Home Tags Posts tagged with "War"
Tag:

War

A dramatic escalation in Middle East tensions unfolded as the United States conducted airstrikes on three suspected Iranian nuclear sites, prompting a fierce retaliation from Iran. Within hours, Tehran launched at least 40 missiles targeting Israel — including its most powerful Khorramshahr-4 missile — marking one of the most significant flare-ups in the ongoing conflict.

US Airstrikes Target Iranian Nuclear Facilities
According to reports, US bomber jets struck three high-value Iranian sites believed to be linked to Tehran’s nuclear ambitions. Though details remain classified, the targets are understood to include facilities central to uranium enrichment and nuclear weapons development. The strikes signaled a major shift in Washington’s posture, following weeks of deliberation over potential intervention.

Iran Responds with Khorramshahr-4 Missile Attack
The Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) confirmed the launch of over 40 missiles in retaliation, including the Khorramshahr-4 — Iran’s most formidable missile with a 2,000-km range and a 1,500-kg payload capacity. Iranian state TV broadcasted footage of the missile, claiming it had been deployed in today’s assault.

Also known as Kheibar, the missile is capable of carrying multiple warheads and is named after the city of Khorramshahr, a historic site from the Iraq-Iran War. Its alternate name references a fortress seized in the 7th century — further underscoring the symbolic dimensions of the strike.

Civilian Impact: Tel Aviv Under Attack
Missiles struck several civilian areas in northern Tel Aviv, including a shopping centre, a bank, and a salon. An NDTV journalist on ground reported shattered storefronts, broken gates, and glass strewn across the streets. Rescuers confirmed at least 11 injuries so far.

One local resident recounted how his first-floor home was destroyed in the blast. Fortunately, he was unharmed, having left for his mother’s home earlier.

Emergency Response in Full Swing
Israeli security and emergency agencies have sealed off affected zones and deployed earthmovers to clear debris. Several streets remain closed as responders manage the aftermath of the attack.

The back-to-back strikes by the US and Iran mark a dangerous new phase in an already volatile region. With powerful missiles and strategic assets now in play, the risk of a full-scale war has risen significantly — making international mediation and de-escalation efforts more urgent than ever.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

As the Israel-Iran conflict intensifies, US President Donald Trump has expressed skepticism over the feasibility of a ceasefire. While voicing support for peace talks, Trump admitted that Israel’s strikes on Iran would be “very hard to stop,” highlighting the complexities surrounding diplomatic intervention in an escalating regional conflict.

Trump: Ceasefire Difficult as Israel Gains Upper Hand
Speaking to reporters, Trump emphasized that the current momentum in Israel’s military operations makes it difficult to halt hostilities. “Israel’s doing well in terms of war. And I think, you would say that Iran is doing less well,” he said. “It’s a little bit hard to get somebody to stop.”

While acknowledging that ceasefire discussions are ongoing, Trump stressed that progress is complicated by the battlefield dynamics. “If somebody is winning, it’s a little bit harder to do than if somebody is losing,” he remarked.

US Position: Support for Talks, No Immediate Military Action
The White House recently stated that Trump sees a “substantial chance of negotiations” and has requested more time to assess whether US forces should directly intervene. “We’re ready, willing and able, and we’ve been speaking to Iran, and we’ll see what happens,” he added.

Trump’s comments indicate a cautious approach, balancing diplomatic engagement with strategic hesitation on military involvement.

Contradiction on Iran’s Nuclear Intentions
Addressing comments made earlier by US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard — who claimed Iran was not actively developing nuclear weapons — Trump firmly rejected the assertion. “She’s wrong,” he said, questioning the validity of US intelligence assessments.

His remarks came amid growing concern over Iran’s Fordo nuclear facility, a heavily fortified uranium enrichment site. Trump has delayed a decision on whether to strike the facility, citing the need for further analysis and clarity on Iran’s intentions.

Israel’s “Preemptive” Strikes on Iran
Israel launched strikes on Iran on June 13, calling them “preemptive” and aimed at halting Iran’s alleged nuclear weapons development. While Iran insists its nuclear program is for civilian purposes, doubts persist in both Israeli and US strategic circles.

Trump’s latest remarks reflect a volatile and unpredictable geopolitical situation, with military dynamics, intelligence disagreements, and diplomatic complexities all at play. While the US publicly supports a ceasefire, the on-ground reality — with Israel gaining momentum — makes peace a challenging proposition in the near term.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Iran-Israel

Amid escalating Iran-Israel tensions and growing concerns over a new nuclear arms race, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) has raised alarm about the state of the world’s nuclear arsenal. The SIPRI Yearbook 2025 reveals that nine nuclear-armed states collectively possess 12,241 warheads — a dramatic indicator of the ongoing expansion and modernisation of nuclear capabilities.

Nuclear-Armed States and Warheads
According to SIPRI, nine countries currently possess nuclear warheads. Here’s a breakdown of their inventories:

  • United States: 5,177
  • Russia: 5,459
  • China: 600
  • France: 290
  • United Kingdom: 225
  • India: 180
  • Pakistan: 170
  • Israel: 90
  • North Korea: 50

SIPRI highlights that these states “continued intensive nuclear modernisation programmes in 2024, upgrading existing weapons and adding newer versions.”

Nuclear Deployment and Storage
Of the total 12,241 warheads in the world, 9,614 are in military stockpiles and are potentially available for use.
About 3,912 warheads were deployed with aircraft and ballistic missiles at the start of 2025, while nearly 2,100 were kept at a state of high operational alert — predominantly by the USA and Russia.
SIPRI notes that “China may now keep some warheads on missiles during peacetime.”

A Rising Concern Amid Conflict
The new data comes at a time when Iran’s nuclear programme and the ongoing Iran-Israel tensions have raised alarm about a potential escalation in nuclear proliferation.
Leaders from the USA and Israel have insisted Iran must not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons, adding urgency to diplomatic and strategic conversations.

As nine nuclear powers collectively hold over 12,000 warheads — many of them ready for deployment — the SIPRI Yearbook underscores a growing vulnerability in the international security environment. The ongoing Iran-Israel tensions and the weakening of arms control regimes serve as a dramatic backdrop to this growing nuclear competition.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Devastating Barrage Strikes Ukrainian Cities

In what is now recorded as the most extensive aerial offensive of the war, Russian forces launched a terrifying combination of 367 drones and missiles on multiple Ukrainian cities overnight. The attack left a trail of destruction and grief, killing 13 people—including three children in Zhytomyr—and injuring dozens more across key regions including Kyiv, Kharkiv, Mykolaiv, Ternopil, and Khmelnytskyi.

Despite Ukraine’s air defence downing 266 drones and 45 missiles, the magnitude of the assault left widespread damage in its wake. Residential areas, infrastructure, and public buildings bore the brunt of the strikes, with Khmelnytskyi alone reporting four fatalities. In Kyiv, 11 civilians were wounded as explosions echoed through the capital for the second time in just days.

Civilians Trapped in the Crossfire

Southern Ukraine’s Mykolaiv region saw further devastation when a Russian drone strike destroyed parts of an apartment building, killing a 77-year-old man and injuring five others. Images from the site showed the aftermath: a yawning hole torn through the building, windows blown out, and debris littered across the ground.

These latest attacks arrive shortly after another major drone and missile strike on Kyiv last Friday, suggesting a relentless escalation in Russian aerial tactics even as winter conditions tighten their grip on the battlefield.

Leadership Voices Global Concern

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy took to Telegram to sharply criticise what he described as a lacklustre international response—particularly pointing to muted reactions from the United States under former President Donald Trump. Calling for stronger sanctions, Zelenskiy warned that silence from the global community only serves to embolden the Kremlin.

“Every such terrorist Russian strike is reason enough for new sanctions against Russia,” Zelenskiy declared, stressing that without sustained pressure, Moscow will continue to build its military capabilities and spread violence far beyond Ukrainian borders.

His chief of staff, Andriy Yermak, echoed this sentiment, stating that Russia will persist in its aggression as long as its defence production remains unhindered.

Moscow’s Counterclaims and Ongoing Clashes

Meanwhile, Russian officials reported that they had downed 95 Ukrainian drones within four hours, including 12 near Moscow. This claim underscores the growing scale and intensity of aerial warfare from both sides, as neither shows signs of de-escalating the conflict.

Hope Amid Hostility: Ceasefire and Prisoner Swap

In a glimmer of diplomatic activity amid the carnage, Ukraine is advocating for a 30-day ceasefire to open the door for potential peace negotiations. While talks remain tentative, a significant development came in the form of a large-scale prisoner exchange, with both nations agreeing to swap 1,000 detainees each.

Though overshadowed by the brutality of recent attacks, the swap offers a brief moment of humanity amid the prolonged crisis—a reminder that even in war, dialogue remains a flickering possibility.

As the airstrikes continue and political tensions deepen, the question that looms over the global stage remains: will the world respond with urgency, or allow silence to become the accomplice of destruction?

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

A Long-Awaited Pause or Just Another Breather Before the Storm?
In a stunning turn of diplomacy, India and Pakistan—two nuclear neighbors with a long history of enmity—have agreed to a US-mediated ceasefire. Announced by former US President Donald Trump on Saturday afternoon, this ceasefire was declared to be “full and immediate.” But even before the ink on diplomatic cables had metaphorically dried, the skies over Kashmir lit up once again.

A Sudden Ceasefire Amid Chaos

The agreement was the result of intense 48-hour negotiations steered by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Vice-President JD Vance. The announcement, made on Trump’s Truth Social platform, was greeted with cautious optimism. He hailed the move as a product of “common sense and great intelligence,” congratulating both nations on “choosing peace.”

The Indian Foreign Secretary, Vikram Misri, and Pakistan’s Deputy PM Ishaq Dar confirmed the truce, stating that military commanders from both sides had spoken and agreed to halt all forms of military aggression—land, air, and sea. Military-to-military communication was scheduled to continue, with top brass planning another meeting on 12 May.

Joy Turns to Jitters in Kashmir

In towns along the Line of Control (LoC), like Uri and Poonch, the announcement sparked celebrations. Displaced families began returning to their homes, singing, and dancing in camps that had, until hours ago, echoed with sirens and cries.

But the joy was short-lived.

As dusk settled on Saturday, the sounds of shelling and explosions once again pierced the calm. Srinagar, the capital of Indian-administered Kashmir, saw rockets lighting up the sky. Both nations quickly accused each other of violating the agreement.

Indian officials alleged that Pakistan resumed fire, while Pakistani military sources claimed India had struck first.

From Escalation to Intervention

The events of the past week read like a war diary. It began with India’s missile strike on nine sites in Pakistan, which it said was in retaliation for a brutal militant attack that left 25 Hindu tourists and a guide dead. India squarely blamed Pakistan-based groups.

This tit-for-tat spiraled. Drone swarms allegedly launched from Pakistan targeted Indian cities, military outposts, and religious centers. India claimed to have intercepted over 400 drones. Then came India’s drone retaliation and, on Saturday morning, full-scale missile strikes on each other’s military facilities.

By the time Trump’s ceasefire was announced, both nations were entangled in a dangerous escalation, with cross-border strikes involving surface-to-air missiles, fighter jets, and deadly precision attacks. India accused Pakistan of launching 26 assaults on key installations like the Pathankot airbase, Srinagar airport, and civilian infrastructure. Pakistan said India had struck its bases first and named its counter-offensive: Operation Bunyan Ul Marsoos—“Wall of Lead.”

Diplomatic Tightrope

While leaders on both sides praised the ceasefire, calling it a moment of maturity and restraint, the ground reality appears far less stable. Vice-President Vance’s earlier remarks, calling the conflict “none of our business,” made the US’s sudden involvement surprising, yet it arguably prevented a full-blown war.

The ceasefire was designed to allow both sides a dignified climb-down. Indian foreign minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar reiterated India’s unyielding position on terrorism, while in Pakistan, political and military leaders celebrated what they called a dignified exit from war.

Trust Deficit Persists

However, for citizens in the border regions, who have long borne the brunt of this volatile relationship, hope is tempered by history. Lal Din of Poonch lost his home and two relatives in this week’s shelling. “We’ve seen many ceasefires before,” he said quietly. “But until the root problems are addressed, these pauses only delay the inevitable.”

As the dust barely settles, explosions continue to remind both nations—and the world—that peace on paper doesn’t always translate into peace on the ground.


Whether this ceasefire is a turning point or just another page in the long book of India-Pakistan conflict remains to be seen. But one truth stands clear: lasting peace will demand more than signatures and speeches. It will require trust, resolve, and the kind of leadership that can quiet not just the guns, but the deep wounds of the past.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

The Russian Foreign Ministry announced on Sunday that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad has stepped down and left the country, marking the end of his decades-long rule. Assad’s decision to peacefully hand over power has opened a new chapter for Syria, a nation that has endured over a decade of civil war, humanitarian crises, and geopolitical complexities.

While the announcement refrains from disclosing Assad’s current whereabouts, it underscores a potentially transformative moment for Syria’s political future.


A Peaceful Transition Amid Uncertainty

The Russian Foreign Ministry stated that Assad had given direct orders for a peaceful transfer of power. However, the absence of specifics regarding Assad’s location or the terms of his departure leaves many questions unanswered.

Russia, a staunch ally of Assad throughout the Syrian conflict, clarified that it had no involvement in the negotiations leading to this decision. Nevertheless, Moscow has urged all factions within Syria to prioritize peace and avoid violence during this transition period.


Russian Bases on Alert

As the news of Assad’s departure broke, Russia placed its military bases in Syria on high alert. However, the ministry assured that no immediate threats to these installations had been identified.

Russia has been in contact with all Syrian opposition groups, emphasizing dialogue and reconciliation. This approach aligns with its broader strategy of maintaining stability in Syria, a key ally in the region.


The Road Ahead: Challenges and Opportunities

The end of Assad’s presidency presents Syria with an opportunity for rebuilding and reconciliation. However, significant challenges remain:

  1. Political Vacuum: Without clear leadership, Syria risks descending into further factionalism and instability.
  2. Reconstruction: Years of war have devastated Syria’s infrastructure and economy, requiring substantial international support for rebuilding.
  3. Refugee Crisis: Millions of Syrians displaced by the conflict face uncertain futures, and their resettlement will be a critical issue for the new leadership.
  4. Global Diplomacy: The international community must play a constructive role in supporting a peaceful transition and ensuring that Syria’s sovereignty is respected.

Global Reactions

Assad’s departure has sparked mixed reactions worldwide. While many view it as an opportunity for a fresh start, others remain cautious about the country’s future trajectory. Key regional and global players will undoubtedly seek to influence Syria’s political landscape in the coming months.


Bashar al-Assad’s exit marks a defining moment in Syria’s history. As the nation navigates this critical transition, the focus must remain on fostering peace, unity, and rebuilding the lives of its citizens.

The coming days will reveal whether Syria can seize this opportunity for renewal or if it will face further challenges on its path to recovery. What remains clear is that the world is closely watching, ready to support—or influence—this turning point in the Middle East.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Valery Zaluzhny, Ukraine’s former Commander-in-Chief, has ignited a global conversation by declaring that World War III is already underway. Speaking at the Ukrainska Pravda’s UP100 award ceremony, Zaluzhny outlined his reasons for this alarming assessment, pointing to the active involvement of Russia’s autocratic allies as a key indicator of the war’s global expansion.

The Globalization of the Ukraine Conflict

Now Ukraine’s envoy to the United Kingdom, Zaluzhny painted a grim picture of the escalating conflict. Highlighting the direct participation of North Korean soldiers and the deployment of Iranian drones, he emphasized that Ukraine is already battling not just Russia but a coalition of autocratic states.

“Soldiers from North Korea are standing in front of Ukraine. Iranian ‘Shahed’ drones are killing civilians openly, without shame,” Zaluzhny stated, underscoring the widening scope of the war. He also cited Chinese weaponry as a growing factor, further complicating the global power dynamic.

A Call for Decisive Action

Zaluzhny’s message to Ukraine’s allies was clear: act now to contain the conflict or face its inevitable spread. “It is still possible to stop it here, on the territory of Ukraine,” he warned. However, he expressed frustration with what he perceives as a lack of urgency among Ukraine’s partners, noting that the nation is already grappling with an overwhelming number of adversaries.

His remarks come as Moscow reportedly deploys over 10,000 North Korean troops to the Kursk region, alongside increasingly sophisticated Iranian drones. These developments, coupled with Russia’s recent use of a hypersonic ballistic missile in Dnipro, signal a severe escalation in the scale and brutality of the war.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky echoed these concerns, calling the missile strike “a clear and severe escalation.”

Technological Survival, Strategic Uncertainty

While Zaluzhny expressed confidence in Ukraine’s ability to endure with advanced technology, he questioned whether survival alone would suffice in securing victory. “Ukraine will survive with technology, but it is not clear whether it can win this battle alone,” he stated, hinting at the need for greater international support.

Zaluzhny’s Tumultuous Journey

Zaluzhny’s outspoken stance comes months after his dismissal as military commander earlier this year. Once hailed as the architect of Ukraine’s defense during Russia’s initial invasion in February 2022, his relationship with President Zelensky reportedly soured over strategic disagreements. He was replaced by General Oleksandr Syrskyi, a leader perceived to be more aligned with Zelensky’s approach.

Despite his removal, Zaluzhny remains a pivotal figure in Ukraine’s military and political discourse. His warnings serve as a stark reminder of the broader stakes involved in the Ukraine conflict, urging the world to recognize the war not as a regional struggle but as a potential precursor to global turmoil.

A Critical Juncture

As the Ukraine war edges closer to what Zaluzhny calls a global confrontation, the decisions made by world leaders in the coming months could define the trajectory of international peace and stability. Whether Ukraine’s allies will heed his call for immediate and decisive action remains to be seen, but the clock is undeniably ticking.

The question now is not whether the war will escalate—it already has. The real challenge lies in whether the global community can muster the resolve to contain it before it spirals into an uncontrollable inferno.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

In the midst of the intensifying conflict in the Middle East, a chilling claim has surfaced on social media suggesting that Iran has developed a so-called “execution list” targeting key Israeli figures. This alleged list, widely shared on X (formerly Twitter), identifies Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Yoav Gallant as top targets for elimination.

The purported “kill list” is said to have been compiled by Iranian military intelligence and circulated by Iranian-affiliated X accounts. While the Iranian government has yet to officially acknowledge the existence of such a list, whispers from intelligence circles indicate that Netanyahu is Iran’s primary target, as reported by NDTV.

Who’s on Iran’s Alleged Target List?

Apart from Netanyahu and Gallant, the list includes other prominent Israeli military figures, underscoring Iran’s heightened focus on Israel’s defense infrastructure. The reported targets include:

  • Herzi Halevi, Chief of General Staff
  • Amir Baram, Halevi’s deputy
  • Ori Gordin, Major General of Northern Command
  • Yehuda Fox, Major General of Central Command
  • Eliezer Toledani, Major General of Southern Command
  • Aharon Haliva, Chief of Military Intelligence

This supposed list comes on the heels of escalating military tensions between Israel and Iran, following Israel’s elimination of top Hezbollah commanders in Lebanon. The poster closely mirrors an image shared by the Israeli military last month, which proudly displayed the names of 11 Hezbollah leaders who were killed in an Israeli airstrike.

A Ripple of Responses from Both Sides

The list’s circulation quickly gained traction after a senior Israeli officer suggested that Israel’s next target should be Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Following the killing of Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah, the officer remarked that “striking government centers and possibly eliminating figures like Khamenei” should be Israel’s next course of action.

In retaliation, Iran responded with a barrage of nearly 200 ballistic missiles targeting Israeli military facilities. While Israel reported no casualties, some of its military establishments suffered structural damage.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in response to the Iranian missile attack, called it a “big mistake” and vowed retribution: “Iran made a big mistake tonight and will pay for it,” Netanyahu declared, reaffirming Israel’s stance. “Whoever attacks us, we attack them.”

A Broader Context: Iran-Israel Power Struggle

The exchange of threats between Israel and Iran is emblematic of the long-standing geopolitical and military tensions in the region. Iran has often supported groups like Hezbollah, while Israel continues to view Tehran’s growing influence as an existential threat.

As rumors about this so-called “kill list” swirl, the question remains: Could this escalation lead to more direct confrontations between the two powers? Only time will tell, but both nations seem poised for further conflict, with no immediate end in sight.

In a conflict where every move and counter-move carries the potential for wide-reaching consequences, this latest development only deepens the uncertainty and fragility of peace in the region.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

As conflict escalates in Gaza and disruptions affect maritime traffic in the Red Sea, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince, Mohammed bin Salman (MbS), held a phone conversation to address the situation. The leaders expressed their commitment to work together for peace, security, and stability in the West Asia region.

In a post on social media, Modi stated, “Held a good conversation with my Brother HRH Prince Mohammed bin Salman… We exchanged views on the West Asia situation and shared concerns regarding terrorism, violence, and the loss of civilian lives. Agreed to work together for peace, security, and stability in the region.”

The leaders emphasized the importance of maintaining maritime security and the freedom of navigation. They reviewed the progress in their bilateral Strategic Partnership and discussed future collaboration. Modi conveyed greetings to Saudi Arabia on hosting Expo 2030 and the FIFA Football World Cup 2034.

Last week, Israel’s Prime Minister Netanyahu briefed Modi on the Israel-Hamas conflict. Recent incidents, including a drone attack on the merchant vessel MV Chem Pluto and an attack on a crude oil tanker in the Red Sea, prompted joint efforts by the Indian Navy and Coast Guard to counter piracy and drone threats.

As Houthi militants in Yemen targeted vessels in the Red Sea, India expressed support for the free movement of commercial shipping. The conflict has led to rerouting some ships navigating this crucial trade route.

The leaders agreed to stay in touch, underscoring the importance of collaboration amid regional challenges. The phone conversation reflects a collective effort to address security concerns and promote stability in the region.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

The Israel forces have surrounded Gaza City, cutting off the northern part of the territory from the south. This move comes as the month-long war has already killed more than 9,700 Palestinians and 1,400 Israelis.

The Israeli military has said that the encirclement is necessary to prevent Hamas militants from moving freely between the northern and southern parts of Gaza. However, humanitarian groups have warned that the move will further isolate Gaza City and make it more difficult to deliver aid to the hundreds of thousands of people displaced by the fighting.

The United States has urged Israel to allow for a humanitarian pause in the fighting, but Israel has so far rejected the request. US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, who is currently in the Middle East on a diplomatic mission, has said that he is “deeply concerned” by the situation in Gaza and is working with both sides to reach a ceasefire.

The humanitarian situation in Gaza is dire. More than 1.5 million people have fled their homes since the start of the war, and many are now living in overcrowded shelters with little access to food, water, or medical care. Hospitals are struggling to cope with the influx of casualties, and there is a shortage of essential supplies.

The international community must press Israel and Hamas to agree to a ceasefire and to allow for the delivery of humanitarian aid to Gaza. The people of Gaza have suffered enough.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts

Our News Portal

We provide accurate, balanced, and impartial coverage of national and international affairs, focusing on the activities and developments within the parliament and its surrounding political landscape. We aim to foster informed public discourse and promote transparency in governance through our news articles, features, and opinion pieces.

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

Laest News

@2023 – All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by The Parliament News

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
-
00:00
00:00
Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00