Home Parliament
Category:

Parliament

Lok Sabha

Amid intensifying concerns about toxic air across several Indian cities, the government has indicated that it is prepared to hold a detailed discussion on air pollution in the Lok Sabha. Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju stated that since the Leader of the Opposition raised the matter in the Business Advisory Committee, the government must examine how such a discussion can be formally structured under parliamentary rules. His remarks suggested both willingness and procedural caution, signalling that the stage is being set for a multi-party conversation.

Rijiju reiterated that the government, from day one of the Winter Session, has been open to discussing all major national issues and considering constructive suggestions from the opposition. His comments come at a time when MPs across party lines have repeatedly flagged alarming pollution levels, especially in large urban centres.

Rahul Gandhi Calls for a Non-Ideological, Unified Response

Raising the issue during Zero Hour, Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi emphasised that the worsening air quality is a nationwide challenge, not a political battleground. He expressed hope that the topic would not be reduced to ideological point-scoring, insisting that all parties share common ground on the urgency of clean air.

Gandhi urged the government to prepare a credible national strategy to reduce pollution, and assured that the opposition, including the Congress, would support any serious effort to create actionable solutions. His insistence that the discussion move swiftly reflects the pressure many urban constituencies are feeling as health warnings intensify.

Persistent Demands from the Opposition Bloc

Opposition parties have been calling for the debate since the start of the Winter Session, arguing that air quality has reached a point where legislative intervention is unavoidable. Congress whip Manickam Tagore reiterated the urgency, telling the House that millions of citizens face a “health emergency” that can no longer be brushed aside. With particulate matter levels spiking across northern India, several MPs have echoed similar concerns.

Momentum Builds for a Full-Fledged Parliamentary Discussion

Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, acknowledging the seriousness of the matter, has already held initial conversations with both the government and opposition leaders regarding the feasibility of a focused discussion. His involvement indicates that the House is moving closer to dedicating formal time to the subject.

If the discussion proceeds, it may open the door to cross-party collaboration on long-pending reforms in urban planning, industrial regulation, transport policy, and emergency-response preparedness. For now, the tone on both sides appears unusually aligned: the crisis cannot be ignored, and the debate must happen.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Parliament Winter Session 2025 Day 9

On the ninth day of the Winter Session, Parliament delivered yet another reminder of how layered, charged and unpredictable legislative days in India can be. Both Houses convened with packed agendas, shifting seamlessly between governance, ideology, cultural identity, and political confrontation before finally adjourning for the day.

Lok Sabha: Policy, Pollution and Pointed Exchanges

The Lok Sabha opened with Question Hour and quickly moved into dense legislative business. Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman introduced the Appropriation (No. 4) Bill, 2025—an essential step to authorise additional expenditure for the current financial year. This was followed by a key procedural development: the extension of the joint committee scrutinising the One Nation–One Election proposal until the Budget Session of 2026, signalling that the government intends to take its time shaping one of its most ambitious election reform ideas.

Beyond budgetary matters, the House wrestled with issues that hit much closer to the ground. Delhi’s worsening air pollution resurfaced as a major concern, with MPs demanding a comprehensive clean-air blueprint inspired by global models like Beijing’s aggressive anti-smog strategy. Environmental debates deepened further when several members objected to proposed oil and gas exploration in the fragile Gulf of Mannar ecosystem.

The session took an unexpected turn when BJP MP Anurag Thakur alleged that a Trinamool Congress MP had used a banned e-cigarette inside the chamber—prompting Speaker Om Birla to firmly remind the House that such conduct is not permissible. The accusation triggered murmurs, counterpoints and heated interventions across party benches.

Political temperatures rose further when Rahul Gandhi launched a sharp critique of Union Home Minister Amit Shah’s earlier remarks during the electoral reforms debate. Gandhi described Shah as “very nervous” and under pressure, adding yet another chapter to the ongoing tug-of-war between the opposition and the treasury benches.

Rajya Sabha: Vande Mataram, Electoral Reforms and Spirited Interruptions

The Rajya Sabha carried its own brand of spirited debates. The discussion on the 150th anniversary of Vande Mataram continued, a session that was expected to be ceremonial but instead evolved into a clash of political philosophies.

BJP president J.P. Nadda defended the government’s cultural position, accusing Congress of inconsistency and disregard for national symbols. Congress chief Mallikarjun Kharge promptly interrupted, arguing that the conversation had drifted from celebrating Vande Mataram to attacking historical figures like Jawaharlal Nehru. The exchange underscored how cultural topics in Parliament often become battlegrounds for broader political narratives.

Parallel to the cultural debate, the Upper House continued its engagement with electoral reforms. Several BJP speakers were lined up to present their arguments on proposed changes to the electoral framework, emphasising transparency and modernisation—an ongoing theme across both chambers this session.

A Day of Unfinished Arguments and Unresolved Questions

After hours of debate, disruptions and crossfire on issues ranging from national symbols to financial authorisations, both Houses were adjourned with plans to reconvene at 11 am on Friday. The day offered a vivid snapshot of India’s democratic machinery—messy, loud, ideological, but undeniably active.

With the Winter Session entering a critical phase, these debates are shaping narratives on governance, transparency, national identity and electoral change—setting the tone for the political months ahead.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Parliament Winter Session 2025 Day 7

The day in the Parliament began with the lower house locked in a furious, nearly 10-hour debate on Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. Government lawmakers defended the exercise as a constitutionally valid, technologically enhanced method to eliminate duplicate, migrated, and deceased voter entries and ensure cleaner, more accurate voter lists. On the other side, the Opposition painted it as a selective, partisan exercise that disproportionately impacts minority and opposition-leaning constituencies calling it “vote-chori” and questioning the neutrality of the Election Commission of India (EC). Demands for transparency, full roll-verification, and independent auditing echoed throughout the proceedings.

Meanwhile, in the upper house a ceremony meant to commemorate 150 years of Vande Mataram turned into a bitter debate about national identity and cultural symbolism. The ruling alliance insisted the song be institutionally honoured for its historical role uniting freedom fighters; the Opposition countered that patriotism cannot be enforced by legislation, accusing the treasury benches of playing identity politics and ignoring urgent social and economic issues.

Overlapping with these flashpoints, the nation’s aviation system battered by repeated cancellations and passenger chaos came under fire. The Civil Aviation Ministry faced tough questions over a recent spate of flight disruptions by IndiGo. In response, the minister announced that new Flight Duty Time Limitations (FDTL) for pilots are now in force to curb crew fatigue and improve safety. The House was told airlines, including IndiGo, would face strict DGCA oversight; regulators may penalize future lapses, and a parliamentary standing committee has asked to summon airline executives and DGCA officials next week to investigate the systemic breakdown.

On internal security, the Home Ministry laid bare recent gains in the fight against left-wing extremism, reporting that since 2019, 29 top Maoist leaders have been neutralised, over 7,300 cadres arrested, and roughly 5,571 militants surrendered. According to the government, the number of “severely affected” districts has shrunk thanks to increased security deployments, better inter-agency intel-sharing, and developmental outreach. MPs pressed for details on rehabilitation for surrendered cadres and sought fresh district-wise data.

Adding another layer, Parliament’s committees revealed economic and administrative developments: public-sector banks have written off more than ₹6.15 lakh crore in bad loans over recent years, prompting opposition demands for a full disclosure of beneficiaries and recovery breakdowns. The government announced plans to shut down 25 loss-making central PSUs under its restructuring drive triggering concerns about job security, asset valuation, and possible privatization. On the taxation front, simpler income-tax return forms are reportedly coming soon, aimed at easing compliance.

Last but perhaps most explosive: the opposition bloc formally signalled its intention to bring an impeachment motion against Justice G. R. Swaminathan of the Madras High Court, citing alleged misconduct. If they secure the necessary signatures, this could trigger a major constitutional confrontation between Parliament and the judiciary.

As the Winter Session (scheduled from December 1–19, 2025) enters its second week, what began as a planned session has evolved into one of the most turbulent, politically charged sittings in recent memory with every debate, symbolic gesture, and procedural move turned into a battleground of competing narratives about democracy, governance, identity, and institutional trust.

Why Today Matters: The Stakes Are Bigger Than Politics

  • The SIR debate is about more than updating voter lists, it strikes at the heart of electoral fairness and democracy, raising questions about who gets to vote and whose votes may be discarded.
  • The “Vande Mataram” controversy illustrates how cultural and symbolic politics can overshadow substantive issues like economy, jobs, public welfare.
  • The IndiGo crisis underscores systemic vulnerabilities in essential public services and highlights the challenge of regulating large private players under public interest.
  • Security updates on left-wing extremism point to government claims of success but the call for data and rehabilitation signals continuing skepticism.
  • Economic disclosures and PSU shutdowns reflect broader structural changes, but also spark anxiety over job security and transparency.
  • The potential impeachment of a High Court judge threatens a constitutional standoff raising fundamental questions about checks and balances, judicial independence, and parliamentary power.

In short: what unfolded today isn’t just politics as usual. It is a microcosm of India’s larger struggles — about identity and inclusion, about economic reform and fairness, about institutional integrity and trust — and a clear signal that the next few months in Parliament will shape more than just laws.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Parliament Winter Session 2025 Day 5

Day 5 of the Winter Session of Parliament unfolded as a blend of legislative progress and persistent political friction. The Lok Sabha approved the Health Security and National Security Cess Bill 2025, a major fiscal move aimed at restructuring taxes on demerit goods such as pan masala. The Bill replaces the soon-to-end GST compensation cess with a new framework that the government says will channel revenue into public health and national security initiatives.

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, piloting the Bill, assured MPs that the new cess would not extend to essential goods. The intention, she said, is to ensure a sustainable revenue stream for health-related programmes and national preparedness without burdening everyday consumers.

Protests and Walkouts Shadow the Legislation

While the government pushed ahead with its tax reforms agenda, the day was punctuated by intense disruptions. DMK MPs staged vocal protests over a controversy involving a lamp-lighting ceremony at a Tamil Nadu temple, leading to repeated adjournments.

Opposition members also used the opportunity to raise a wide spectrum of concerns, including the continuing slide of the rupee, crop damage from erratic rainfall in Gujarat, and demands to update school textbooks by removing colonial labels such as “Lord” for British officials.

Zero Hour became a flashpoint for these grievances, with MPs seeking government intervention on everything from economic pressures to cultural and historical representation.

Rajya Sabha Turns Its Lens on IndiGo’s Flight Cancellations

In the Upper House, the spotlight shifted to India’s aviation sector. Opposition MPs strongly criticised IndiGo following the sudden cancellation of more than 500 flights, calling it the predictable outcome of an unchallenged “monopoly model” in Indian aviation.

The government assured the House that the Civil Aviation Ministry is reviewing the situation, with further updates expected. Alongside this, the Rajya Sabha adopted a motion to elect a new member to the Rubber Board, even as it navigated DMK notices seeking discussions on communal tensions allegedly rising in Tamil Nadu.

Growing Social and Governance Concerns Surface

MPs across party lines took the opportunity to voice concerns over emerging social issues—particularly around safeguarding children from excessive exposure on social media platforms. Calls for stronger regulation, clearer guidelines, and parental awareness dominated parts of the discussions.

Environmental concerns resurfaced too, with renewed demands for targeted action against deteriorating air quality in major Indian cities. Meanwhile, members from agrarian regions highlighted the need for timely compensation for farmers hit hard by unseasonal rains, urging expedited relief measures.

A Day That Captured the Pulse of Parliament

Despite the disruptions, the legislative agenda moved forward, underscoring the government’s focus on tax restructuring, especially reforms around “sin taxes.” At the same time, the opposition deployed a multi-pronged strategy, using every parliamentary tool available – Zero Hour, procedural notices, interventions—to amplify public grievances, critique policy choices, and demand accountability.

The result was a familiar yet telling portrait of Indian parliamentary life: legislation advancing on one side, and vigorous, often turbulent, democratic scrutiny on the other.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Parliament Winter Session 2025 Day 4

In a significant policy development, Parliament has officially passed the Central Excise (Amendment) Bill, 2025, after the Rajya Sabha approved and returned it to the Lok Sabha. The bill marks one of the most sweeping revisions to tobacco taxation in recent years, focusing not only on revenue but also on public health and long-standing concerns around affordability of harmful products.

Why the Amendment Was Needed

The amendment updates the Central Excise Act, 1944 to allow the government to raise duties on cigarettes, cigars, hookah tobacco, chewing tobacco, zarda, scented tobacco and tobacco substitutes.
One of the key motivations behind the bill is ensuring that taxation remains effective after the sunset of the previous cess structure. Without a revision, the government would lack fiscal room to maintain the overall tax burden necessary to discourage consumption.

Massive Revision of Tobacco Duty Structure

The updated duty slabs reflect a dramatic shift compared to the older system. Previously, the excise duty on cigarettes ranged from 200 to 735 rupees per thousand sticks. The new structure pushes this range to between 2,700 and 11,000 rupees per thousand cigarettes.
Other product categories also see steep increases:

  • Chewing tobacco duty rising from 25 percent to 100 percent
  • Hookah tobacco duty increasing from 25 percent to 40 percent
  • Pipe and cigarette smoking mixture duty jumping from 60 percent to 325 percent

The government’s stated objective is clear: tobacco should not remain an easily affordable product in the market, particularly when its health impact is well-documented.

Government’s Stand: Public Health First, Revenue Sharing Intact

Responding to concerns in the Rajya Sabha, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman clarified that the revised taxes will be shared with states, emphasizing that this is excise duty and not a new cess.
She also addressed apprehensions regarding farmers and beedi workers. According to the Minister, multiple schemes — especially those targeting crop diversification — are already in place to support farmers interested in shifting out of tobacco cultivation. Between 2017-18 and 2021-22, more than 1.12 lakh acres have been moved away from tobacco farming.

Additionally, nearly 50 lakh beedi workers are registered across the country, and several welfare programmes continue to operate through national labour organisations.

Aligning India With Global Standards

India’s current tax incidence on cigarettes stands at nearly 53 percent of the retail price, significantly lower than the World Health Organization’s recommended benchmark of 75 percent.
The Minister noted that even after the introduction of GST, India’s combined tax burden on tobacco products did not consistently meet global standards, making many products remain relatively affordable. This bill seeks to correct that gap and push tobacco consumption farther out of reach.

Debate in Parliament: Concern, Support and Calls for Review

The discussion saw a wide range of viewpoints:

  • Congress MP Pramod Tiwari raised worries about the effect on tobacco farmers and argued for sending the bill to a parliamentary committee.
  • TMC’s Sagarika Ghose stated that taxation alone will not reduce consumption unless accompanied by strong health awareness campaigns and tighter regulation on pan masala advertising.
  • AAP MP Sandeep Kumar Pathak questioned whether excessive taxes are the right tool to curb addiction.
  • AIADMK’s M Thambidurai supported the bill, calling it a timely reform that protects public health.

The debate also saw political exchanges, with the Finance Minister pushing back against claims from Trinamool Congress members on issues unrelated to the bill.

A Policy Shift with Far-Reaching Impact

The passage of the Central Excise (Amendment) Bill, 2025 signals a deliberate move towards stronger public health regulation backed by fiscal policy. Whether it significantly impacts tobacco consumption patterns will be seen over time, but the government has made its stance unmistakably clear: affordability should not enable addiction.

After the detailed discussion, the House adjourned, marking the close of a critical legislative day.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Parliament Winter Session day 2

The second day of the 2025 Parliament Winter Session unfolded not as a routine legislative day, but as a sharp reminder of how fragile parliamentary functioning can become when political trust erodes. What began as a normal sitting quickly spiralled into disorder as opposition parties pressed aggressively for an immediate and structured debate on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.

In their view, the SIR process risked excluding legitimate voters; in the government’s assessment, the House needed to proceed with its planned business. The collision of these two priorities defined the entire day.

Lok Sabha Gridlocked as Protests Dominate

The Lok Sabha made barely any progress before breaking into full-blown chaos. Opposition MPs marched into the Well, raising slogans that drowned out the Speaker’s attempts to restore order. Their demand was consistent and unyielding: no legislative work until the SIR issue was taken up on priority.

The Speaker attempted to move the House forward, but with the noise escalating and no breakthrough in sight, he was forced to adjourn the session repeatedly. Even when the House reconvened, the disruptions resumed within minutes, leaving the day’s agenda untouched.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Parliament

The Winter Session of Parliament opened today with a packed legislative agenda and a schedule that stretches across 15 sittings in 19 days. But the first hours inside the Lok Sabha were far from smooth. What should have been a straightforward opening quickly turned into a day shaped by loud protests, stalled discussions, and repeated adjournments.

The primary flashpoint: opposition uproar over issues including the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.
Even before Question Hour could gain momentum, disruptions overshadowed proceedings, forcing the Speaker to adjourn the House twice before noon.

Lok Sabha’s Stop-Start Morning: Protests Take Centre Stage

When the House first convened at 11 AM, Speaker Om Birla began the session with obituary references for Dharmendra, Col. (Retd.) Sona Ram Choudhary, Prof. Vijay Kumar Malhotra, and Ravi Naik. Members observed a moment of silence in their memory.

But the quiet did not last long.

As soon as Question Hour began, opposition MPs rushed into protest mode—raising slogans over the electoral roll revision and other issues. The noise drowned out proceedings, prompting the Speaker to express firm displeasure. Disrupting parliamentary functioning, he reminded members, cannot become routine.

Despite the caution, protests intensified, and the House was adjourned till noon.

Second Convening, Same Chaos: Lok Sabha Adjourned Again

By 12 PM, hopes for smoother proceedings faded quickly. The moment the session resumed, sloganeering erupted once again.

Amid the commotion, Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman still managed to introduce several key bills:

  • Central Excise (Amendment) Bill 2025 — proposing excise duty on tobacco and related products
  • Health Security and National Security Cess Bill 2025 — imposing a cess on items like pan masala
  • Manipur Goods and Services Tax (Second Amendment) Bill 2025 — amending Manipur’s GST Act

The House also formally extended the deadlines for two major committee reports:

  • Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Bill, 2025
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Bill, 2025

But with protests showing no signs of easing, the Speaker had little choice but to adjourn the House again—this time until 2 PM.

Rajya Sabha Opens with Oaths, Tributes and a New Chair at the Helm

While the Lok Sabha struggled with disruptions, the Rajya Sabha opened its day on a more composed note.

Three Jammu & Kashmir National Conference leaders—Gurwinder Singh Oberoi, Chowdhry Mohammad Ramzan and Sajjad Ahmed Kichloo—took oath as Members of Parliament.

A significant moment followed:
C. P. Radhakrishnan presided over the Rajya Sabha for the first time as Chairman.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi led the House in welcoming him, highlighting his rise from modest beginnings to the Vice Presidency as a reflection of India’s democratic strength.
The sentiment was echoed by Deputy Chairman Harivansh and Leader of Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge, both acknowledging his commitment to fairness and constructive debate.

What emerged was a rare instance of unified goodwill across party lines.

Reactions Outside the House: Leaders Speak on the Day’s Turbulence

Outside Parliament, MPs shared sharply contrasting views on the day’s disruptions.

  • BJP MP Dinesh Sharma told Akashvani News the government is “open to discussions on all issues” and that MPs will have ample opportunity to raise constituency matters.
  • JDU MP Sanjay Jha accused the opposition of attempting to derail the Winter Session the same way it disrupted the previous one, calling the protests politically motivated rather than issue-driven.
  • MoS Education Sukanta Majumdar described the opposition’s conduct as theatrics, arguing that Parliament cannot become a stage for constant drama.

The divide over the SIR issue appears set to remain one of the session’s defining points of contention.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
U.S. Government Shutdown

After weeks of political stalemate and mounting public frustration, the United States has finally turned a page. The 43-day government shutdown, the longest in the nation’s history, officially ended after Congress approved a new spending bill that President Donald Trump signed into law.

The breakthrough brings long-awaited relief to hundreds of thousands of furloughed federal employees and restores essential government services that had been paralyzed since September 30, 2025.

How the Deadlock Began

The shutdown began when federal funding expired at the end of September, following an impasse between Republicans and Democrats over health-tax credits—a policy central to keeping healthcare affordable for millions of Americans.

The dispute over whether to extend or modify these credits derailed budget negotiations, leading to a complete halt in non-essential federal operations. The shutdown’s ripple effects were felt across the country: from delayed paychecks for federal workers to stalled environmental programs and limited public access to federal institutions.

The Turning Point: Breaking Party Lines

The path to reopening the government required rare acts of political courage. In the Senate, eight Democrats crossed party lines to back an amendment that helped move the spending bill forward—on the condition that Congress would revisit the health-tax credit debate in the near future.

In the House of Representatives, six Democrats also broke ranks to support the measure: Jared Golden, Adam Gray, Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, Don Davis, Henry Cuellar, and Tom Suozzi. Their votes proved decisive in securing passage, with the final count standing at 222–209.

Interestingly, not all Republicans were on board. A few conservative members, including Thomas Massie and Greg Steube, opposed the deal, citing concerns over long-term fiscal responsibility.

What the Bill Achieves

While the spending bill does not resolve the health-tax credit issue, it ensures that the federal government can operate without further interruption. Federal employees will now receive back pay, and critical public services—from national parks to regulatory agencies—will resume normal operations.

More importantly, it reestablishes stability in the federal system after weeks of uncertainty that had shaken both domestic confidence and international perception of U.S. governance.

Beyond the Bill: The Politics of Compromise

This resolution represents more than just the end of a shutdown—it’s a moment of political recalibration. In an era defined by polarization, bipartisan cooperation has become increasingly rare. Yet, this episode proves that negotiation and mutual concession remain possible when national interests outweigh partisan agendas.

The willingness of some lawmakers to step across the aisle underscores a larger truth: governance in a democracy requires not just debate but also dialogue.

What Comes Next

The next major political challenge will center on the renewal of health-tax credits, which are set to expire in December. Lawmakers from both sides have acknowledged that without reform, millions of Americans could face higher healthcare costs.

The coming weeks will test whether the same spirit of compromise that ended the shutdown can extend into policy-making on healthcare and fiscal planning.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Parliament Winter Session 2025

Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju announced that the Winter Session of Parliament will take place from December 1 to 19, 2025. The announcement, made via X (formerly Twitter), invited all parties to engage in meaningful discussions aimed at “strengthening democracy and serving the aspirations of the people.”

Traditionally, the Winter Session begins in the third week of November and continues until just before Christmas. However, this year’s schedule—spanning just 19 days—has triggered criticism from opposition parties, who view the delay as an attempt to limit parliamentary scrutiny and debate.

Opposition’s Response: “An Unusually Delayed and Truncated Session”

The announcement immediately drew sharp reactions from opposition leaders. Congress General Secretary Jairam Ramesh labelled the move as “unusually delayed” and “truncated,” questioning the government’s intent.
“What message is being sent to the nation?” he wrote on X. “Clearly, the government has no business to transact, no bills to get passed, and no debate to be allowed.”

Echoing similar sentiments, Trinamool Congress MP Derek O’Brien accused the government of suffering from what he termed “Parliament-ophobia.” He remarked, “PM Narendra Modi and his team continue to suffer from an acute fear of facing Parliament. This short session sets a dubious record.”

Context: A Year of Limited Parliamentary Business

The criticism stems from a broader pattern noted throughout 2025. The Monsoon Session, which ended on August 21, witnessed limited legislative activity amid frequent disruptions and protests.
While 12 bills were passed in the Lok Sabha and 14 in the Rajya Sabha, much of the session was overshadowed by debates on Operation Sindoor and the Special Intensive Revision exercise in Bihar, both of which led to repeated adjournments.

Observers suggest that the Winter Session, being significantly shorter, may not allow adequate time to discuss pressing national issues or pending legislation.

Historical Comparison: Last Year’s Heated Winter Session

Last year’s Winter Session (2024) had been longer and far more eventful. It featured debates marking the 75th anniversary of the Constitution, a no-confidence motion against then Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar, and an Opposition-led impeachment notice against an Allahabad High Court judge.
The session concluded with a charged debate over the alleged insult of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, reflecting the politically charged atmosphere that often defines India’s parliamentary proceedings.

Government’s Stance: Focus on “Constructive Debate”

Despite the criticism, Minister Rijiju expressed optimism about the upcoming session. His statement emphasized collaboration and purpose: “We look forward to a constructive and meaningful session that strengthens democracy and serves the aspirations of the people.”
Government insiders suggest that the session will prioritize key economic and administrative bills while reviewing progress made under various national schemes before the fiscal year’s end.

What Lies Ahead

With the session scheduled to begin in early December, all eyes will be on how both Houses navigate political tensions and time constraints. Whether the short session will produce substantial legislative outcomes or dissolve into partisan gridlock remains to be seen.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Parliament Monsoon Session

The Indian government has tabled the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025, in the Parliament with a bold vision—to make India the global capital of game development. The legislation seeks to regulate the booming digital gaming industry, encourage innovation in e-sports and creative gaming, and curb the risks associated with money-based online gambling.

A National Online Gaming Authority in the Works

At the heart of the bill is the proposal for a national-level Online Gaming Authority. This regulatory body will oversee digital gaming platforms across the country, ensuring that safe, skill-based games are nurtured while harmful gambling-like platforms face strict scrutiny.

By providing a framework for classification and compliance, the authority aims to bring consistency to a sector that has long been fragmented by varying state laws.

Differentiating Safe Games From Gambling Platforms

A major highlight of the bill is its attempt to draw a clear line between skill-based e-sports and casual online games versus chance-driven money games.

The government has emphasized support for games rooted in skill, creativity, and competition—like e-sports and gamified social platforms. On the other hand, platforms offering poker, rummy, and other real-money card games are being targeted for stricter oversight, given their association with financial risks, fraud, and addiction.

Officials noted that while operators often blur the line between “skill” and “luck,” this bill seeks to remove ambiguity and protect both players and legitimate developers.

Addressing Addiction, Fraud, and Social Concerns

The government has underscored that the bill is not aimed at punishing players but rather at holding operators accountable. Concerns flagged by political leaders across parties highlight issues like:

  • Addiction and its impact on families.
  • Misleading platforms promising quick financial gains.
  • Fraudulent operators exploiting loopholes in state laws.

Recent investigations revealed that illegal betting apps—often disguised as skill-based games—are part of a market valued at over ₹8.3 lakh crore, growing at nearly 30% annually. The bill’s stricter oversight aims to tackle this rapidly expanding shadow sector.

Driving India’s Game Development Vision

Beyond regulation, the bill reflects the government’s larger ambition: to position India as a global hub for game development. With clarity in classification and active government support for safe gaming, the industry is expected to see greater investment in creative content, e-sports infrastructure, and gamified digital platforms.

As S Krishnan, Secretary of the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, put it, the goal is to encourage the positive, innovative side of gaming, while discouraging exploitative practices that harm users.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Our News Portal

We provide accurate, balanced, and impartial coverage of national and international affairs, focusing on the activities and developments within the parliament and its surrounding political landscape. We aim to foster informed public discourse and promote transparency in governance through our news articles, features, and opinion pieces.

Newsletter

Laest News

@2023 – All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by The Parliament News

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
-
00:00
00:00
Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00