Home World
Category:

World

japan

A 5.5 magnitude earthquake struck off the coast of the Tokara island chain in Kagoshima Prefecture, southwestern Japan, on Thursday, July 3, according to the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA). While no tsunami warning was issued, authorities urged residents in high-risk areas to evacuate as a precautionary measure.

Epicentre and Intensity:
The earthquake’s epicentre was located off the coast near Akuseki Island, nearly 1,200 kilometers from Tokyo. The JMA reported a seismic intensity of ‘6 lower’ on Japan’s 1-7 intensity scale at Akuseki Island — a level strong enough to potentially cause structural damage and trigger landslides in mountainous regions.

“In areas where the tremors were strong, there is an increased risk of collapsed houses and landslides,” warned Ayataka Ebita, Director of the Earthquake and Tsunami Observation Division at the JMA.

Evacuation and Risk Assessment:
Following the tremor, authorities issued evacuation advisories to the 89 residents of Akuseki Island. Although Japan is equipped with one of the world’s most sophisticated earthquake detection systems, the density of recent seismic activity has raised alarms. In September 2023, the Tokara region experienced a surge of 346 quakes in a short span — a sign of potential geological unrest in the area.

Seismic History and Public Anxiety:
The region is no stranger to tectonic disturbances, with over 1,000 earthquakes recorded recently along the Tokara chain. In parallel, anxiety over a so-called “megaquake” — a term popularised by a fictional comic book — has contributed to public unease. The viral narrative has even led to flight cancellations from Hong Kong, impacting Japan’s rebounding tourism sector.

Government Response:
Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba addressed the concerns, emphasizing the need for nationwide preparedness.

“It is necessary for the nation, municipalities, companies and non-profits to come together and take measures in order to save as many lives as possible,” he stated, highlighting the looming threat of a future catastrophic event, with potential casualties projected as high as 300,000.

Conclusion:
While the immediate threat from the July 3 earthquake appears contained, Japan’s seismic volatility remains a point of national concern. Authorities are calling for coordinated efforts to enhance infrastructure resilience and ensure the safety of communities in vulnerable zones.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
trump

Tensions between former allies Donald Trump and Elon Musk have taken a dramatic turn. Following the tech billionaire’s fierce criticism of Trump’s proposed “Big Beautiful Bill,” the former US president suggested he might consider deporting Musk — a naturalised citizen originally from South Africa. The unexpected threat underscores growing divisions over electric vehicle (EV) subsidies, national debt, and political loyalty.

The Trigger: Trump’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ vs. Musk’s EV Advocacy
Elon Musk has publicly slammed Trump’s flagship legislative proposal, the “Big Beautiful Bill,” for eliminating federal support for electric vehicles. Musk, CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, has not only criticised the bill’s economic impact but also warned that it would undermine the U.S. EV industry, inflate national debt, and restrict innovation.

“He’s losing his EV mandate,” Trump said in a sharp response, adding, “Elon can lose a lot more than that.”

Musk has gone so far as to threaten political retaliation, vowing to back electoral challenges against any lawmakers who support the bill. In a growing show of resistance, he has even floated the idea of founding a new political faction — the “America Party” — if the bill passes.

Trump’s Retort: Deportation and DOGE Threats
When asked by reporters whether Musk’s citizenship status could be reconsidered due to his vocal opposition, Trump replied cryptically:

“I don’t know. We’ll have to take a look.”

He then made a bizarre reference to turning the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a satirical agency Musk once led, against the billionaire:

“We might have to put DOGE on Elon… DOGE is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon.”

The comments appeared to be half-joking but were immediately picked up by media outlets and political commentators as a sign of escalating tensions.

Musk Responds: “So Tempting to Escalate”
Musk, who is known for his quick retorts on X (formerly Twitter), acknowledged Trump’s comments with restraint. Sharing a clip of the President’s remarks, he replied:

“So tempting to escalate this. So, so tempting. But I will refrain for now.”

Despite his measured tone, the post suggested Musk is weighing his next move carefully amid political pressure and media attention.

From Political Allies to Adversaries
Ironically, Musk was one of Trump’s largest donors in the 2024 election cycle and even served as a close adviser during the early days of the administration. He also led DOGE as a special government employee, tasked with cutting wasteful federal spending.

But as policy divides deepen, the rift between Trump and Musk appears to be widening into a full-scale public fallout.

What began as a policy disagreement over EV subsidies has morphed into a political power struggle between two of the most high-profile figures in American public life. Whether Trump’s deportation threat is serious or symbolic, it marks a significant fracture in a once-powerful alliance — and may shape the course of future debates around clean energy, national policy, and the political ambitions of Elon Musk.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
ukraine-russia

In what Ukrainian officials have called the “most massive air strike” since the start of the war, Russia launched 537 aerial weapons overnight—including 477 drones and 60 missiles—targeting key infrastructure and residential areas across Ukraine. The unprecedented aerial assault left six civilians injured and claimed the life of a heroic F-16 pilot who downed seven enemy targets before crashing.

Aerial Barrage Unleashed
According to Ukraine’s air force, 249 enemy weapons were intercepted, and 226 were lost likely due to electronic jamming. However, the scale of the attack—utilising roughly 500 different types of aerial weapons including Iranian-made Shahed drones, ballistic, cruise, and glide missiles—was unparalleled.

“The Russians were targeting everything that sustains life,” said President Volodymyr Zelensky on X.

Heroic F-16 Pilot Dies in Action
Ukraine confirmed the tragic death of pilot Maksym Ustymenko, who destroyed seven aerial threats before his F-16 was hit and lost altitude. He was unable to eject in time.

“Today, he destroyed 7 aerial targets. My condolences to his family and brothers-in-arms,” Zelensky said, ordering a full investigation into the crash.

This marks the third F-16 loss for Ukraine since the war began.

Widespread Damage Across Regions
The assault impacted cities far from the frontline. In Cherkasy, six civilians, including a child, were wounded. In Kherson, one civilian died. Industrial facilities were targeted in Mykolaiv and Dnipropetrovsk. In Lviv, a fire broke out in Drohobych, damaging power infrastructure and residential buildings.

Three multi-storey buildings, a college, and critical infrastructure were damaged across multiple regions, including Smila, where a child was among the injured.

Poland Scrambles Jets, Regional Fallout
Poland’s air force scrambled aircraft to secure national airspace amid the chaos, indicating the potential for wider regional consequences.

Ukraine’s Call for Enhanced Defence
President Zelensky reiterated the urgent need for enhanced air defences, especially American systems.

“This war must be brought to an end — pressure on the aggressor is needed, and so is protection,” he emphasized.

He revealed that in just the past week, Russia had launched over 114 missiles, 1,270 drones, and nearly 1,100 glide bombs.

Russia’s largest aerial assault yet underscores the escalating intensity of the three-year war, as Ukraine continues to defend itself with dwindling resources. With increasing pressure on Western allies for stronger support, Zelensky’s plea for advanced air defence systems reflects the dire urgency of the moment.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

A dramatic escalation in Middle East tensions unfolded as the United States conducted airstrikes on three suspected Iranian nuclear sites, prompting a fierce retaliation from Iran. Within hours, Tehran launched at least 40 missiles targeting Israel — including its most powerful Khorramshahr-4 missile — marking one of the most significant flare-ups in the ongoing conflict.

US Airstrikes Target Iranian Nuclear Facilities
According to reports, US bomber jets struck three high-value Iranian sites believed to be linked to Tehran’s nuclear ambitions. Though details remain classified, the targets are understood to include facilities central to uranium enrichment and nuclear weapons development. The strikes signaled a major shift in Washington’s posture, following weeks of deliberation over potential intervention.

Iran Responds with Khorramshahr-4 Missile Attack
The Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) confirmed the launch of over 40 missiles in retaliation, including the Khorramshahr-4 — Iran’s most formidable missile with a 2,000-km range and a 1,500-kg payload capacity. Iranian state TV broadcasted footage of the missile, claiming it had been deployed in today’s assault.

Also known as Kheibar, the missile is capable of carrying multiple warheads and is named after the city of Khorramshahr, a historic site from the Iraq-Iran War. Its alternate name references a fortress seized in the 7th century — further underscoring the symbolic dimensions of the strike.

Civilian Impact: Tel Aviv Under Attack
Missiles struck several civilian areas in northern Tel Aviv, including a shopping centre, a bank, and a salon. An NDTV journalist on ground reported shattered storefronts, broken gates, and glass strewn across the streets. Rescuers confirmed at least 11 injuries so far.

One local resident recounted how his first-floor home was destroyed in the blast. Fortunately, he was unharmed, having left for his mother’s home earlier.

Emergency Response in Full Swing
Israeli security and emergency agencies have sealed off affected zones and deployed earthmovers to clear debris. Several streets remain closed as responders manage the aftermath of the attack.

The back-to-back strikes by the US and Iran mark a dangerous new phase in an already volatile region. With powerful missiles and strategic assets now in play, the risk of a full-scale war has risen significantly — making international mediation and de-escalation efforts more urgent than ever.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

As the Israel-Iran conflict intensifies, US President Donald Trump has expressed skepticism over the feasibility of a ceasefire. While voicing support for peace talks, Trump admitted that Israel’s strikes on Iran would be “very hard to stop,” highlighting the complexities surrounding diplomatic intervention in an escalating regional conflict.

Trump: Ceasefire Difficult as Israel Gains Upper Hand
Speaking to reporters, Trump emphasized that the current momentum in Israel’s military operations makes it difficult to halt hostilities. “Israel’s doing well in terms of war. And I think, you would say that Iran is doing less well,” he said. “It’s a little bit hard to get somebody to stop.”

While acknowledging that ceasefire discussions are ongoing, Trump stressed that progress is complicated by the battlefield dynamics. “If somebody is winning, it’s a little bit harder to do than if somebody is losing,” he remarked.

US Position: Support for Talks, No Immediate Military Action
The White House recently stated that Trump sees a “substantial chance of negotiations” and has requested more time to assess whether US forces should directly intervene. “We’re ready, willing and able, and we’ve been speaking to Iran, and we’ll see what happens,” he added.

Trump’s comments indicate a cautious approach, balancing diplomatic engagement with strategic hesitation on military involvement.

Contradiction on Iran’s Nuclear Intentions
Addressing comments made earlier by US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard — who claimed Iran was not actively developing nuclear weapons — Trump firmly rejected the assertion. “She’s wrong,” he said, questioning the validity of US intelligence assessments.

His remarks came amid growing concern over Iran’s Fordo nuclear facility, a heavily fortified uranium enrichment site. Trump has delayed a decision on whether to strike the facility, citing the need for further analysis and clarity on Iran’s intentions.

Israel’s “Preemptive” Strikes on Iran
Israel launched strikes on Iran on June 13, calling them “preemptive” and aimed at halting Iran’s alleged nuclear weapons development. While Iran insists its nuclear program is for civilian purposes, doubts persist in both Israeli and US strategic circles.

Trump’s latest remarks reflect a volatile and unpredictable geopolitical situation, with military dynamics, intelligence disagreements, and diplomatic complexities all at play. While the US publicly supports a ceasefire, the on-ground reality — with Israel gaining momentum — makes peace a challenging proposition in the near term.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
yoga day

Marking the 10th anniversary of the International Day of Yoga, India is set to lead a massive global celebration on June 21, 2025. With the theme ‘Yoga for One Earth, One Health’, the country will organise over 2,000 events across 1,300 locations in 191 nations — reaffirming yoga’s global reach and India’s enduring cultural influence.

Global Participation: 2,000 Events, 191 Countries
According to the Indian Council for Cultural Relations (ICCR), more than 2,000 events will be held worldwide, covering 1,300 cities. The initiative reflects India’s strategic use of yoga as soft power diplomacy, uniting diverse nations through a common practice rooted in ancient Indian wisdom.

Notably, the Indian High Commission in Pakistan will host a yoga event in Islamabad, demonstrating India’s intent to foster peaceful cultural outreach despite political complexities.

Signature Event: Yoga Bandhan
A highlight of this year’s celebration is ‘Yoga Bandhan’, where 17 yoga gurus from 15 countries — including Brazil, Argentina, Russia, China, South Africa, Malaysia, Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Singapore, and South Korea — will lead sessions in India.

In Delhi, these international practitioners will conduct yoga at iconic landmarks like Jantar Mantar, Qutub Minar, Purana Quila, and Humayun’s Tomb. Similar programmes will take place in cities such as Lucknow, Varanasi, Jaipur, Bhopal, and Gwalior.

“Just as yoga is a union between Atma and Paramatma, ‘Yoga Bandhan’ seeks to unite India and the world,” said ICCR Director General K. Nandini Singla.

Theme: Yoga for One Earth, One Health
The 2025 theme — ‘Yoga for One Earth, One Health’ — aligns with India’s G20 presidency vision of “One Earth, One Family, One Future.” It underscores the link between individual health, collective wellbeing, and planetary sustainability.

Singla noted that preparations for this year’s Yoga Day began months in advance, with a 100-day awareness campaign. Countdown events were held at 100, 75, 50, and 25 days prior, across Indian embassies and consulates worldwide.

Yoga’s Rising Popularity Abroad
Yoga has gained traction among foreign dignitaries and civilians alike. From MPs and police officers to judges and legislators, a growing number of people abroad are incorporating yoga into their daily routines to manage stress and improve overall wellbeing.

“Our cultural centres abroad have become vibrant hubs of yoga,” said Singla. “Yoga has truly become a global movement.”

With widespread participation and a deeply resonant theme, International Day of Yoga 2025 is set to strengthen India’s global cultural footprint. As yoga continues to cross borders and unite people, this year’s celebration underscores its enduring relevance as a tool for harmony, health, and humanity.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
trump

In a statement stirring global attention, former US President Donald Trump has kept the world guessing about a potential military response against Iran. Speaking amidst escalating Middle East tensions, Trump stated, “I may do it, I may not do it,” regarding the possibility of joining Israeli strikes on Iran — a declaration loaded with ambiguity and geopolitical weight.

Trump’s Statement Adds to Global Uncertainty
Addressing reporters from the South Lawn of the White House, Trump emphasized that no one could predict his next move. “Nobody knows what I’m going to do,” he said, underscoring his characteristic unpredictability in foreign policy decisions. He further remarked, “Iran has gotten into a lot of trouble,” reflecting Washington’s long-standing concerns about Tehran’s actions in the region.

Khamenei Responds: Iran “Will Never Surrender”
Trump’s comments followed a fiery proclamation from Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. In a strongly worded warning, Khamenei declared that Iran “will never surrender” to external pressure and cautioned that any US intervention could result in “irreparable damage.”
This exchange of stark rhetoric highlights the rising diplomatic and military strain between Washington, Tel Aviv, and Tehran, as observers watch for further developments with growing unease.

The Strategic Implications
Trump’s deliberately vague stance on intervention places significant pressure on both allies and adversaries. It signals a willingness to escalate but without revealing clear intent — a move that keeps military and diplomatic actors off-balance. For Israel, a potential US partnership in strikes could significantly alter the calculus in its standoff with Iran. For Tehran, the uncertainty adds further strain to an already volatile situation.

Trump’s cryptic remarks have once again brought the US-Iran-Israel triangle into sharp global focus. As the region teeters on the edge of further conflict, all eyes remain on Washington’s next move and Tehran’s response.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Iran-Israel

Amid escalating Iran-Israel tensions and growing concerns over a new nuclear arms race, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) has raised alarm about the state of the world’s nuclear arsenal. The SIPRI Yearbook 2025 reveals that nine nuclear-armed states collectively possess 12,241 warheads — a dramatic indicator of the ongoing expansion and modernisation of nuclear capabilities.

Nuclear-Armed States and Warheads
According to SIPRI, nine countries currently possess nuclear warheads. Here’s a breakdown of their inventories:

  • United States: 5,177
  • Russia: 5,459
  • China: 600
  • France: 290
  • United Kingdom: 225
  • India: 180
  • Pakistan: 170
  • Israel: 90
  • North Korea: 50

SIPRI highlights that these states “continued intensive nuclear modernisation programmes in 2024, upgrading existing weapons and adding newer versions.”

Nuclear Deployment and Storage
Of the total 12,241 warheads in the world, 9,614 are in military stockpiles and are potentially available for use.
About 3,912 warheads were deployed with aircraft and ballistic missiles at the start of 2025, while nearly 2,100 were kept at a state of high operational alert — predominantly by the USA and Russia.
SIPRI notes that “China may now keep some warheads on missiles during peacetime.”

A Rising Concern Amid Conflict
The new data comes at a time when Iran’s nuclear programme and the ongoing Iran-Israel tensions have raised alarm about a potential escalation in nuclear proliferation.
Leaders from the USA and Israel have insisted Iran must not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons, adding urgency to diplomatic and strategic conversations.

As nine nuclear powers collectively hold over 12,000 warheads — many of them ready for deployment — the SIPRI Yearbook underscores a growing vulnerability in the international security environment. The ongoing Iran-Israel tensions and the weakening of arms control regimes serve as a dramatic backdrop to this growing nuclear competition.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
UN ocean Conference

Nice, France – 12 June 2025 | In a powerful and forward-thinking address at the 2025 United Nations Ocean Conference (UNOC3), Prof. Ganesh Prakash Channa, President of the World Environment Council (WEC), India, called for a globally coordinated, community-driven approach to establishing Marine Protected Areas (MPAs). Speaking under the theme of Ocean Action Panel 8: Promoting and supporting all forms of cooperation, Prof. Channa emphasized the urgent need for regional and subregional collaboration to safeguard marine biodiversity.

Prof. Channa’s intervention proposed a comprehensive global network of MPAs that includes deep-sea ecosystems, coral reefs, and migratory corridors, governed through strict enforcement protocols and inclusive local partnerships. He stressed that MPAs must go beyond symbolic declarations and be equipped with real-time monitoring, AI-enabled surveillance, and equitable funding.

“Local communities must be more than stakeholders—they must be co-managers,” said Prof. Channa, urging the UN and governments to support co-designed MPA strategies that align with both conservation and sustainable use.

He also called for the establishment of a UN-backed Global MPA Fund, with special focus on vulnerable island states and coastal communities, ensuring that equity remains central to global marine governance.

The address was met with wide acknowledgment from international delegates, further positioning India’s role in shaping inclusive ocean policy. Prof. Channa concluded by stating, “Let us not just preserve what remains—let us restore what has been lost and revive what still can be saved.”

The World Environment Council continues to lead ocean and climate education, youth-driven marine initiatives, and sustainability certifications globally.

0 comment
1 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
ukrine-russia

Kyiv, June 6, 2025 — Following one of the most intense aerial assaults in recent months, Ukraine has urgently appealed to the international community to intensify pressure on Russia. The overnight barrage of over 400 drones and more than 40 missiles caused severe civilian casualties and infrastructure damage, prompting renewed calls from Ukrainian leaders for decisive global intervention.

President Zelenskyy: “Delay Equals Complicity”

In a strongly worded statement, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy condemned the attack and warned that inaction from the international community would make others complicit in the ongoing violence.

“If someone does not put pressure and gives the war more time to take lives, they are complicit and responsible. We need to act decisively,” Mr. Zelenskyy wrote on social media.

The President’s remarks came hours after Russian forces launched a night-long aerial assault, targeting several Ukrainian cities. The deadly offensive marked a dramatic escalation in hostilities.

Foreign Minister Sybiga: “Pressure Must Increase Immediately”

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiga also released a statement demanding a swift and united response from Ukraine’s international allies.

“Russia’s overnight attack on civilians once again demonstrates that the international pressure on Moscow must be increased as soon as possible,” said Mr. Sybiga.

He emphasized the strategic use of drone and missile warfare by Russia as a continued violation of international norms and an affront to civilian safety.

A Call for Global Solidarity

Ukraine’s leadership has made it clear that time is of the essence. Delayed diplomatic or military responses, they argue, provide Russia with the latitude to escalate further attacks. Kyiv is pushing for:

  • Stronger sanctions against Russian energy and defense sectors
  • Accelerated military aid, including advanced air defense systems
  • Formal condemnations in international forums such as the UN and G7
  • Legal accountability for war crimes under international law

Implications for Regional and Global Security

The intensifying conflict continues to have broader geopolitical implications. Beyond the humanitarian crisis, the use of drone and missile strikes raises concerns over regional instability in Eastern Europe and risks to global energy and grain supply chains.

Analysts suggest that a delay in coordinated international response could embolden further aggression, not just from Russia, but from other authoritarian regimes observing the global reaction.

As Ukraine reels from its latest trauma, its message to the world is unequivocal: Decisive action is not just a choice—it is a responsibility. Delay, Kyiv warns, equates to complicity. With the international community already on alert, the coming days will likely test the resolve of Ukraine’s allies and the future trajectory of the war.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Our News Portal

We provide accurate, balanced, and impartial coverage of national and international affairs, focusing on the activities and developments within the parliament and its surrounding political landscape. We aim to foster informed public discourse and promote transparency in governance through our news articles, features, and opinion pieces.

Newsletter

Laest News

@2023 – All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by The Parliament News

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
-
00:00
00:00
Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00