Home Featured
Category:

Featured

T20 World Cup 2026

India defeated Pakistan by 61 runs in a Group A match of the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup at the R. Premadasa Stadium, strengthening their position in the tournament standings.

After Pakistan won the toss and elected to field, India posted 175 for 7 in 20 overs. Pakistan were bowled out for 114 in 18 overs while chasing the target.

India’s Batting Performance

India’s innings was led by Ishan Kishan, who scored 77 runs off 40 balls. His innings included a mix of controlled stroke play and aggressive boundary-hitting, helping India maintain a steady scoring rate through the middle overs.

Suryakumar Yadav contributed 32 runs, providing stability after early wickets. India’s middle order ensured the side crossed the 170-run mark despite regular breakthroughs by Pakistan’s bowlers.

Pakistan’s bowling unit managed to restrict India from crossing the 180-run mark, but the total proved competitive given the conditions.

Pakistan’s Chase

In response, Pakistan struggled to build sustained partnerships. Usman Khan was the top scorer with 44 runs, but wickets at regular intervals limited the team’s momentum.

India’s bowling attack maintained pressure throughout the innings. Hardik Pandya, Jasprit Bumrah, Varun Chakravarthy, and Axar Patel shared the wickets, preventing Pakistan from establishing control during the chase.

Pakistan were eventually bowled out for 114 in the 18th over, handing India a comprehensive victory.

Tournament Context

The win strengthens India’s position in Group A and improves their net run rate. In ICC tournaments, India–Pakistan fixtures are among the most closely followed matches globally, often carrying significant implications for group standings.

For Pakistan, the loss increases pressure in the remaining group-stage matches, where results will determine qualification for the knockout rounds.

Player of the Match

Ishan Kishan was named Player of the Match for his 77-run innings, which set the foundation for India’s total.

The result adds another chapter to the long-standing cricket rivalry between the two sides and sets up heightened interest in the remaining fixtures of the tournamen

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
India AI Impact Summit 2026

The Government of India is aiming to announce “at least fifteen” tangible outcomes at the upcoming India AI Impact Summit 2026, scheduled to be held from February 16 to 20 in New Delhi. A senior official from the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) said the summit has been designed to move beyond discussions and produce measurable deliverables.

The event, expected to be one of the largest global gatherings focused on artificial intelligence, will see participation from representatives of more than 100 countries. Heads of state or government from Brazil, France, Spain, Greece, Estonia, Finland, Croatia, Switzerland and Slovakia are among those expected to attend.

Focus on Deliverables

According to Abhishek Singh, Additional Secretary at MeitY, the summit has been structured with a clear emphasis on outcomes.

“When we started planning the summit, we got a clear direction from our honourable Prime Minister that this should not be only a ‘talking shop’ wherein experts come and give lectures on all the subjects and nothing happens,” Mr. Singh said in a video released by the Ministry this week.

He added that the government was focused on ensuring tangible deliverables. “The final deliverables will be announced at the summit, but there will be at least fifteen concrete ones,” he said.

Officials have not yet disclosed the full list of outcomes, but they indicated that the announcements will span multiple sectors linked to artificial intelligence development, governance and infrastructure.

Large-Scale Global Participation

The summit will be hosted at Bharat Mandapam, the exposition centre that hosted the G20 Summit. The government has made arrangements to accommodate more than 1.5 lakh visitors, and officials indicated that attendance could match or even exceed the turnout recorded during the 2023 G20 event.

Authorities have announced traffic restrictions in areas surrounding the venue due to the expected large crowds. Officials also stated that summit passes were oversubscribed, reflecting strong interest from international delegates, industry leaders and researchers.

Entry into Pax Silica Initiative

One confirmed outcome of the summit is India’s entry into the US-led Pax Silica initiative. The alliance aims to strengthen resilient and secure electronics supply chains among participating countries.

India’s participation in Pax Silica is expected to align with its broader strategy to enhance semiconductor manufacturing, electronics production and supply chain security. Officials view this move as complementary to domestic initiatives promoting electronics manufacturing and digital infrastructure.

AI Governance and Multistakeholder Approach

It remains unclear whether the summit will result in the creation of a new multilateral body focused on artificial intelligence governance and ethics.

In an interview with The Hindu, MeitY Secretary S. Krishnan said that the formation of a formal international organisation similar to the International Solar Alliance is uncertain. “Whether there will be another international body like the International Solar Alliance, I don’t really know. We may not do it as a regular body,” he said.

This position aligns with India’s current multistakeholder approach to AI governance. Rather than establishing a centralised regulatory body, India has encouraged collaboration between academic institutions, research bodies and industry stakeholders.

India’s AI Safety Institute, for instance, has been launched as a virtual network of researchers from Indian Institutes of Technology and other universities. The model mirrors approaches adopted in several other countries, where AI Safety Institutes are either newly established or designated from existing research institutions.

Strategic Context

The summit comes at a time when governments worldwide are grappling with the economic, ethical and security implications of artificial intelligence. Issues such as AI safety standards, cross-border data governance, semiconductor supply chains and responsible innovation remain central to international discussions.

India has positioned itself as a key stakeholder in global AI conversations, emphasising both technological advancement and inclusive development. The scale of participation at the summit reflects growing global interest in collaborative approaches to AI governance and infrastructure.

Whether the announced outcomes will lead to long-term institutional frameworks or remain project-based initiatives will likely become clearer after the summit concludes.

For now, the government’s stated objective is to ensure that the event produces measurable, implementable results rather than remaining limited to policy dialogue.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

The United States is increasing its military presence in the Middle East amid reports that officials are preparing contingency plans for potential extended operations against Iran. According to a Reuters report citing two U.S. officials, military planners have outlined options for operations that could last several weeks if authorised by President Donald Trump. No final decision on military action has been announced. This increased focus underscores the strategic importance of the US in the region.

The Pentagon has ordered the redeployment of the USS Gerald R. Ford, a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, from the Caribbean to the Middle East. It is expected to join the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group already operating in the region. The move places two U.S. carrier strike groups within operational range of Iran, significantly increasing American air and naval capabilities, further establishing the role of the US in the strategic landscape.

This maneuver highlights the commitment of the US to maintain stability and deter threats in the area, reinforcing its pivotal role in regional security.

Growing Military Posture

Carrier strike groups typically include guided-missile destroyers, cruisers, fighter aircraft and logistical support vessels. The addition of a second carrier enhances surveillance capacity, air strike capability and layered defence systems.

The redeployment of the USS Gerald R. Ford follows its earlier assignment in the Caribbean, where it was part of operations connected to U.S. security objectives in the Western Hemisphere. Its shift to the Middle East signals a change in strategic focus amid heightened tensions with Tehran.

Officials cited in the Reuters report indicated that preparations involve planning for sustained operations rather than limited, single-target strikes. However, they did not confirm that any operation had been authorised.

Diplomatic Engagement Continues

Despite the military buildup, diplomatic channels remain active. U.S. and Iranian representatives recently held discussions in Oman aimed at exploring the possibility of renewed negotiations concerning Iran’s nuclear programme.

The talks are viewed as exploratory and intended to assess whether progress toward a broader agreement is possible. Differences remain over Iran’s ballistic missile programme and regional activities, which have long been sources of tension between Washington and Tehran.

When asked about reports of potential extended military operations, White House spokesperson Anna Kelly stated that the President considers a range of perspectives before making decisions related to national security.

Strategic Context

Tensions between the United States and Iran have fluctuated over recent years, often centering on Iran’s nuclear activities and missile development. Washington maintains that preventing Tehran from acquiring a nuclear weapon remains a core strategic objective.

The presence of two carrier strike groups is relatively uncommon and typically reflects heightened readiness. Dual-carrier deployments provide expanded operational flexibility, faster response times and increased strike capacity if required.

Defence analysts note that such deployments can serve multiple purposes: deterrence, reassurance of regional allies and preparation for contingency operations. At the same time, large-scale force movements may raise concerns about escalation.

Balancing Pressure and Negotiation

President Trump has maintained a firm public stance toward Iran, stating that all options remain under consideration. His administration has combined diplomatic engagement with visible military readiness.

Officials have emphasised that planning for potential operations does not equate to a decision to initiate conflict. Military contingency planning is a routine part of defence strategy, particularly in regions with longstanding geopolitical tensions.

Any sustained military campaign would likely have broader regional implications, including potential retaliatory actions and economic consequences affecting global energy markets.

Current Status

At present:

  • No military strike has been formally announced.
  • Diplomatic discussions are ongoing.
  • U.S. forces in the region have increased in strength and readiness.

The situation remains fluid, with developments likely to depend on both diplomatic progress and strategic assessments in Washington.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Retail Inflation

New Delhi, February 12, 2026: The Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI) on Thursday released the first data under the revised Consumer Price Index (CPI) series, showing retail inflation at 2.75% for January 2026. As this marks the first release under the new base year of 2024, year-on-year comparisons with earlier periods are not yet available.

The new CPI series replaces the earlier base year of 2012 and incorporates updated consumption patterns from the latest Household Consumption Expenditure Survey (HCES) 2023–24. The release was made in the presence of MoSPI Secretary Saurabh Garg, Chief Economic Advisor (CEA) V. Anantha Nageswaran, and other officials.

Expanded Coverage and Methodological Changes

The revised index significantly expands coverage of goods and services. The total number of items included has increased to 358 from 299 in the previous series. Goods now account for 308 items, up from 259, while services have risen to 50 from 40 earlier.

Data collection has also broadened geographically and digitally. Rural market coverage has expanded to 1,465 markets from 1,181, while urban market coverage has increased to 1,395 from 1,114. For the first time, data from 12 online marketplaces have been incorporated into the index.

The new series provides more detailed classification, dividing goods and services into 12 broad groups, compared to six under the previous framework. Officials said this change reflects evolving consumption patterns and structural changes in the economy over the past decade.

“The economy has undergone a significant transformation in the last decade,” Mr. Nageswaran said. “Consumption behaviour, market structures, and the compositions of household expenditure have evolved and the new CPI structure unsurprisingly reflects these changes.”

Revised Weights Reflect Consumption Trends

One of the key changes in the new series is the revision of weights assigned to various categories, based on updated expenditure patterns from the HCES 2023–24.

The weight assigned to the food and beverages category has been reduced to 36.75% from 45.86% in the previous series. According to Mr. Nageswaran, the lower weight for food which is generally more volatile may reduce overall volatility in headline inflation, other factors remaining constant.

The housing category has been expanded to include water, electricity, gas, and other fuels. The combined category now carries a weight of 17.67%, compared to 10.07% earlier for housing alone.

Additional broad groups introduced in the revised structure include:

  • Furnishings, household equipment and routine maintenance (4.47%)
  • Health (6.1%)
  • Transport (8.8%)
  • Information and communication (3.61%)
  • Recreation, sports and culture (1.52%)
  • Education services (3.33%)
  • Restaurants and accommodation services (3.35%)
  • Personal care, social protection and miscellaneous goods and services (5.04%)

The weight of the paan, tobacco and intoxicants category has increased to 2.99% from 2.38%, while clothing and footwear has seen a reduction in weight to 2.38% from 6.53%.

“Since the basket is aligned with recent expenditure data, the inflation signals from this will be more closely matched to the prevailing economic conditions,” Mr. Nageswaran said. He added that the revised structure would strengthen the information base for calibrating monetary and fiscal policy.

Historical Data and Linking Factor

While January 2026 marks the first year-on-year inflation figure under the new series, MoSPI has provided index values using the revised methodology going back to January 2025. However, earlier index values are not directly available for calculating historical inflation rates.

Mr. Garg said that the government is following international practice by providing a linking factor that enables users to compute comparable index values back to 2013.

The introduction of the new CPI series is expected to influence how inflation trends are assessed by policymakers, financial markets, and researchers. With updated weights and expanded coverage, the revised index aims to better capture current consumption patterns and economic conditions.

Further monthly releases under the new series will allow clearer trend comparisons over time.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

The Union Home Ministry has issued detailed guidelines regarding the singing and playing of the National Song Vande Mataram, stating that all six stanzas must be rendered first when the National Song and the National Anthem Jan Gana Man are performed together.

In an order dated January 28, the Ministry laid down the first formal set of protocols governing the official version of the National Song. The directive specifies that the six stanzas, which have a duration of approximately 3 minutes and 10 seconds, are to be sung at official functions including the arrival of the President, the unfurling of the National Flag, and speeches by Governors.

“When the National Song and the National Anthem are sung or played, National Song will be sung or played first,” the order states.

Occasions for singing and playing

According to the guidelines, the official version of Vande Mataram shall be sung or played, accompanied by mass singing, on specific occasions. These include the unfurling of the National Flag, cultural or ceremonial functions other than parades, and the arrival of the President at government or public functions, among others.

The order further clarifies that whenever the official version of the National Song is sung or played, the audience shall stand to attention. However, an exception has been made for instances where the song is played as part of a newsreel or documentary film. In such cases, standing is not required, as doing so could interrupt the exhibition and cause disorder rather than add to the dignity of the National Song.

The Ministry has also stated that the official version must be recited with mass singing on all occasions where the National Song is sung. It added that the song may also be sung at events that, while not strictly ceremonial, are significant due to the presence of Ministers or other dignitaries.

“The singing of the National Song on such occasions [with or without the accompaniment of instruments] accompanied by mass singing is desirable,” the order noted.

At the same time, the Ministry clarified that it is not possible to provide an exhaustive list of occasions when the National Song may be sung. It stated that there is no objection to singing the National Song with mass participation, provided it is done with due respect and proper decorum as a salutation to the motherland.

Public arrangements and coordination

The directive also emphasises logistical arrangements for ensuring coordinated singing. It calls for an adequate public audition system so that gatherings across various enclosures can sing in unison with the choir.

The order further suggests that printed lyrics of the official version be circulated among participants wherever necessary to facilitate participation.

Guidelines for schools

In educational institutions, the Ministry has recommended that the day’s work may begin with community singing of the National Song. School authorities have been advised to make adequate provisions in their programmes for popularising the singing of both the National Song and the National Anthem, while also promoting respect for the National Flag among students.

“The work in school shall begin with the playing of the National Song,” the order states, adding that institutions should actively encourage awareness and respect for national symbols.

150th year observance

The issuance of the protocol comes as the Centre observes the 150th year of Vande Mataram, written by Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay. The order represents the first structured set of official instructions specifically outlining procedures for its rendition at government and public functions.

The Ministry’s directive provides clarity on sequencing, conduct, and participation norms when the National Song and National Anthem are performed, and establishes uniformity in practice across official and educational settings.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Lok Sabha

New Delhi, February 11, 2026: Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi on Wednesday criticised the interim trade agreement between India and the United States, describing it as “one-sided” and alleging that the government had compromised national interests. Speaking in the Lok Sabha, he said the agreement amounted to a “wholesale surrender” and claimed it affected India’s energy security and farmers’ interests.

During his address, Mr. Gandhi alleged that the government had “sold Bharat Mata” through the agreement. He argued that the deal had placed India in a disadvantageous position in negotiations with the United States. He further stated that if an INDIA Bloc government had negotiated the agreement, it would have insisted that India be treated as an equal partner.

Referring to U.S. President Donald Trump, Mr. Gandhi said an alternative government would have clearly conveyed that India must be respected as an equal in bilateral trade discussions. He emphasised that trade negotiations should protect domestic economic priorities and strategic autonomy.

The interim trade agreement between India and the United States has been positioned by the government as a step toward strengthening economic cooperation between the two countries. While specific details of the agreement were not elaborated upon during the debate, it is understood to involve trade facilitation measures and sector-specific adjustments aimed at boosting bilateral commerce.

India and the United States are major trading partners, with cooperation spanning goods, services, technology, defence, and energy. In recent years, both sides have sought to resolve tariff disputes and expand market access in sectors such as agriculture, energy, and manufacturing. Interim agreements are typically seen as transitional arrangements while broader negotiations continue.

Opposition members raised concerns in the House about the potential impact of the agreement on farmers and domestic industries. Mr. Gandhi stated that India’s energy security had been “handed over to America,” though he did not provide detailed data during his speech to substantiate the claim. He maintained that any trade arrangement must safeguard critical sectors and ensure that Indian producers are not placed at a disadvantage.

The government has not yet issued a detailed response to Mr. Gandhi’s remarks in Parliament. However, officials have previously stated that trade discussions with the United States are guided by national interest and aim to create opportunities for Indian businesses while maintaining strategic balance.

Trade agreements often involve complex negotiations over tariffs, quotas, regulatory standards, and market access. Such agreements can influence multiple sectors, including agriculture, energy imports, manufacturing exports, and digital services. Analysts note that interim deals are sometimes used to build confidence between negotiating partners before finalising comprehensive frameworks.

The debate in the Lok Sabha reflects broader political differences over economic diplomacy and trade policy. While the ruling coalition has emphasised deeper economic integration with key global partners, the Opposition has called for greater transparency and stronger protections for domestic sectors.

Further details regarding the implementation timeline and sectoral impact of the interim trade agreement are expected to emerge as discussions continue.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Amid continued disruptions in the Budget Session, Opposition parties led by the Congress on Tuesday submitted a no-confidence motion seeking the removal of Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla.

The notice was submitted during repeated adjournments and ruckus in the Lower House, which was adjourned till 2.00 p.m. on Tuesday (February 10, 2026). Chief Whip of the Congress in the Lok Sabha Kodikunnil Suresh and party Whip Mohammed Jawed Ahmed handed over the notice to Lok Sabha Secretary-General Utpal Kumar Singh, sources said.

Constitutional provision and submission

According to Article 94(c) of the Constitution, a Lok Sabha member may give written notice of intention to move a resolution for the removal of the Speaker to the Secretary-General, with a minimum notice period of 14 days.

Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi said the motion was submitted at 1:14 p.m. on Tuesday. He stated that the primary concern of the Opposition was that the Leader of Opposition had not been allowed to speak on several occasions. He added that many Opposition parties shared this concern.

“At 1:14 p.m. today we submitted a motion expressing no-confidence and asking for removal of Speaker Om Birla as per Rule 94(c),” Mr. Gogoi said in a statement.

Signatories and parties involved

The notice seeking the removal of Mr. Birla bears 119 signatures. Among the signatories are DMK MP T.R. Baalu and Samajwadi Party MP Dimple Yadav. Members of the Trinamool Congress did not sign the notice.

Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi has also not signed the motion, as one of the charges in the notice relates to him allegedly not being allowed to speak in the House.

Opposition parties that have signed the notice include the Congress, RJD, Samajwadi Party, DMK, and Left parties.

Allegations against the Speaker

The Congress has accused the Speaker of acting in a partisan manner and denying Rahul Gandhi the opportunity to speak during the debate on the Motion of Thanks to the President’s address.

The notice also refers to the recent suspension of eight Opposition MPs by the Speaker for what was described as unruly behaviour, seven of whom belong to the Congress.

Additionally, the notice alleges differential treatment by the Chair, stating that a BJP member was allowed to make personalised attacks on two former Prime Ministers, while no action was taken despite objections raised by the Opposition.

The motion further objects to remarks made by the Speaker in the House that he had “concrete information” suggesting that several Congress MPs might move towards Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s seat and carry out an “unexpected act.” The notice described this statement as an abuse of the constitutional office of the Speaker.

Separate letter by women MPs

Separately, eight women Members of Parliament from the Congress wrote to the Speaker on Monday (February 9), alleging that they were being targeted because they had “consistently fought against PM Modi’s anti-people government and demanded accountability from him.”

The no-confidence motion marks a significant escalation in the ongoing confrontation between the Opposition and the government during the Budget Session.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Milan anti-Olympics protest

A protest against the Winter Olympics in Milan turned violent on Saturday evening after hours of largely peaceful demonstrations, as Italian authorities simultaneously investigated a series of suspicious incidents on railway lines in northern Italy that officials fear may amount to coordinated sabotage.

The protest began in the afternoon with demonstrators marching peacefully through Milan, holding signs, chanting slogans, and moving arm-in-arm. The march was organised by the Unsustainable Olympics Committee, an activist group opposing the 2026 Winter Olympics, and drew participants from Milan, the Lombardy region, and other parts of northern Italy.

Protesters voiced opposition to the environmental impact of Olympic infrastructure projects and criticised what they described as the economic and social consequences of hosting the Games. The organisers brought together a broad coalition of grassroots sports organisations, civic and environmental movements, student groups, housing activists, trade unions, pro-Palestinian networks, and transfeminist collectives.

Demonstrators also raised broader concerns about what they described as an “authoritarian security drift” by the Italian government and its treatment of racial minorities.

Escalation near Olympic sites

The march set off from Piazza Medaglie d’Oro and proceeded toward areas near the Olympic Village, which was secured by a large police cordon. As protesters passed close to the athletes’ housing, some individuals threw firecrackers and smoke bombs in the direction of the site. Authorities said the objects could not reach the buildings due to distance and security measures.

Tensions escalated after the march diverted onto Via Benaco and reached Piazzale Corvetto. A smaller group of protesters began throwing fireworks at police officers, prompting a police charge. Protesters later targeted police vans with additional fireworks.

Police responded by deploying water cannons and tear gas to disperse the crowd. Officials noted that not all demonstrators participated in the clashes, with many remaining in the main area of the square and not engaging in violence.

No immediate reports of serious injuries were released by authorities.

Olympic opening held amid unrest

The unrest came one day after the official opening of the 2026 Winter Olympics, which was marked by a high-profile ceremony at Milan’s San Siro stadium. The event celebrated Italy’s art and cultural heritage and featured performances by Italian tenor Andrea Bocelli and American singer Mariah Carey.

Security across Olympic venues has been heightened as Italy hosts the Games, with officials emphasising the need to ensure the safety of athletes, spectators, and infrastructure.

Railway incidents under investigation

Separately from the Milan protest, authorities are investigating a series of incidents affecting railway infrastructure in northern Italy, raising concerns about possible coordinated sabotage.

In Bologna, railway services were severely disrupted on Saturday after three separate incidents of damage were discovered. According to Italy’s rail network operator Ferrovie dello Stato and the Ansa news agency, investigators found a rudimentary explosive device placed on a switch along the Bologna-Padova line.

In addition, electrical cables were cut on a high-speed railway line, while a fire was reported at an electrical cabin in the Adriatic coastal town of Pesaro.

Italy’s transport minister said the incidents appeared to be a “premeditated attack” on the railway network. Investigators have not ruled out the involvement of anarchist groups, citing similarities to acts of sabotage carried out on French rail lines during the 2024 Paris Olympics, when high-speed train services were targeted by arson and other malicious acts.

Speaking from Bormio, where he was attending the men’s downhill ski race, Infrastructure and Transport Minister Matteo Salvini condemned the incidents, describing them as an “act of delinquency.”

Authorities have not officially linked the railway incidents to the Milan protest, but investigations are ongoing as security services assess potential threats linked to the Olympic Games.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
India US trade deal

The United States will remove the additional 25% Tariff on Indian goods from February 7, 2026, following commitments made by India on energy imports and defence cooperation, according to an executive order issued by the White House.

The order states that, effective 12.01 a.m. EST on February 7, products of India imported into the U.S. will no longer be subject to the additional ad valorem duty of 25% imposed earlier under Executive Order 14329.

The White House said India has committed to stop directly or indirectly importing Russian oil, to purchase U.S. energy products, and to enter into a framework with the United States to expand defence cooperation over the next 10 years.

In August 2025, the U.S. had imposed reciprocal tariffs of 25% and an additional 25% levy on Indian goods, citing India’s continued purchase of Russian crude oil. The move was linked to concerns arising from Executive Order 14066, under which the U.S. declared a national emergency related to Russia’s actions.

In the latest executive order issued on Friday local time, President Donald Trump said he had received additional information and recommendations from senior officials regarding India’s efforts to address the national emergency. He stated that India had taken “significant steps” to align with the U.S. on national security, foreign policy, and economic matters.

“Accordingly, I have determined to eliminate the additional ad valorem rate of duty imposed on imports of articles of India,” the President said, adding that the decision was necessary and appropriate to deal with the national emergency declared earlier.

The executive order also cautioned that the tariffs could be reimposed if India resumes directly or indirectly importing Russian oil. It stated that, if such imports are detected, the U.S. Secretary of Commerce would recommend whether additional action, including the reimposition of the 25% duty, should be taken.

The order authorises Secretary of State Marco Rubio to take necessary actions under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to implement the decision. It also directs all executive departments and agencies to take appropriate measures within their authority to carry out the order.

The Secretary of Commerce, in coordination with the Secretaries of State and the Treasury and other senior officials, will monitor India’s compliance with the commitments outlined in the executive order.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Parliament Budget Session

The Budget Session of Parliament on Friday was marked by repeated disruptions and political confrontation, resulting in frequent adjournments in both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha. Opposition protests prevented the scheduled business from being carried out, and both Houses were eventually adjourned for the day. Proceedings are set to resume on Monday at 11 am.

In the Lok Sabha, a general discussion on the Union Budget 2026–27 was initiated. However, continuous sloganeering by Opposition members disrupted the debate, preventing detailed discussion on budgetary proposals. Due to the sustained disruptions, most of the listed agenda items could not be taken up.

The Rajya Sabha also witnessed interruptions during the day. Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed the Upper House, where he defended the government’s economic and foreign policy approach. Referring to India’s growing engagement with the United States and the European Union, the Prime Minister described these agreements as significant for global economic stability.

The Prime Minister’s remarks drew sharp reactions from Opposition parties, leading to further protests. Several suspended Members of Parliament staged demonstrations both inside and outside the Parliament complex, alleging that the government had entered into unfavourable international trade arrangements. Some Opposition leaders described these arrangements as a “US–India trap deal”.

Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge criticised the Prime Minister’s address, alleging that the government was repeating misleading claims and avoiding accountability on key national issues.

The repeated disruptions throughout the day resulted in a substantial loss of parliamentary time. Political confrontation dominated proceedings, overshadowing substantive discussion on the Union Budget.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts

Our News Portal

We provide accurate, balanced, and impartial coverage of national and international affairs, focusing on the activities and developments within the parliament and its surrounding political landscape. We aim to foster informed public discourse and promote transparency in governance through our news articles, features, and opinion pieces.

Newsletter

Laest News

@2023 – All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by The Parliament News

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
-
00:00
00:00
Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00