate culture at these tech giants can be stifling. One ex-employee described their experience: “Google was a fun, exciting, and innovative place to work in 2004. Twenty years later, it’s decayed into the same bland, vapid, beige-coloured evil as Microsoft.” The transformation of these workplaces over time often leads to disillusionment among those who seek dynamic and innovative environments.

The Appeal of Smaller Firms

In smaller companies, top talents often have more freedom to pursue their research interests without the constraints of a rigid corporate structure. “I prefer smaller! Much cosier, less politics, and most importantly: waaaaay more research agency,” said an ML professional. The opportunity for greater research agency and visibility is a compelling reason why many skilled professionals are choosing smaller firms.

While it is undeniable that big tech produces some of the top research, those who cite autonomy as the reason for leaving miss out on the state-of-the-art research conducted at these giants. However, for many, the trade-offs in terms of autonomy, work-life balance, and ethical considerations make smaller firms more attractive.

The Situation in Indian IT

The situation in Indian IT is slightly different but equally complex. Despite the growing need for good talent in research and development, many Indian researchers do not want to join large IT firms. Predictions indicate that the number of computer science graduates by 2025 will be three or four times higher than in 2020, but the same amount of jobs are not available in the Indian sector.

Entry-level salaries in Indian IT have remained stagnant at INR 3.5-4 LPA for over a decade, making high-paying product companies with compensation packages ranging from INR 10-20 LPA more attractive. This stagnation has led to a reluctance among recent graduates to pursue careers in Indian IT, with many opting to work for startups at higher packages or move abroad for better opportunities.

Conclusion

The shift away from big-tech companies to smaller firms highlights a significant change in the priorities of skilled tech professionals. While big tech can offer substantial salaries and prestigious roles, many find that the trade-offs in terms of autonomy, work-life balance, and the nature of the work make smaller firms more appealing. This trend reflects a broader cultural shift towards valuing personal well-being and meaningful work over financial gain and corporate prestige.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Microsoft Windows users worldwide, including those in India, Australia, Germany, the United States, and the UK, are experiencing a persistent blue screen issue on their laptops. This issue has led to systems restarting or shutting down automatically. Dell Technologies has identified a recent update from CrowdStrike as the root cause of the crashes.

The outage began on Thursday evening, primarily affecting Microsoft’s Central US region, and has significantly disrupted essential systems for numerous airlines. Among the affected airlines are American Airlines, Frontier Airlines, Allegiant, and Sun Country in the US, as well as IndiGo and other carriers in India.

Unclear Scope of Outages

It remains uncertain whether all reported outages are directly linked to the CrowdStrike issue or if there are additional underlying problems contributing to the widespread disruptions.

Understanding CrowdStrike

CrowdStrike is a prominent cybersecurity platform that offers security solutions for both individual users and businesses. The platform uses a single sensor and a unified threat interface to provide comprehensive protection. One of its key features, Falcon Identity Threat Protection, stops identity-driven breaches in real time by correlating attacks across endpoints, workloads, and identities.

The recent problematic update has caused CrowdStrike’s Falcon Sensor to malfunction, leading to conflicts with the Windows operating system.

CrowdStrike’s Response

Acknowledging the error, CrowdStrike has stated, “Our engineers are actively working to resolve this issue, and there is no need to open a support ticket.” The company has committed to updating users once the issue is resolved.

Microsoft’s Azure Outage

Microsoft confirmed that the Azure outage was resolved early Friday. However, the disruption has highlighted the potential risks associated with heavy reliance on cloud services. The outage has impacted various sectors, including airlines, banks, supermarkets, media outlets, and other businesses.

What is the Blue Screen of Death?

The Blue Screen of Death (BSOD) is a critical error screen that appears on Windows operating systems when the system encounters a severe issue that prevents it from operating safely. This error forces the computer to restart unexpectedly, often resulting in the loss of unsaved data.

In this specific case, the BSOD error message states, “Your PC ran into a problem and needs to restart. We are just collecting some error info, then we will restart for you.” This issue has been observed across Windows, Mac, and Linux systems.

The recent Microsoft outage and the ensuing blue screen issue serve as a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure and the far-reaching impact of software updates gone awry.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts

Our News Portal

We provide accurate, balanced, and impartial coverage of national and international affairs, focusing on the activities and developments within the parliament and its surrounding political landscape. We aim to foster informed public discourse and promote transparency in governance through our news articles, features, and opinion pieces.

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

Laest News

@2023 – All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by The Parliament News

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
-
00:00
00:00
Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00