Author

theparliamentnews.com

Government Releases New CPI Series; January Inflation at 2.75%

by theparliamentnews.com 12 February 2026

written by theparliamentnews.com

New Delhi, February 12, 2026: The Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI) on Thursday released the first data under the revised Consumer Price Index (CPI) series, showing retail inflation at 2.75% for January 2026. As this marks the first release under the new base year of 2024, year-on-year comparisons with earlier periods are not yet available.

The new CPI series replaces the earlier base year of 2012 and incorporates updated consumption patterns from the latest Household Consumption Expenditure Survey (HCES) 2023–24. The release was made in the presence of MoSPI Secretary Saurabh Garg, Chief Economic Advisor (CEA) V. Anantha Nageswaran, and other officials.

Expanded Coverage and Methodological Changes

The revised index significantly expands coverage of goods and services. The total number of items included has increased to 358 from 299 in the previous series. Goods now account for 308 items, up from 259, while services have risen to 50 from 40 earlier.

Data collection has also broadened geographically and digitally. Rural market coverage has expanded to 1,465 markets from 1,181, while urban market coverage has increased to 1,395 from 1,114. For the first time, data from 12 online marketplaces have been incorporated into the index.

The new series provides more detailed classification, dividing goods and services into 12 broad groups, compared to six under the previous framework. Officials said this change reflects evolving consumption patterns and structural changes in the economy over the past decade.

“The economy has undergone a significant transformation in the last decade,” Mr. Nageswaran said. “Consumption behaviour, market structures, and the compositions of household expenditure have evolved and the new CPI structure unsurprisingly reflects these changes.”

Revised Weights Reflect Consumption Trends

One of the key changes in the new series is the revision of weights assigned to various categories, based on updated expenditure patterns from the HCES 2023–24.

The weight assigned to the food and beverages category has been reduced to 36.75% from 45.86% in the previous series. According to Mr. Nageswaran, the lower weight for food which is generally more volatile may reduce overall volatility in headline inflation, other factors remaining constant.

The housing category has been expanded to include water, electricity, gas, and other fuels. The combined category now carries a weight of 17.67%, compared to 10.07% earlier for housing alone.

Additional broad groups introduced in the revised structure include:

Furnishings, household equipment and routine maintenance (4.47%)
Health (6.1%)
Transport (8.8%)
Information and communication (3.61%)
Recreation, sports and culture (1.52%)
Education services (3.33%)
Restaurants and accommodation services (3.35%)
Personal care, social protection and miscellaneous goods and services (5.04%)

The weight of the paan, tobacco and intoxicants category has increased to 2.99% from 2.38%, while clothing and footwear has seen a reduction in weight to 2.38% from 6.53%.

“Since the basket is aligned with recent expenditure data, the inflation signals from this will be more closely matched to the prevailing economic conditions,” Mr. Nageswaran said. He added that the revised structure would strengthen the information base for calibrating monetary and fiscal policy.

Historical Data and Linking Factor

While January 2026 marks the first year-on-year inflation figure under the new series, MoSPI has provided index values using the revised methodology going back to January 2025. However, earlier index values are not directly available for calculating historical inflation rates.

Mr. Garg said that the government is following international practice by providing a linking factor that enables users to compute comparable index values back to 2013.

The introduction of the new CPI series is expected to influence how inflation trends are assessed by policymakers, financial markets, and researchers. With updated weights and expanded coverage, the revised index aims to better capture current consumption patterns and economic conditions.

Further monthly releases under the new series will allow clearer trend comparisons over time.

12 February 2026 0 comment

Blog Featured India

New Guidelines Issued for Vande Mataram at Official Functions

by theparliamentnews.com 12 February 2026

written by theparliamentnews.com

The Union Home Ministry has issued detailed guidelines regarding the singing and playing of the National Song Vande Mataram, stating that all six stanzas must be rendered first when the National Song and the National Anthem Jan Gana Man are performed together.

In an order dated January 28, the Ministry laid down the first formal set of protocols governing the official version of the National Song. The directive specifies that the six stanzas, which have a duration of approximately 3 minutes and 10 seconds, are to be sung at official functions including the arrival of the President, the unfurling of the National Flag, and speeches by Governors.

“When the National Song and the National Anthem are sung or played, National Song will be sung or played first,” the order states.

Occasions for singing and playing

According to the guidelines, the official version of Vande Mataram shall be sung or played, accompanied by mass singing, on specific occasions. These include the unfurling of the National Flag, cultural or ceremonial functions other than parades, and the arrival of the President at government or public functions, among others.

The order further clarifies that whenever the official version of the National Song is sung or played, the audience shall stand to attention. However, an exception has been made for instances where the song is played as part of a newsreel or documentary film. In such cases, standing is not required, as doing so could interrupt the exhibition and cause disorder rather than add to the dignity of the National Song.

The Ministry has also stated that the official version must be recited with mass singing on all occasions where the National Song is sung. It added that the song may also be sung at events that, while not strictly ceremonial, are significant due to the presence of Ministers or other dignitaries.

“The singing of the National Song on such occasions [with or without the accompaniment of instruments] accompanied by mass singing is desirable,” the order noted.

At the same time, the Ministry clarified that it is not possible to provide an exhaustive list of occasions when the National Song may be sung. It stated that there is no objection to singing the National Song with mass participation, provided it is done with due respect and proper decorum as a salutation to the motherland.

Public arrangements and coordination

The directive also emphasises logistical arrangements for ensuring coordinated singing. It calls for an adequate public audition system so that gatherings across various enclosures can sing in unison with the choir.

The order further suggests that printed lyrics of the official version be circulated among participants wherever necessary to facilitate participation.

Guidelines for schools

In educational institutions, the Ministry has recommended that the day’s work may begin with community singing of the National Song. School authorities have been advised to make adequate provisions in their programmes for popularising the singing of both the National Song and the National Anthem, while also promoting respect for the National Flag among students.

“The work in school shall begin with the playing of the National Song,” the order states, adding that institutions should actively encourage awareness and respect for national symbols.

150th year observance

The issuance of the protocol comes as the Centre observes the 150th year of Vande Mataram, written by Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay. The order represents the first structured set of official instructions specifically outlining procedures for its rendition at government and public functions.

The Ministry’s directive provides clarity on sequencing, conduct, and participation norms when the National Song and National Anthem are performed, and establishes uniformity in practice across official and educational settings.

12 February 2026 0 comment

Blog Featured India Parliament

Opposition Questions Government Over Interim Trade Agreement with U.S.

by theparliamentnews.com 11 February 2026

written by theparliamentnews.com

New Delhi, February 11, 2026: Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi on Wednesday criticised the interim trade agreement between India and the United States, describing it as “one-sided” and alleging that the government had compromised national interests. Speaking in the Lok Sabha, he said the agreement amounted to a “wholesale surrender” and claimed it affected India’s energy security and farmers’ interests.

During his address, Mr. Gandhi alleged that the government had “sold Bharat Mata” through the agreement. He argued that the deal had placed India in a disadvantageous position in negotiations with the United States. He further stated that if an INDIA Bloc government had negotiated the agreement, it would have insisted that India be treated as an equal partner.

Referring to U.S. President Donald Trump, Mr. Gandhi said an alternative government would have clearly conveyed that India must be respected as an equal in bilateral trade discussions. He emphasised that trade negotiations should protect domestic economic priorities and strategic autonomy.

The interim trade agreement between India and the United States has been positioned by the government as a step toward strengthening economic cooperation between the two countries. While specific details of the agreement were not elaborated upon during the debate, it is understood to involve trade facilitation measures and sector-specific adjustments aimed at boosting bilateral commerce.

India and the United States are major trading partners, with cooperation spanning goods, services, technology, defence, and energy. In recent years, both sides have sought to resolve tariff disputes and expand market access in sectors such as agriculture, energy, and manufacturing. Interim agreements are typically seen as transitional arrangements while broader negotiations continue.

Opposition members raised concerns in the House about the potential impact of the agreement on farmers and domestic industries. Mr. Gandhi stated that India’s energy security had been “handed over to America,” though he did not provide detailed data during his speech to substantiate the claim. He maintained that any trade arrangement must safeguard critical sectors and ensure that Indian producers are not placed at a disadvantage.

The government has not yet issued a detailed response to Mr. Gandhi’s remarks in Parliament. However, officials have previously stated that trade discussions with the United States are guided by national interest and aim to create opportunities for Indian businesses while maintaining strategic balance.

Trade agreements often involve complex negotiations over tariffs, quotas, regulatory standards, and market access. Such agreements can influence multiple sectors, including agriculture, energy imports, manufacturing exports, and digital services. Analysts note that interim deals are sometimes used to build confidence between negotiating partners before finalising comprehensive frameworks.

The debate in the Lok Sabha reflects broader political differences over economic diplomacy and trade policy. While the ruling coalition has emphasised deeper economic integration with key global partners, the Opposition has called for greater transparency and stronger protections for domestic sectors.

Further details regarding the implementation timeline and sectoral impact of the interim trade agreement are expected to emerge as discussions continue.

11 February 2026 0 comment

Blog Featured India

Opposition Submits Motion Seeking Removal of Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla

by theparliamentnews.com 10 February 2026

written by theparliamentnews.com

Amid continued disruptions in the Budget Session, Opposition parties led by the Congress on Tuesday submitted a no-confidence motion seeking the removal of Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla.

The notice was submitted during repeated adjournments and ruckus in the Lower House, which was adjourned till 2.00 p.m. on Tuesday (February 10, 2026). Chief Whip of the Congress in the Lok Sabha Kodikunnil Suresh and party Whip Mohammed Jawed Ahmed handed over the notice to Lok Sabha Secretary-General Utpal Kumar Singh, sources said.

Constitutional provision and submission

According to Article 94(c) of the Constitution, a Lok Sabha member may give written notice of intention to move a resolution for the removal of the Speaker to the Secretary-General, with a minimum notice period of 14 days.

Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi said the motion was submitted at 1:14 p.m. on Tuesday. He stated that the primary concern of the Opposition was that the Leader of Opposition had not been allowed to speak on several occasions. He added that many Opposition parties shared this concern.

“At 1:14 p.m. today we submitted a motion expressing no-confidence and asking for removal of Speaker Om Birla as per Rule 94(c),” Mr. Gogoi said in a statement.

Signatories and parties involved

The notice seeking the removal of Mr. Birla bears 119 signatures. Among the signatories are DMK MP T.R. Baalu and Samajwadi Party MP Dimple Yadav. Members of the Trinamool Congress did not sign the notice.

Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi has also not signed the motion, as one of the charges in the notice relates to him allegedly not being allowed to speak in the House.

Opposition parties that have signed the notice include the Congress, RJD, Samajwadi Party, DMK, and Left parties.

Allegations against the Speaker

The Congress has accused the Speaker of acting in a partisan manner and denying Rahul Gandhi the opportunity to speak during the debate on the Motion of Thanks to the President’s address.

The notice also refers to the recent suspension of eight Opposition MPs by the Speaker for what was described as unruly behaviour, seven of whom belong to the Congress.

Additionally, the notice alleges differential treatment by the Chair, stating that a BJP member was allowed to make personalised attacks on two former Prime Ministers, while no action was taken despite objections raised by the Opposition.

The motion further objects to remarks made by the Speaker in the House that he had “concrete information” suggesting that several Congress MPs might move towards Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s seat and carry out an “unexpected act.” The notice described this statement as an abuse of the constitutional office of the Speaker.

Separate letter by women MPs

Separately, eight women Members of Parliament from the Congress wrote to the Speaker on Monday (February 9), alleging that they were being targeted because they had “consistently fought against PM Modi’s anti-people government and demanded accountability from him.”

The no-confidence motion marks a significant escalation in the ongoing confrontation between the Opposition and the government during the Budget Session.

10 February 2026 0 comment

Blog

Budget Session Day 9 Ends in Deadlock as Both Houses Adjourn

by theparliamentnews.com 9 February 2026

written by theparliamentnews.com

Proceedings in both Houses of Parliament were disrupted on Monday, with the Lok Sabha adjourned for the day amid a stand-off between the government and the Opposition, while the Rajya Sabha took up discussion on the Union Budget 2026–27.

The Lok Sabha was adjourned after repeated disruptions following Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi’s demand that he be allowed to speak before the discussion on the Union Budget commenced. Opposition members insisted that the LoP should be given an opportunity to address the House, leading to a stalemate with the treasury benches.

According to Congress sources, Opposition parties are also exploring the possibility of moving a no-confidence motion against Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla. However, no formal notice has been submitted so far.

Budget discussion split across Houses

While the Lok Sabha remained stalled, the Rajya Sabha proceeded with its scheduled discussion on the Union Budget 2026–27. The Budget was presented by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on February 1, and formal discussions in both Houses are scheduled to continue on Monday, February 9.

The government has maintained that adequate opportunities will be provided for debate as per parliamentary procedure, while Opposition parties have accused the Chair of not allowing the Leader of Opposition to speak on multiple occasions.

Background of continued disruptions

The developments follow a turbulent previous week in Parliament. The Lok Sabha passed the Motion of Thanks to the President’s address by a voice vote without Prime Minister Narendra Modi delivering his customary reply. This occurred amid sustained protests by Opposition members over the Indo-U.S. trade deal and allegations that the Chair did not permit Rahul Gandhi to speak during the debate.

Speaker Om Birla had stated on Thursday, February 5, that he had advised the Prime Minister not to come to the House to respond to the Motion of Thanks. He said the decision was taken after receiving what he described as “concrete information” that some Congress Members of Parliament could carry out an “unexpected act” of protest at the Prime Minister’s seat.

The Opposition rejected the Speaker’s assertion and continued its protests, leading to repeated adjournments.

What lies ahead

Both Houses of Parliament are scheduled to reconvene on Monday to resume discussions on the Union Budget 2026–27. With tensions between the government and the Opposition remaining high, the smooth conduct of proceedings is expected to depend on whether consensus can be reached on demands related to speaking time and parliamentary decorum.

9 February 2026 0 comment

Blog Featured World

Clashes Erupt at Milan Anti-Olympics Protest Amid Rail Sabotage Fears

by theparliamentnews.com 8 February 2026

written by theparliamentnews.com

A protest against the Winter Olympics in Milan turned violent on Saturday evening after hours of largely peaceful demonstrations, as Italian authorities simultaneously investigated a series of suspicious incidents on railway lines in northern Italy that officials fear may amount to coordinated sabotage.

The protest began in the afternoon with demonstrators marching peacefully through Milan, holding signs, chanting slogans, and moving arm-in-arm. The march was organised by the Unsustainable Olympics Committee, an activist group opposing the 2026 Winter Olympics, and drew participants from Milan, the Lombardy region, and other parts of northern Italy.

Protesters voiced opposition to the environmental impact of Olympic infrastructure projects and criticised what they described as the economic and social consequences of hosting the Games. The organisers brought together a broad coalition of grassroots sports organisations, civic and environmental movements, student groups, housing activists, trade unions, pro-Palestinian networks, and transfeminist collectives.

Demonstrators also raised broader concerns about what they described as an “authoritarian security drift” by the Italian government and its treatment of racial minorities.

Escalation near Olympic sites

The march set off from Piazza Medaglie d’Oro and proceeded toward areas near the Olympic Village, which was secured by a large police cordon. As protesters passed close to the athletes’ housing, some individuals threw firecrackers and smoke bombs in the direction of the site. Authorities said the objects could not reach the buildings due to distance and security measures.

Tensions escalated after the march diverted onto Via Benaco and reached Piazzale Corvetto. A smaller group of protesters began throwing fireworks at police officers, prompting a police charge. Protesters later targeted police vans with additional fireworks.

Police responded by deploying water cannons and tear gas to disperse the crowd. Officials noted that not all demonstrators participated in the clashes, with many remaining in the main area of the square and not engaging in violence.

No immediate reports of serious injuries were released by authorities.

Olympic opening held amid unrest

The unrest came one day after the official opening of the 2026 Winter Olympics, which was marked by a high-profile ceremony at Milan’s San Siro stadium. The event celebrated Italy’s art and cultural heritage and featured performances by Italian tenor Andrea Bocelli and American singer Mariah Carey.

Security across Olympic venues has been heightened as Italy hosts the Games, with officials emphasising the need to ensure the safety of athletes, spectators, and infrastructure.

Railway incidents under investigation

Separately from the Milan protest, authorities are investigating a series of incidents affecting railway infrastructure in northern Italy, raising concerns about possible coordinated sabotage.

In Bologna, railway services were severely disrupted on Saturday after three separate incidents of damage were discovered. According to Italy’s rail network operator Ferrovie dello Stato and the Ansa news agency, investigators found a rudimentary explosive device placed on a switch along the Bologna-Padova line.

In addition, electrical cables were cut on a high-speed railway line, while a fire was reported at an electrical cabin in the Adriatic coastal town of Pesaro.

Italy’s transport minister said the incidents appeared to be a “premeditated attack” on the railway network. Investigators have not ruled out the involvement of anarchist groups, citing similarities to acts of sabotage carried out on French rail lines during the 2024 Paris Olympics, when high-speed train services were targeted by arson and other malicious acts.

Speaking from Bormio, where he was attending the men’s downhill ski race, Infrastructure and Transport Minister Matteo Salvini condemned the incidents, describing them as an “act of delinquency.”

Authorities have not officially linked the railway incidents to the Milan protest, but investigations are ongoing as security services assess potential threats linked to the Olympic Games.

8 February 2026 0 comment

Blog Featured World

The U.S. will remove the additional 25% tariff on Indian goods from February 7

by theparliamentnews.com 7 February 2026

written by theparliamentnews.com

The United States will remove the additional 25% Tariff on Indian goods from February 7, 2026, following commitments made by India on energy imports and defence cooperation, according to an executive order issued by the White House.

The order states that, effective 12.01 a.m. EST on February 7, products of India imported into the U.S. will no longer be subject to the additional ad valorem duty of 25% imposed earlier under Executive Order 14329.

The White House said India has committed to stop directly or indirectly importing Russian oil, to purchase U.S. energy products, and to enter into a framework with the United States to expand defence cooperation over the next 10 years.

In August 2025, the U.S. had imposed reciprocal tariffs of 25% and an additional 25% levy on Indian goods, citing India’s continued purchase of Russian crude oil. The move was linked to concerns arising from Executive Order 14066, under which the U.S. declared a national emergency related to Russia’s actions.

In the latest executive order issued on Friday local time, President Donald Trump said he had received additional information and recommendations from senior officials regarding India’s efforts to address the national emergency. He stated that India had taken “significant steps” to align with the U.S. on national security, foreign policy, and economic matters.

“Accordingly, I have determined to eliminate the additional ad valorem rate of duty imposed on imports of articles of India,” the President said, adding that the decision was necessary and appropriate to deal with the national emergency declared earlier.

The executive order also cautioned that the tariffs could be reimposed if India resumes directly or indirectly importing Russian oil. It stated that, if such imports are detected, the U.S. Secretary of Commerce would recommend whether additional action, including the reimposition of the 25% duty, should be taken.

The order authorises Secretary of State Marco Rubio to take necessary actions under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to implement the decision. It also directs all executive departments and agencies to take appropriate measures within their authority to carry out the order.

The Secretary of Commerce, in coordination with the Secretaries of State and the Treasury and other senior officials, will monitor India’s compliance with the commitments outlined in the executive order.

7 February 2026 0 comment

Blog Featured India India Parliament

Opposition Protests Lead to Adjournment of Both Houses

by theparliamentnews.com 6 February 2026

written by theparliamentnews.com

The Budget Session of Parliament on Friday was marked by repeated disruptions and political confrontation, resulting in frequent adjournments in both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha. Opposition protests prevented the scheduled business from being carried out, and both Houses were eventually adjourned for the day. Proceedings are set to resume on Monday at 11 am.

In the Lok Sabha, a general discussion on the Union Budget 2026–27 was initiated. However, continuous sloganeering by Opposition members disrupted the debate, preventing detailed discussion on budgetary proposals. Due to the sustained disruptions, most of the listed agenda items could not be taken up.

The Rajya Sabha also witnessed interruptions during the day. Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed the Upper House, where he defended the government’s economic and foreign policy approach. Referring to India’s growing engagement with the United States and the European Union, the Prime Minister described these agreements as significant for global economic stability.

The Prime Minister’s remarks drew sharp reactions from Opposition parties, leading to further protests. Several suspended Members of Parliament staged demonstrations both inside and outside the Parliament complex, alleging that the government had entered into unfavourable international trade arrangements. Some Opposition leaders described these arrangements as a “US–India trap deal”.

Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge criticised the Prime Minister’s address, alleging that the government was repeating misleading claims and avoiding accountability on key national issues.

The repeated disruptions throughout the day resulted in a substantial loss of parliamentary time. Political confrontation dominated proceedings, overshadowing substantive discussion on the Union Budget.

6 February 2026 0 comment

Blog Featured India India Parliament

Speaker Says Opposition Prepared Unprecedented Protest in Lok Sabha

by theparliamentnews.com 6 February 2026

written by theparliamentnews.com

Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla on Thursday said he had advised Prime Minister Narendra Modi not to come to the House on Wednesday, February 4, 2026, after receiving what he described as “definite information” that Opposition members were preparing to protest in an “unprecedented manner”.

Addressing the House before adjourning proceedings for the day, Mr. Birla said the behaviour witnessed in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday was unlike anything seen earlier. “With sadness I have to inform that some members displayed such behaviour in the House that had never been witnessed in its history,” the Speaker said.

The Prime Minister was scheduled to reply to the discussion on the Motion of Thanks to the President’s address at around 5 p.m. on Wednesday. However, the House was adjourned after women MPs from Opposition parties crossed the aisle and held banners in front of the Prime Minister’s designated seat.

The protests were linked to allegations made by BJP MP Nishikant Dubey against former Congress Prime Ministers. Following the disruption, the Motion of Thanks was passed by the House on Thursday, February 5, 2026, without the customary reply from the Prime Minister.

The Congress later indicated that it would allow the Prime Minister to speak only if Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi was also permitted to address the House.

Mr. Birla also reprimanded Opposition members for their conduct in his chamber after the House was adjourned until 5 p.m. on Wednesday. Congress MPs had met the Speaker to question the Chair’s decision to allow Mr. Dubey’s remarks and demanded action against him.

By late evening, the Speaker’s office expunged several objectionable remarks from the official records of the House.

The developments reflect continuing tensions between the government and the Opposition during the ongoing parliamentary session, with repeated disruptions affecting legislative business.

6 February 2026 0 comment

Blog Featured India

Don Bosco Avsar and Masoom Host Mega Job Fair in Mumbai

by theparliamentnews.com 4 February 2026

written by theparliamentnews.com

Mumbai: Don Bosco Avsar, Matunga East, in partnership with NGO Masoom, organised a Mega Job Fair on January 29, 2026, at the Don Bosco Matunga campus in Mumbai, aimed at expanding employment opportunities for marginalised youth and other job seekers.

The initiative brought together job seekers, industry representatives, non-governmental organisations, and community groups to create an inclusive employment platform focused on young people facing socio-economic barriers.

Masoom works closely with Mumbai’s night schools, supporting students who work during the day and pursue education at night. Don Bosco Avsar, operating under the Salesian Province of Mumbai, focuses on holistic youth development through career guidance, skill training, and job placement, with a special emphasis on marginalised youth.

Inauguration and vision

The job fair was inaugurated by Fr. Gregory D’Almeida, Director of Don Bosco Avsar, who highlighted the continuing relevance of St. John Bosco’s vision of empowering youth through education and meaningful employment. He noted that the event reflected the transition from education to employment with dignity and opportunity.

A short Hindi documentary on the life and work of St. John Bosco was screened during the inauguration. The film highlighted his contributions to uplifting vulnerable youth through technical training and job placement, a model that continues to guide the Salesian network globally.

Scale and participation

The Mega Job Fair provided an open platform where young job seekers could directly interact with recruiters, attend interviews, and explore employment opportunities across multiple sectors.

According to organisers:

55 companies participated, offering over 700 job vacancies

1,065 candidates attended the fair

50 per cent of participants were night school students from Mumbai

The remaining 50 per cent included college students, unemployed youth, and senior job seekers

Following preliminary interviews, 635 candidates were shortlisted for further hiring processes.

The event was supported by 106 NGOs and community organisations, strengthening outreach and mobilisation efforts. In total, 1,258 individuals, including organisers, volunteers, recruiters, and community partners, were involved in executing the initiative.

Operational support was provided by teams from Don Bosco Avsar, Masoom, volunteers from the Masoom Alumni network, and members of the Salesian community.

Focus on empowerment

Organisers said the job fair aimed to address structural barriers faced by first-generation learners and working youth, including limited access to career guidance and employment networks.

The initiative demonstrated the role of structured employment platforms, industry collaboration, and community partnerships in improving access to jobs for underserved groups. By facilitating direct engagement between employers and job seekers, the fair sought to create sustainable pathways to economic empowerment.

Don Bosco Avsar and Masoom stated that additional initiatives are planned to further expand employment opportunities for vulnerable youth across Mumbai.

4 February 2026 0 comment

Newer Posts

Older Posts

theparliamentnews.com

theparliamentnews.com

Government Releases New CPI Series; January Inflation at 2.75%

Expanded Coverage and Methodological Changes

Revised Weights Reflect Consumption Trends

Historical Data and Linking Factor

New Guidelines Issued for Vande Mataram at Official Functions

Opposition Questions Government Over Interim Trade Agreement with U.S.

Opposition Submits Motion Seeking Removal of Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla

Budget Session Day 9 Ends in Deadlock as Both Houses Adjourn

Clashes Erupt at Milan Anti-Olympics Protest Amid Rail Sabotage Fears

The U.S. will remove the additional 25% tariff on Indian goods from February 7

Opposition Protests Lead to Adjournment of Both Houses

Speaker Says Opposition Prepared Unprecedented Protest in Lok Sabha

Don Bosco Avsar and Masoom Host Mega Job Fair in Mumbai

Our News Portal

About Links

Useful Links

Newsletter

Laest News

Are you sure want to unlock this post?

Are you sure want to cancel subscription?

Queue