Home Tags Posts tagged with "news"
Tag:

news

ChatGPT delivered a surprisingly grounded response when asked what a “normal person” should do to become financially free echoing advice long championed by seasoned investing experts.

The moment unfolded on The Diary of a CEO podcast, where host Steven Bartlett posed a deliberately simple question to the AI chatbot. Bartlett, who earns $50,000 a year in the hypothetical scenario, asked ChatGPT to give a one-sentence answer on achieving financial freedom, drawing on “all the wisdom in the world.”

Before revealing the AI’s response, Bartlett turned to guest JL Collins author of The Simple Path to Wealth and a leading voice in passive investing. Collins’ advice was succinct: avoid debt, live below your means, and invest the surplus.

ChatGPT’s answer closely mirrored that philosophy. The chatbot recommended consistently saving and investing in low-cost, broad-based index funds such as the S&P 500, while living below one’s means and allowing compounding to work over time.

Bartlett followed up with another broad question: “How do I earn more?” Once again, the AI’s advice aligned with traditional thinking suggesting the development of high-demand skills, seeking career advancement, exploring side hustles, or investing in assets that generate passive income like real estate or dividends.

Collins noted that the response closely resembled principles from his own work, joking that ChatGPT may have “mined his book.” However, the conversation also turned toward the future of work. Collins observed that skills like programming, once considered essential, may no longer guarantee security in the age of artificial intelligence.

That concern was echoed by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, who has warned that AI-driven automation could significantly disrupt employment. Altman has said that many customer support roles may be replaced by AI, and that roughly half of all jobs historically undergo major change every 75 years a process he believes may now happen much faster.

The exchange highlights a striking paradox: while AI is expected to reshape careers and disrupt labour markets, its financial advice at least for now remains firmly rooted in old-school discipline rather than get-rich-quick promises.

Short Summary

ChatGPT’s advice on becoming financially free surprised listeners by closely matching the guidance of veteran investor JL Collins emphasising saving, low-cost index investing, skill development and long-term compounding over flashy shortcuts.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

OpenAI’s reported move toward advertising including testing ads within ChatGPT responses and preparing a Super Bowl LX commercial signals a major strategic pivot for the AI giant. Once framed as one of humanity’s most transformative inventions, ChatGPT is now confronting a far more prosaic challenge: how to survive financially.

On the surface, OpenAI’s numbers appear extraordinary. Recurring revenue reportedly reached $20 billion in 2025, up tenfold in just two years. ChatGPT claims around 800 million active users, with over a million businesses paying for access. By conventional startup metrics, the company looks like a runaway success.

Yet profitability tells a very different story. According to Deutsche Bank estimates, OpenAI could accumulate as much as $143 billion in negative cumulative free cash flow between 2024 and 2029. With only about $17 billion in cash reserves and infrastructure commitments reportedly running into the trillions, analysts argue the company faces an unprecedented scale of losses one that dwarfs even Amazon’s famously unprofitable early years.

Unlike Amazon, however, OpenAI lacks a diversified, cash-generating core business to subsidise its long-term bets. That contrast is clearest when compared with Google. Alphabet’s AI investments sit atop hugely profitable pillars Search advertising, YouTube, Google Cloud and Workspace all of which generate stable cash flow. Google also owns much of its infrastructure and chip supply, while OpenAI remains dependent on external providers for computing power.

This structural gap has made OpenAI’s path to profitability increasingly uncertain. The company would reportedly need to grow annual revenue to around $200 billion within four years to break even a target that appears implausible under existing growth levers. Market expansion adds computing costs rather than lowering them. Price hikes are constrained, with only about 5 per cent of users currently paying for subscriptions. Product diversification, including video generation, browsers and hardware, further raises capital and R&D expenditure.

Against this backdrop, advertising has emerged as a reluctant fallback. OpenAI has begun experimenting with ads in free and low-cost tiers, despite CEO Sam Altman previously calling advertising a “last resort.” Analysts estimate ads could bring in around $25 billion annually by 2030 a significant sum, but far short of what would be required to offset projected losses.

The planned Super Bowl commercial may reinforce OpenAI’s ambition and cultural relevance, but it also underlines a deeper reality: innovation alone is no longer enough. Without a clear and credible route to sustainable profit, OpenAI’s bold vision risks colliding with hard economic limits. In the race to define the future of artificial intelligence, the challenge now is not invention it is survival.

Short Summary

OpenAI’s move to introduce advertising in ChatGPT reflects mounting financial pressure despite explosive revenue growth. With massive infrastructure costs, widening losses and limited pricing power, analysts view ads as a last-resort revenue stream that may still fall short of ensuring long-term profitability.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

The European Union is on the verge of concluding a landmark free trade agreement (FTA) with India, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced on Tuesday (January 20, 2026), calling it “the mother of all deals” that could create a market encompassing nearly two billion people and about a quarter of global GDP.

Speaking at the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting in Davos, von der Leyen said negotiations are in their final stages and that Europe stands to gain a first-mover advantage with one of the world’s fastest-growing economies. “Right after Davos, I will travel to India. There is still work to do, but we are on the cusp of a historic trade agreement,” she said.

European Council President Antonio Costa and von der Leyen will visit India from January 25 to 27 to attend the Republic Day celebrations as chief guests and hold summit talks with Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The two sides are expected to formally announce the conclusion of FTA negotiations at the India-EU summit on January 27.

India is currently the EU’s largest trading partner, with bilateral trade in goods touching $135 billion in FY2023–24. The proposed agreement is expected to significantly boost trade flows, deepen supply-chain integration and open new opportunities across manufacturing, services, technology and green energy sectors.

Beyond trade, the summit is also likely to deliver major strategic outcomes. India and the EU are expected to unveil a defence and security framework, along with a comprehensive strategic vision for the 2026–2030 period. A proposed Security and Defence Partnership (SDP) would enhance defence interoperability and enable Indian firms to participate in the EU’s SAFE programme a €150 billion financial instrument aimed at strengthening European defence readiness.

Negotiations for a Security of Information Agreement (SOIA) are also expected to be launched, which would facilitate deeper industrial defence cooperation. The developments come amid global trade disruptions driven by Washington’s evolving tariff policies, which have affected both India and the 27-nation EU bloc.

India and the EU have been strategic partners since 2004. FTA talks were first launched in 2007 but were suspended in 2013 due to differences in ambition, before being relaunched in June 2022. If concluded, the deal would mark one of the most significant trade agreements for both sides in recent decades.

📌 Short Summary

The European Union is close to finalising a landmark free trade agreement with India, described by Ursula von der Leyen as “the mother of all deals.” Expected to be announced during the India-EU summit on January 27, the agreement aims to deepen trade, defence and strategic cooperation at a time of global trade uncertainty.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Article

India’s latest Household Consumption Expenditure Survey (HCES) 2023–24 exposes a deeply uncomfortable reality: tobacco consumption is rising rapidly across the country, even as the state expands publicly funded healthcare. The surge is most pronounced among poorer households, creating a dangerous feedback loop of preventable disease and rising fiscal burden on welfare systems.

Adjusted for inflation, per capita tobacco spending rose 58% in rural India and 77% in urban areas over the past decade. The number of tobacco-consuming households has surged dramatically, with nearly 69% of rural and 46% of urban households now consuming tobacco products. Gutkha has emerged as the dominant driver, especially in rural India, where its consumption has increased nearly sixfold.

The impact is most severe among the poor. Over 70% of rural households in the bottom 40% income bracket consume tobacco, spending a higher share of their limited resources on addictive products than wealthier households. In several states, including Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Bihar, prevalence exceeds 85%.

This trend has serious implications for public health and public finances. Tobacco-related illnesses contribute to nearly 13 lakh deaths annually, while non-communicable diseases now account for 63% of all deaths in India. As schemes like Ayushman Bharat expand coverage and reduce out-of-pocket expenses, the long-term cost of tobacco-induced disease increasingly shifts to the state.

Despite this, tobacco contributes only 2.4% of gross tax revenue, and regulatory enforcement remains weak. Surrogate advertising and celebrity endorsements continue largely unchecked. The HCES data signals a clear policy alarm: without stronger taxation, regulation and prevention, India risks undermining its own welfare and human capital goals.

Short Summary

The HCES 2023–24 reveals a troubling paradox in India’s welfare trajectory: while publicly funded healthcare is expanding, tobacco consumption especially gutkha is rising sharply, particularly among poorer households. Tobacco use has spread widely across rural and urban India, imposing severe health risks and threatening the fiscal sustainability of welfare schemes like Ayushman Bharat. Without stronger taxation, regulation, and public health intervention, the state risks subsidising preventable disease while undermining human capital development.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Apple Pay is reportedly preparing for its long-awaited entry into the Indian market, with the digital payments service expected to launch by the end of 2026, according to a report by Business Standard citing unnamed sources.

The service, which is currently available in 89 global markets, is said to be awaiting regulatory approval in India. Apple is reportedly in discussions with banks, regulators, and card networks to finalise the rollout framework.

In its initial phase, Apple Pay in India is expected to focus on card-based contactless payments rather than the Unified Payments Interface (UPI). The report notes that UPI integration may be introduced later due to more complex regulatory requirements. Apple is also said to be negotiating fee structures with card issuers and is unlikely to seek third-party application provider (TPAP) approval for UPI at the outset.

Once launched, Apple Pay is expected to support Tap to Pay on iPhone, allowing users to make NFC-based contactless payments at compatible point-of-sale terminals. The service can be used via iPhone and Apple Watch at retail stores, restaurants, fuel stations, and other locations displaying contactless payment symbols. It also supports in-app and online payments where Apple Pay is enabled.

The entry of Apple Pay is expected to intensify competition in India’s digital payments ecosystem. Apple’s rival Samsung already offers Samsung Wallet in the country, which supports contactless payments on compatible devices.

Globally, Apple Pay is supported by over 11,000 banks and network partners, including more than 20 local payment networks, according to Apple. If launched, Apple Pay would add another major international player to India’s rapidly evolving digital payments landscape.

Short Summary

Apple Pay is reportedly set to launch in India by the end of 2026, pending regulatory approval. The initial rollout is expected to focus on card-based contactless payments, with UPI integration likely at a later stage.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Trump Revives Greenland Proposal at Davos, Draws Firm European Response
Article

Davos, Switzerland | January 21, 2026:
US President Donald Trump reignited controversy at the World Economic Forum (WEF) 2026 after reiterating his view that the United States should gain control of Greenland, prompting strong responses from European leaders and adding to existing transatlantic tensions.

Speaking during his address at Davos, Trump said the United States would not use force to acquire the Arctic territory but maintained that Greenland was strategically important for US national security and global influence in the Arctic. Greenland is an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark.

Trump’s remarks were closely watched by world leaders attending the summit, which is traditionally focused on global economic cooperation, trade, and climate policy.

European Leaders Reject Proposal

European officials responded firmly, reiterating that decisions regarding Greenland’s future rest with Denmark and the people of Greenland.

UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said Britain would not compromise on issues of sovereignty, emphasising respect for international law and self-determination. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen called for greater European strategic autonomy, particularly in light of rising geopolitical pressure and potential trade measures.

The comments underscored growing diplomatic strains between the United States and its European allies.

Tariff Threats Add to Tensions

Alongside his Greenland remarks, Trump again raised the prospect of imposing 10 per cent tariffs on imports from European countries opposing US plans, with the rate potentially rising to 25 per cent if negotiations do not progress.

The tariff threat has raised concerns among European trade officials, though UK Finance Minister Rachel Reeves said existing economic arrangements between London and Washington were expected to remain stable despite political differences.

Calls for Dialogue

Amid the escalating rhetoric, US House Speaker Mike Johnson, addressing lawmakers in the UK Parliament, urged restraint and dialogue, calling for continued cooperation between the United States and its allies.

Broader Implications

Trump’s remarks shifted attention at Davos from economic collaboration to geopolitical divisions, raising questions about the future of:

NATO unity

Transatlantic trade relations

Arctic governance and sovereignty

Greenland’s strategic location, mineral resources, and role in emerging Arctic shipping routes have increasingly placed it at the centre of global geopolitical discussions.

World leaders are now watching closely to see whether the dispute moves toward negotiation or further diplomatic escalation.

Short Summary

US President Donald Trump renewed calls for US control of Greenland during his Davos address, prompting firm pushback from European leaders. The remarks, combined with renewed tariff threats, have heightened diplomatic tensions between the United States and its European allies.Trump Revives Greenland Proposal at Davos, Draws Firm European Response
Article

Davos, Switzerland | January 21, 2026:
US President Donald Trump reignited controversy at the World Economic Forum (WEF) 2026 after reiterating his view that the United States should gain control of Greenland, prompting strong responses from European leaders and adding to existing transatlantic tensions.

Speaking during his address at Davos, Trump said the United States would not use force to acquire the Arctic territory but maintained that Greenland was strategically important for US national security and global influence in the Arctic. Greenland is an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark.

Trump’s remarks were closely watched by world leaders attending the summit, which is traditionally focused on global economic cooperation, trade, and climate policy.

European Leaders Reject Proposal

European officials responded firmly, reiterating that decisions regarding Greenland’s future rest with Denmark and the people of Greenland.

UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said Britain would not compromise on issues of sovereignty, emphasising respect for international law and self-determination. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen called for greater European strategic autonomy, particularly in light of rising geopolitical pressure and potential trade measures.

The comments underscored growing diplomatic strains between the United States and its European allies.

Tariff Threats Add to Tensions

Alongside his Greenland remarks, Trump again raised the prospect of imposing 10 per cent tariffs on imports from European countries opposing US plans, with the rate potentially rising to 25 per cent if negotiations do not progress.

The tariff threat has raised concerns among European trade officials, though UK Finance Minister Rachel Reeves said existing economic arrangements between London and Washington were expected to remain stable despite political differences.

Calls for Dialogue

Amid the escalating rhetoric, US House Speaker Mike Johnson, addressing lawmakers in the UK Parliament, urged restraint and dialogue, calling for continued cooperation between the United States and its allies.

Broader Implications

Trump’s remarks shifted attention at Davos from economic collaboration to geopolitical divisions, raising questions about the future of:

NATO unity

Transatlantic trade relations

Arctic governance and sovereignty

Greenland’s strategic location, mineral resources, and role in emerging Arctic shipping routes have increasingly placed it at the centre of global geopolitical discussions.

World leaders are now watching closely to see whether the dispute moves toward negotiation or further diplomatic escalation.

Short Summary

US President Donald Trump renewed calls for US control of Greenland during his Davos address, prompting firm pushback from European leaders. The remarks, combined with renewed tariff threats, have heightened diplomatic tensions between the United States and its European allies.Davos, Switzerland | January 21, 2026:
US President Donald Trump reignited controversy at the World Economic Forum (WEF) 2026 after reiterating his view that the United States should gain control of Greenland, prompting strong responses from European leaders and adding to existing transatlantic tensions.

Speaking during his address at Davos, Trump said the United States would not use force to acquire the Arctic territory but maintained that Greenland was strategically important for US national security and global influence in the Arctic. Greenland is an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark.

Trump’s remarks were closely watched by world leaders attending the summit, which is traditionally focused on global economic cooperation, trade, and climate policy.

European Leaders Reject Proposal

European officials responded firmly, reiterating that decisions regarding Greenland’s future rest with Denmark and the people of Greenland.

UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said Britain would not compromise on issues of sovereignty, emphasising respect for international law and self-determination. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen called for greater European strategic autonomy, particularly in light of rising geopolitical pressure and potential trade measures.

The comments underscored growing diplomatic strains between the United States and its European allies.

Tariff Threats Add to Tensions

Alongside his Greenland remarks, Trump again raised the prospect of imposing 10 per cent tariffs on imports from European countries opposing US plans, with the rate potentially rising to 25 per cent if negotiations do not progress.

The tariff threat has raised concerns among European trade officials, though UK Finance Minister Rachel Reeves said existing economic arrangements between London and Washington were expected to remain stable despite political differences.

Calls for Dialogue

Amid the escalating rhetoric, US House Speaker Mike Johnson, addressing lawmakers in the UK Parliament, urged restraint and dialogue, calling for continued cooperation between the United States and its allies.

Broader Implications

Trump’s remarks shifted attention at Davos from economic collaboration to geopolitical divisions, raising questions about the future of:

NATO unity

Transatlantic trade relations

Arctic governance and sovereignty

Greenland’s strategic location, mineral resources, and role in emerging Arctic shipping routes have increasingly placed it at the centre of global geopolitical discussions.

World leaders are now watching closely to see whether the dispute moves toward negotiation or further diplomatic escalation.

Short Summary

US President Donald Trump renewed calls for US control of Greenland during his Davos address, prompting firm pushback from European leaders. The remarks, combined with renewed tariff threats, have heightened diplomatic tensions between the United States and its European allies.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Article

US President Donald Trump has once again defended the use of tariffs as a central economic policy tool, arguing that import duties help the government raise revenue, protect domestic industries, and encourage consumers to buy American-made products. However, economic data and independent studies suggest that the burden of tariffs largely falls on US consumers and businesses, rather than foreign exporters.

The latest dispute follows Trump’s warning that the United States will impose 10 per cent tariffs from February 1, rising to 25 per cent by June 1, on imports from Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Finland, unless these countries support his proposal for the US to acquire Greenland. The tariffs would remain in place until what Trump described as a “complete and total purchase” is agreed upon.

Trump has justified the move by calling Greenland “vital to US national security” and citing concerns over European activity in the Arctic region.

Trump’s Case for Tariffs

Trump has consistently argued that tariffs:

increase government revenue,

reduce the US trade deficit,

push consumers toward domestically manufactured goods, and

encourage companies to invest and produce within the United States.

He has framed trade deficits as evidence that the US is being economically disadvantaged by foreign countries and has repeatedly claimed that tariffs can restore manufacturing jobs and industrial capacity.

Rising Costs for Consumers

Evidence from recent years suggests that tariffs tend to raise prices for American consumers. According to the BBC, US inflation rose to 3 per cent in the year ending September, up from 2.4 per cent in April, before easing to 2.7 per cent in November and December.

Several major retailers, including Target, Walmart, and Adidas, have indicated that higher import costs resulting from tariffs are passed on to consumers through price increases.

Industries that rely on global supply chains are particularly affected. In the automobile sector, parts frequently cross US, Mexican, and Canadian borders multiple times during production, meaning tariffs increase costs at several stages of manufacturing.

Who Really Pays?

A study by the Kiel Institute for the World Economy found that around 96 per cent of tariff costs are borne by US buyers, including households and businesses, while only about 4 per cent is absorbed by foreign exporters through lower prices. This makes tariffs function similarly to a consumption tax.

Earlier analyses by institutions such as Goldman Sachs showed that while US firms initially absorbed some tariff costs, these expenses were increasingly passed on to consumers over time.

Various estimates suggest that tariffs have acted like a tax increase of roughly $1,100–$1,500 per household per year, with a US Congressional report estimating the 2025 cost at around $1,200 per family.

Impact on Trade and Jobs

Trump has claimed that tariffs would reduce the US trade deficit. However, during the earlier trade war, the US trade deficit with China widened from about $375 billion in 2017 to $419 billion in 2018, before declining modestly in 2019. Economists note that tariffs often redirect trade flows rather than reducing overall deficits.

Employment data also shows limited benefits. While some protected sectors such as steel and aluminium saw modest job gains, overall manufacturing job growth remained weak. In several industries, higher input costs led to job losses instead of gains.

Research from the Federal Reserve and the International Monetary Fund indicates that tariffs weighed on GDP growth and investment. Estimates cited by The Independent suggest the trade war reduced US economic output by $40–$60 billion annually.

A Mixed Economic Record

While tariffs have provided targeted protection for certain industries, broader data suggests they have increased costs for consumers, strained supply chains, and delivered limited gains in employment and trade balances. Economists widely agree that tariffs alone are unlikely to achieve long-term economic objectives without broader structural reforms.

Short Summary

Donald Trump argues that tariffs boost US revenue, protect domestic industries, and reduce trade deficits. However, studies show that most tariff costs are passed on to American consumers, raising prices, increasing household expenses, and delivering limited gains in manufacturing jobs or trade balances.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Silver img

Silver prices surged to a record high in futures trade on Monday, crossing the ₹3 lakh per kilogram mark for the first time, supported by strong global cues and rising investor demand.

On the Multi Commodity Exchange (MCX), silver futures for March delivery jumped by ₹13,553, or 4.71%, to hit an all-time high of ₹3,01,315 per kilogram during the session.

The rally was mirrored in international markets. On global commodity exchanges, the March silver futures contract rose by $5.81, or 6.56%, to touch a record high of $94.35 per ounce.

Market analysts attributed the sharp rise to robust industrial demand for silver, particularly from sectors such as electronics, renewable energy, and manufacturing. A weaker US dollar also supported prices, making dollar-denominated commodities more attractive to investors.

Silver has been outperforming gold in recent sessions, as demand for the white metal remains strong amid expectations of continued industrial consumption and global economic adjustments. Analysts noted that silver’s dual role as both an industrial metal and a precious asset has contributed to heightened investor interest.

Market participants are closely watching global economic indicators, currency movements, and industrial demand trends for further cues on price direction.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Trump Tariffs

US President Donald Trump has announced the imposition of 10 per cent tariffs on several European countries, including Denmark, the United Kingdom, and France, citing their opposition to his proposal for the United States to acquire Greenland.

In a post on his social media platform Truth Social, Trump said the tariffs would take effect from February 1 and warned that the rate would be increased to 25 per cent from June 1 if negotiations fail to result in what he described as the “complete and total purchase of Greenland” by the United States.

The announcement came a day after Trump warned that countries opposing his Greenland plan could face economic measures. He has repeatedly argued that Greenland is strategically important for US national security due to its mineral resources and Arctic location.

European leaders have rejected the proposal, stating that Greenland’s future can only be decided by Denmark and the people of Greenland. Denmark recently confirmed that it would strengthen its military presence in Greenland, working in coordination with allies.

The White House said the increased European military presence would not affect the US position. France’s Armed Forces Minister Alice Rufo described the developments as a sign that Europe was prepared to defend sovereignty.

Trump has justified his position by claiming that US control of Greenland is necessary to prevent the region from falling under the influence of China or Russia. Earlier this week, he said that any outcome short of US ownership was “unacceptable.”

Following meetings in Washington, Danish officials said the two governments remained in fundamental disagreement over Greenland’s future. Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen ruled out any US acquisition, stating that such a move would violate international law and infringe on sovereignty.

Greenland’s Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen reaffirmed the territory’s alignment with Denmark and Europe, saying Greenland would choose Denmark, NATO, and the European Union if forced to decide.

Public opposition has also grown in Denmark, where thousands of demonstrators marched in Copenhagen to support Greenland’s self-governance. Protesters carried signs stating “Greenland is not for sale” and “We shape our future.”

The dispute has added to diplomatic tensions between the United States and European allies, with no indication so far that negotiations will bridge the gap.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
IBSEA and World Environment Council

New Delhi: The International Business Startup and Entrepreneurs Association (IBSEA) and the World Environment Council (WEC) signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on National Startup Day in New Delhi, marking a step toward promoting green entrepreneurship and sustainability-led innovation in India.

The MoU was signed at Laghu Udyog Bharti, with the collaboration aligned to the national vision of Viksit Bharat 2047. The partnership aims to integrate environmental sustainability into the growth of startups and micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs), with a focus on expanding outreach in Tier II and Tier III cities.

IBSEA, a national-level organisation operating through 21 specialised councils, works to support entrepreneurs, startups and MSMEs across sectors. The association focuses on capacity building, policy engagement and enabling inclusive economic development. The initiative is led by Dr. Anshuman Singh, Chairman of IBSEA, who has been actively involved in promoting entrepreneurship and startup ecosystems across the country.

The World Environment Council, represented by its Founder and President Prof. Ganesh Channa, brings expertise in environmental conservation, climate action, sustainability education and global environmental advocacy. Under the MoU, IBSEA and WEC will jointly promote green startups, sustainability-driven business models, ESG awareness, and entrepreneurship training programmes.

Addressing the gathering, Prof. Channa outlined WEC’s initiatives and stressed the role of startups in addressing environmental challenges. He highlighted the importance of responsible innovation, climate-conscious enterprises and youth-led sustainability initiatives in building a resilient economy.

The event was attended by entrepreneurs, industry representatives and stakeholders, including Dr. Ruhi Banergee and PVR Murthy, who have been associated with startup development and sustainability-focused initiatives.

According to both organisations, the collaboration will also encourage policy dialogue and awareness programmes aimed at aligning business growth with environmental responsibility. The partnership seeks to position startups as key contributors to India’s long-term development goals while supporting ecological stewardship.

The MoU reflects a broader effort to link entrepreneurship with sustainability as India moves toward its 2047 development vision.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Our News Portal

We provide accurate, balanced, and impartial coverage of national and international affairs, focusing on the activities and developments within the parliament and its surrounding political landscape. We aim to foster informed public discourse and promote transparency in governance through our news articles, features, and opinion pieces.

Newsletter

Laest News

@2023 – All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by The Parliament News

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
-
00:00
00:00
Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00