Home Parliament India Parliament
Category:

India Parliament

New Delhi, July 28: Proceedings in the Rajya Sabha remained stalled for the sixth consecutive day of the Monsoon Session on Monday after repeated protests by Opposition members demanding an apology from Union Home Minister Amit Shah over the police action against students protesting the alleged NEET paper leak.

The House was unable to transact scheduled business, including consideration of the Prevention of Insults to National Honour (Amendment) Bill, 2026, as Opposition MPs continued raising slogans and pressing for a statement from the Home Minister.

When the House reconvened in the afternoon, Minister of State for Home Nityanand Rai moved the Bill for consideration despite objections from Opposition members, including Pramod Tiwari, John Brittas, and Tiruchi Siva. The Deputy Chairman rejected the points of order raised by the members, but continued protests forced repeated adjournments.

Later in the day, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju urged the Congress and other Opposition parties to participate in discussions on the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026, stating that the government was prepared to debate the issue of examination paper leaks. He said the legislation was important for students and appealed to the Opposition to allow Parliament to function.

Responding on behalf of the Opposition, Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge said the Opposition was not opposed to a discussion but insisted that Home Minister Amit Shah should first make a statement in the House regarding the police action against the protesting students.

Earlier in the day, Rajya Sabha Chairman C.P. Radhakrishnan rejected multiple notices submitted under Rule 267 seeking to suspend the listed business and take up discussions on the issue. The rejection led to further protests, resulting in repeated adjournments before the House was finally adjourned for the day without conducting substantive business.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
parliament

New Delhi, July 23: For the second straight day, disruptions occurred in both Houses of Parliament as Opposition parties persisted in calling for discussions regarding the purported NEET paper leak, police actions against demonstrators in Delhi, and the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan. In the Rajya Sabha, the Opposition attempted to utilize Rule 267 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business to halt the scheduled proceedings of the day and focus on these matters.

The repeated references to Rule 267 during the ongoing Monsoon Session have brought renewed attention to one of the Rajya Sabha’s most significant procedural provisions. The rule provides a mechanism for setting aside the House’s scheduled agenda in exceptional circumstances, subject to the approval of the Chairman.

What is Rule 267?

Rule 267 is a special procedural provision available only in the Rajya Sabha. It allows any member, with the consent of the Chairman, to move a motion seeking the suspension of a rule governing the day’s listed business. If the motion is admitted and approved by the House, the scheduled agenda may be set aside temporarily to enable discussion on a matter considered to be of urgent public importance.

The provision is intended for exceptional situations rather than routine parliamentary business. It cannot be invoked where another specific rule already provides a mechanism for suspending proceedings under a particular chapter of the Rules. The Chairman exercises complete discretion in deciding whether a notice submitted under Rule 267 should be admitted.

Why Did the Opposition Seek Rule 267?

The Opposition submitted notices under Rule 267 on July 22, arguing that the alleged NEET paper leak, the reported police action against protesters in Delhi, and the demand for the Education Minister’s resignation required immediate parliamentary discussion before any other business.

Leader of the Opposition in the Rajya Sabha, Mallikarjun Kharge, urged the Chair to allow a debate under Rule 267, stating that the issues were matters of urgent public importance and deserved priority over the scheduled agenda.

The government maintained that it was prepared to discuss the issues but argued that the debate should take place under the normal rules of parliamentary procedure instead of suspending the House’s listed business.

Continued Deadlock in Parliament

The procedural disagreement continued on July 23, with repeated protests by Opposition members disrupting proceedings in the Rajya Sabha. Members insisted that discussions on the NEET paper leak, police action against protesters, and the Education Minister’s resignation be taken up before any legislative business.

As the Rule 267 notices were not admitted, the House witnessed repeated adjournments and was eventually adjourned for the day without transacting substantial business.

Similar scenes unfolded in the Lok Sabha, where Opposition members protested in the Well of the House while demanding immediate discussions on the same issues. The government accused the Opposition of disrupting parliamentary functioning despite its stated willingness to hold discussions through the regular procedural framework.

How Often Has Rule 267 Been Used?

Rule 267 has historically been invoked only in exceptional circumstances. Parliamentary records indicate that the provision was admitted only 11 times between 1990 and 2016, highlighting its limited use.

Among the notable instances was the debate on the Union government’s demonetisation decision in November 2016, when the Rajya Sabha suspended its scheduled business to discuss the issue. Another significant occasion occurred in April 2015, when the House invoked Rule 267 to debate the agrarian crisis and issues affecting farmers.

Although notices under Rule 267 are submitted frequently during contentious parliamentary sessions, they are rarely admitted by the Chair.

Is There a Similar Rule in the Lok Sabha?

The Lok Sabha does not have a direct equivalent to Rule 267. Instead, members may seek discussion on urgent matters through procedural devices such as Adjournment Motions, governed by Rules 56 to 63 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the Lok Sabha.

The recent demand from the opposition regarding the NEET paper leak underscores the significance of Rule 267 in the Rajya Sabha’s procedural context. This rule allows members to call for the suspension of scheduled business to address pressing issues, though its invocation is typically at the Chairman’s discretion. The opposition’s reliance on Rule 267 reflects a strategic approach to elevate urgent matters within parliamentary discussions. Ultimately, while the Lok Sabha employs different mechanisms for addressing urgent issues, Rule 267 distinctly characterizes the Rajya Sabha’s procedural dynamics.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Monsoon Session Day 1

The Monsoon Session of Parliament began on 20 July 2026 with high expectations. The government entered the session hoping to push forward its legislative agenda, while the Opposition arrived determined to press for discussions on a series of contentious national issues. What followed was a day marked by repeated protests, multiple adjournments, and little legislative progress setting the tone for what could become one of the most closely watched parliamentary sessions of the year.

Ahead of the session, Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed the media outside Parliament, urging Members of Parliament across party lines to work together for a productive Monsoon Session. Stressing the importance of constructive debate, he highlighted India’s recent achievements in infrastructure, manufacturing, and other sectors while emphasizing that Parliament should remain focused on issues affecting citizens and national development.

The message was clear: the government wanted the session to begin with legislative business rather than political confrontation.

As soon as both Houses assembled, it became evident that the Opposition had different priorities.

Opposition MPs raised slogans and demanded immediate discussions on several issues they described as matters of urgent public importance. Their primary demands included a debate on the NEET controversy, allegations surrounding Ram Temple donations, and other political concerns that they argued deserved precedence over the government’s legislative agenda.

With members continuing their protests, normal proceedings could not begin as scheduled.

The Lok Sabha witnessed repeated interruptions almost immediately after convening. Appeals from the Chair for members to return to their seats had little effect as slogan-shouting continued. Question Hour and other scheduled business could not proceed, forcing the House to be adjourned multiple times throughout the day.

The Rajya Sabha experienced a similar situation. Repeated attempts to resume proceedings were met with fresh protests, leaving the Chair with little option but to adjourn the House as well.

By the end of the day, both Houses had lost valuable parliamentary time, and the government’s legislative agenda remained largely untouched.

While the repeated adjournments became the day’s headline, the disruptions were driven by deeper political disagreements.

The Opposition demanded a detailed discussion on the NEET issue, arguing that concerns surrounding the examination required immediate parliamentary attention. Several Opposition leaders called for accountability and sought a dedicated debate before the House moved on to other business.

Another issue raised during the protests related to allegations concerning donations collected for the Ram Temple. Opposition parties sought an official discussion on the matter, making it one of the central flashpoints of the day.

Questions surrounding delimitation, governance, and proposed legislative measures also featured prominently in the Opposition’s demands. Collectively, these issues shaped the confrontational atmosphere that prevailed throughout the session’s opening day.

Outside Parliament, Protests Continued

The political activity was not confined to the chambers of Parliament.

Demonstrations outside the Parliament complex added another dimension to the day’s events, with protesters voicing support for various Opposition demands. Security arrangements were strengthened as police managed crowds and restricted access near key entry points, underscoring the intensity of the political atmosphere beyond the House.

Day 1 highlighted the contrasting objectives of the two sides.

The government sought to begin the Monsoon Session by advancing its legislative programme and appealed for orderly debate. The Opposition, meanwhile, maintained that pressing national controversies required immediate discussion before any legislative business could move forward.

This difference in priorities resulted in a parliamentary stalemate, where neither side achieved its immediate objective.

The opening day of the Monsoon Session demonstrated that the coming weeks are likely to be politically charged. Rather than focusing on legislation, the first day became a contest over what Parliament’s priorities should be.

Repeated adjournments reflected not just procedural disruption but also the broader political contest between the government and the Opposition. As both sides remained firm in their positions, the likelihood of further confrontations in the days ahead appeared strong.

With several important Bills expected during the Monsoon Session and the Opposition showing no signs of backing down from its demands, the opening day’s events may only be the beginning of a larger parliamentary showdown.

Whether the government and the Opposition can find common ground or whether repeated disruptions continue to overshadow legislative business will shape not only the remainder of the session but also the broader political narrative in the weeks to come.

For now, Day 1 will be remembered less for the business Parliament conducted and more for the political battle that unfolded before any meaningful legislative work could begin.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
parliament

The upcoming Monsoon Session of Parliament, expected to commence in the last week of July, is likely to focus on an extensive legislative agenda, with five new bills and two pending bills expected to be taken up for consideration and passage, according to sources familiar with the proposed schedule.

The government is also expected to brief political parties on the legislative agenda during the customary all-party meeting ahead of the session.

Constitution Amendment Bills Not Yet on Tentative Agenda

According to sources, the tentative legislative agenda does not currently include any Constitution Amendment Bills.

There has been speculation regarding proposed constitutional amendments relating to delimitation and the Women’s Reservation framework. However, sources indicate that the government may proceed with such measures only after assessing the availability of the required two-thirds majority in Parliament.

Separately, there has also been discussion about possible Constitution Amendment Bills concerning the ‘One Nation, One Election’ proposal and provisions relating to elected representatives facing imprisonment. These proposals have not been included in the tentative agenda announced so far.

Pending Bills Expected to Return

Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026

One of the key pending legislations is the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026, which was introduced in the Lok Sabha on March 25, 2026.

The proposed amendments seek to strengthen transparency and oversight in the regulation of foreign contributions received by individuals and organisations in India.

The bill is expected to be taken up for discussion and passage during the Monsoon Session.

Viksit Bharat Education Establishment Bill, 2025

The Viksit Bharat Education Establishment Bill, 2025, introduced in December 2025, was referred to a Joint Committee of Parliament for detailed examination.

Further consideration of the bill is expected after the committee submits its report during the upcoming session.

New Bills Likely to Be Introduced

Among the proposed new legislations, two bills are expected to replace ordinances promulgated earlier.

Income Tax (Amendment) Bill, 2026

The proposed Income Tax (Amendment) Bill, 2026 will replace an earlier ordinance.

According to the government, the legislation aims to strengthen India’s sovereign debt market, improve market liquidity, attract global capital flows, and support financial stability amid global geopolitical uncertainties, volatile crude oil prices, and supply chain disruptions.

Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026

This bill seeks to increase the sanctioned strength of Supreme Court judges from 33 to 37, excluding the Chief Justice of India.

The proposed expansion is intended to help reduce the backlog of pending cases and improve the timely disposal of matters before the country’s highest court.

Registration of Births and Deaths (Amendment) Bill, 2026

The bill proposes amendments to Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969.

The objective is to introduce stricter and more streamlined procedures for the delayed registration of births and deaths.

Prevention of Insults to National Honour (Amendment) Bill, 2026

The proposed legislation seeks to amend the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971.

It aims to strengthen legal provisions concerning acts that disrespect national symbols or undermine national honour.

MSME Development (Amendment) Bill, 2026

The Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (Amendment) Bill, 2026 seeks to promote ease of doing business and trust-based regulation within the MSME sector.

The proposed amendments are expected to strengthen mechanisms for addressing delayed payments to MSMEs while providing greater implementation powers to state governments.

Supplementary Demands for Grants

Apart from legislative business, the government is also expected to present the Demands for Supplementary Grants for parliamentary discussion and approval.

Members of Parliament will debate and vote on the additional expenditure proposals as part of the government’s financial business during the session.

Session Expected to Be Legislatively Significant

The Monsoon Session is expected to feature discussions on economic reforms, judicial administration, education, governance, and regulatory changes affecting multiple sectors.

While the tentative legislative agenda provides an indication of the government’s priorities, the final List of Business will be released before the session begins and may be revised based on parliamentary requirements.

Key Bills at a Glance

  • Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026 (Pending)
  • Viksit Bharat Education Establishment Bill, 2025 (Pending)
  • Income Tax (Amendment) Bill, 2026
  • Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026
  • Registration of Births and Deaths (Amendment) Bill, 2026
  • Prevention of Insults to National Honour (Amendment) Bill, 2026
  • MSME Development (Amendment) Bill, 2026

Note: The above legislative agenda is based on information from sources. The final List of Business for the Monsoon Session will be confirmed by the Government before Parliament convenes.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Parliament

The Government of India has announced that the Monsoon Session of Parliament will be held from July 20 to August 13, 2026, following approval by President Droupadi Murmu on the recommendation of the government. As one of the three regular parliamentary sessions held each year, the Monsoon Session serves as a crucial platform for introducing legislation, debating national issues, and holding the government accountable.

While the official legislative agenda will be released closer to the session, the announcement has already sparked discussions about what Parliament could prioritize in the coming weeks. From pending bills to economic reforms and political debates, here’s what to expect from the Monsoon Session 2026.

Why the Monsoon Session Matters

The Monsoon Session comes at an important point in the parliamentary calendar. Unlike the Budget Session, which is primarily focused on financial legislation, the Monsoon Session often provides the government with an opportunity to push forward pending bills and introduce new policy initiatives.

It is also a significant period for parliamentary oversight. Through Question Hour, Zero Hour, debates, and committee discussions, Members of Parliament have the opportunity to scrutinize government policies, seek accountability, and raise issues affecting citizens across the country.

For businesses, investors, and policy observers, this session can provide early indications of the government’s legislative priorities for the remainder of the year.

Key Bills to Watch

At the time of writing, the government has not released the complete list of bills scheduled for discussion during the session. However, political observers expect Parliament to take up a mix of pending legislation and fresh proposals across several sectors.

Areas that could receive legislative attention include:

  • Economic and financial reforms
  • Digital governance and emerging technologies
  • Infrastructure and urban development
  • Administrative and regulatory reforms
  • Social welfare and public service delivery

The final agenda will become clearer once the government publishes the official List of Business ahead of the session.

Major Issues Likely to Dominate Debate

Although the legislative business remains to be finalized, several national issues are expected to feature prominently during discussions.

Economy and Inflation

Economic growth, inflation, fiscal management, and employment are likely to remain central topics. Members may seek updates on government measures aimed at supporting growth while managing price pressures and maintaining fiscal stability.

Employment and Skill Development

Job creation continues to be an important public concern. Parliament may witness discussions on employment generation, skill development initiatives, startups, manufacturing, and opportunities for young professionals.

Agriculture and Monsoon Preparedness

With the session coinciding with the rainy season, issues related to agriculture, crop production, irrigation, food security, and disaster preparedness could receive considerable attention, especially if weather conditions affect different parts of the country.

Infrastructure and Development

Large-scale infrastructure projects, transportation networks, urban development, and public investment are expected to remain key discussion points as the government continues its long-term development agenda.

Digital Governance and Technology

India’s rapidly evolving digital economy has made technology policy increasingly important. Parliament could debate topics such as artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, data governance, digital public infrastructure, and online safety.

National Security and Foreign Policy

Depending on domestic and international developments, Members of Parliament may also discuss national security, border management, defence preparedness, and India’s diplomatic engagements.

What Role Will the Opposition Play?

The Monsoon Session is expected to witness active participation from opposition parties, who are likely to raise questions on governance, economic performance, public welfare, and other pressing national concerns.

Parliamentary debates often provide an opportunity for both the government and the opposition to present their perspectives, challenge policy decisions, and seek greater accountability through structured discussions.

The extent of cooperation or confrontation between the two sides will play an important role in determining the productivity of the session.

What Should Citizens Watch?

While parliamentary proceedings may appear distant from everyday life, many discussions can have a direct impact on citizens.

Readers should keep an eye on:

  • New legislation that could affect businesses and consumers
  • Announcements related to welfare programmes
  • Policy changes impacting education, employment, or healthcare
  • Economic reforms and regulatory changes
  • Updates on infrastructure and public services

The debates held during this session could shape government policy for the months ahead.

Looking Back: Building on Previous Sessions

Each parliamentary session builds upon unfinished legislative business from earlier sittings. The Monsoon Session provides an opportunity to revisit pending bills, continue policy discussions, and address emerging national issues that have gained prominence since the Budget Session.

It also serves as an important measure of Parliament’s effectiveness, with observers closely tracking legislative productivity, the quality of debates, and the ability of both the government and the opposition to engage constructively.

Final Thoughts

With Parliament set to convene from July 20 to August 13, the Monsoon Session 2026 is expected to be more than just another legislative calendar event. It offers the government a chance to advance its policy agenda, the opposition an opportunity to scrutinize decisions, and Parliament as a whole the responsibility of debating issues that matter to millions of Indians.

As the official legislative agenda is announced in the coming days, attention will shift from the session’s schedule to the substance of the debates and decisions that could shape India’s policy landscape for the rest of the year.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Lok Sabha

Both Houses of Parliament were adjourned on Thursday, with the ongoing Budget Session set to reconvene on April 16 after a scheduled recess.

Key Legislation Passed in Lok Sabha

The Lok Sabha passed the Central Armed Police Forces (General Administration) Bill, 2026, by voice vote. The legislation had earlier been approved by the Rajya Sabha.

The Bill outlines provisions related to deputation in senior ranks within Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs). It mandates that 50% of posts at the rank of Inspector General be filled through deputation, while at least 67% of Additional Director General posts are to be filled in a similar manner. Positions at the ranks of Special Director General and Director General are to be filled entirely through deputation.

Rajya Sabha Clears Jan Vishwas Amendment Bill

The Rajya Sabha passed the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Bill by voice vote. The legislation proposes wide-ranging changes across multiple laws.

It aims to amend 784 provisions across 79 Central Acts administered by 23 ministries. Of these, 717 provisions are set to be decriminalised, while 67 provisions are to be modified, with the objective of improving regulatory compliance and facilitating ease of living.

Amaravati Recognised as Andhra Pradesh Capital

Parliament also passed a Bill recognising Amaravati as the sole and permanent capital of Andhra Pradesh. The Rajya Sabha approved the legislation by voice vote, with support from most political parties, while the YSR Congress Party opposed the measure.

Session to Reconvene for Constitutional Amendments

Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju confirmed that the Budget Session would not be adjourned sine die but placed in recess.

He stated that Parliament would reconvene for a specific period to consider amendments related to the Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, commonly referred to as the Women’s Reservation Act, 2023.

Legislative Activity Continues

The session saw the passage of several key bills across both Houses, reflecting ongoing legislative activity on administrative reforms, governance frameworks, and policy implementation.

The reconvening of Parliament later in April is expected to focus on constitutional and legislative priorities currently under consideration.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Finance Bill 2026 Passed in Lok Sabha

New Delhi: The Lok Sabha passed the Finance Bill, 2026, marking a key legislative step required to implement proposals outlined in the Union Budget for 2026–27.

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman addressed the House during the discussion on the Bill, which was later approved through a voice vote. The legislation provides legal backing for changes in income tax rates, as well as revisions in customs and excise duties.

Opposition Raises Concerns

Several Opposition members opposed the introduction of the Bill, raising concerns over specific provisions. Among those who spoke against it were Manish Tewari, Sougata Ray, and T Sumathy.

They argued that certain provisions in the proposed legislation could weaken aspects of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) regulations. The government, however, proceeded with the passage of the Bill.

Protest Over LPG Supply Concerns

Outside Parliament, Opposition leaders staged a protest within the Parliament House complex over concerns related to a reported LPG supply crunch linked to the ongoing conflict in West Asia.

Leaders including Mallikarjun Kharge, Supriya Sule, Dharmendra Yadav, Sudama Prasad, T Sumathy, and Mahua Maji were among those present near the Makar Dwar during the demonstration.

All-Party Meeting on West Asia Crisis

Amid rising concerns over the geopolitical situation in West Asia, Union Home Minister Amit Shah is scheduled to chair an all-party meeting later in the day.

The meeting aims to brief political leaders on the evolving situation and its potential economic and security implications for India. The initiative follows remarks by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in both Houses of Parliament, where he described the situation as an unprecedented crisis with possible long-term effects.

The government’s outreach to political parties comes as global developments continue to influence energy markets and domestic supply concerns.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Lok Sabha Passes Appropriation Bill 2026

The Lok Sabha passed the Appropriation Bill 2026 following several adjournments triggered by protests from Opposition members. The Bill authorises the government to withdraw additional funds from the Consolidated Fund of India to meet expenditure for the financial year 2025–26.

The passage of the Bill came after the House approved the Supplementary Demands for Grants through a voice vote. These demands allow the government to seek additional financial allocations beyond the budget estimates for the ongoing financial year.

During the discussion, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman announced the creation of an Economic Stabilisation Fund worth ₹1 lakh crore. The fund is intended to provide fiscal flexibility and enable the government to respond to global economic challenges that may affect the Indian economy.

According to the Finance Minister, the proposed fund will create fiscal space that can be used if global developments place pressure on economic stability. The initiative is aimed at strengthening the government’s capacity to manage economic risks arising from international developments.

Meanwhile, members of the Opposition coalition submitted a notice in both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha seeking the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. The notice marks the first time such a proposal has been submitted in Parliament against a sitting Chief Election Commissioner.

The notice was signed by 130 Members of Parliament from the Lok Sabha and 63 members from the Rajya Sabha. It lists several allegations related to the conduct of the Chief Election Commissioner during his tenure.

The charges mentioned in the notice include claims of partisan conduct, discriminatory actions in office, obstruction of investigations related to electoral irregularities, and allegations of disenfranchisement of voters. The proposal seeks parliamentary consideration of these claims under the constitutional process governing the removal of an Election Commissioner.

Separately, the Lok Sabha also witnessed a heated exchange during the discussion on the supplementary demands for grants. Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi raised allegations concerning Union Minister Hardeep Singh Puri during his speech in the House.

The remarks led to a confrontation between Mr. Gandhi and Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, resulting in disruptions during the proceedings. The exchange contributed to repeated interruptions in the House before legislative business resumed.

Despite the disruptions, the government was able to complete the passage of the Appropriation Bill, allowing the authorised funds to be withdrawn for government expenditure for the financial year 2025–26.

The developments reflect continuing political disagreements between the government and Opposition parties during the current parliamentary session, with debates focusing on financial legislation as well as institutional issues raised by Opposition members.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Parliament Budget Session

The Budget Session of Parliament on Friday was marked by repeated disruptions and political confrontation, resulting in frequent adjournments in both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha. Opposition protests prevented the scheduled business from being carried out, and both Houses were eventually adjourned for the day. Proceedings are set to resume on Monday at 11 am.

In the Lok Sabha, a general discussion on the Union Budget 2026–27 was initiated. However, continuous sloganeering by Opposition members disrupted the debate, preventing detailed discussion on budgetary proposals. Due to the sustained disruptions, most of the listed agenda items could not be taken up.

The Rajya Sabha also witnessed interruptions during the day. Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed the Upper House, where he defended the government’s economic and foreign policy approach. Referring to India’s growing engagement with the United States and the European Union, the Prime Minister described these agreements as significant for global economic stability.

The Prime Minister’s remarks drew sharp reactions from Opposition parties, leading to further protests. Several suspended Members of Parliament staged demonstrations both inside and outside the Parliament complex, alleging that the government had entered into unfavourable international trade arrangements. Some Opposition leaders described these arrangements as a “US–India trap deal”.

Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge criticised the Prime Minister’s address, alleging that the government was repeating misleading claims and avoiding accountability on key national issues.

The repeated disruptions throughout the day resulted in a substantial loss of parliamentary time. Political confrontation dominated proceedings, overshadowing substantive discussion on the Union Budget.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Lok Sabha

Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla on Thursday said he had advised Prime Minister Narendra Modi not to come to the House on Wednesday, February 4, 2026, after receiving what he described as “definite information” that Opposition members were preparing to protest in an “unprecedented manner”.

Addressing the House before adjourning proceedings for the day, Mr. Birla said the behaviour witnessed in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday was unlike anything seen earlier. “With sadness I have to inform that some members displayed such behaviour in the House that had never been witnessed in its history,” the Speaker said.

The Prime Minister was scheduled to reply to the discussion on the Motion of Thanks to the President’s address at around 5 p.m. on Wednesday. However, the House was adjourned after women MPs from Opposition parties crossed the aisle and held banners in front of the Prime Minister’s designated seat.

The protests were linked to allegations made by BJP MP Nishikant Dubey against former Congress Prime Ministers. Following the disruption, the Motion of Thanks was passed by the House on Thursday, February 5, 2026, without the customary reply from the Prime Minister.

The Congress later indicated that it would allow the Prime Minister to speak only if Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi was also permitted to address the House.

Mr. Birla also reprimanded Opposition members for their conduct in his chamber after the House was adjourned until 5 p.m. on Wednesday. Congress MPs had met the Speaker to question the Chair’s decision to allow Mr. Dubey’s remarks and demanded action against him.

By late evening, the Speaker’s office expunged several objectionable remarks from the official records of the House.

The developments reflect continuing tensions between the government and the Opposition during the ongoing parliamentary session, with repeated disruptions affecting legislative business.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts

Our News Portal

We provide accurate, balanced, and impartial coverage of national and international affairs, focusing on the activities and developments within the parliament and its surrounding political landscape. We aim to foster informed public discourse and promote transparency in governance through our news articles, features, and opinion pieces.

Newsletter

Laest News

@2023 – All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by The Parliament News

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
-
00:00
00:00
Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00