Home Tags Posts tagged with "Lok Sabha"
Tag:

Lok Sabha

Delhi Tightens Security Ahead of Monsoon Session and ‘Chalo Sansad’ March

Security arrangements have been significantly strengthened across the New Delhi district ahead of the Monsoon Session of Parliament, scheduled to begin on July 20, and the proposed “Chalo Sansad” march. According to police sources, the Delhi Police has deployed additional personnel, reinforced barricading, intensified surveillance, and increased vehicle checks at key entry points to keep law and order during the parliamentary session.

Officials said the preventive security deployment will remain in place throughout the Monsoon Session, which is scheduled to continue until August 13.

Enhanced Security Measures

Several entry points into the New Delhi district have been designated as high‑security zones with multi‑layered security arrangements. These measures include:

  • Multi‑layered barricading at strategic locations
  • Intensive vehicle checking at entry points
  • Enhanced CCTV surveillance
  • Anti‑sabotage inspections
  • Round‑the‑clock patrolling
  • Additional police pickets
  • Reserve security forces on standby
  • Deployment of rapid response teams

According to a senior police source, every vehicle entering the New Delhi district is undergoing thorough security screening as part of the preventive arrangements.

The official said additional security personnel have been deployed at key locations while surveillance has been increased in areas considered sensitive during the parliamentary session.

High‑Security Locations

Security has been reinforced around several important locations in the national capital, including:

  • Parliament Street
  • Central Vista
  • Jantar Mantar
  • Connaught Place
  • Shankar Chowk
  • Other key government installations in New Delhi

Authorities have also intensified monitoring across parts of Central Delhi and North Delhi to ensure public safety during the session.

Protest and Hunger Strike

The heightened security comes amid developments related to the proposed “Chalo Sansad” march organised by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP).

According to reports, CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke continued his indefinite hunger strike after activist Sonam Wangchuk was taken to Safdarjung Hospital on July 18.

From the hospital, Wangchuk reportedly appealed to supporters to participate in the planned march to Parliament on July 20.

Focus on Law and Order

Police officials have stated that the enhanced deployment is aimed at ensuring security during the parliamentary session and facilitating effective law enforcement in the national capital.

Authorities are expected to continue monitoring developments closely as Parliament convenes and public demonstrations are scheduled to take place in the city.

Key Points at a Glance

  • Monsoon Session: July 20 – August 13, 2026
  • Security Measures: Additional police deployment, vehicle checks, CCTV surveillance, barricading, anti‑sabotage inspections
  • High‑Security Areas: Parliament Street, Central Vista, Jantar Mantar, Connaught Place, Shankar Chowk
  • Proposed Event: “Chalo Sansad” march on July 20
  • Current Situation: Preventive security deployment to remain throughout the Parliament session

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Lok Sabha

Both Houses of Parliament were adjourned on Thursday, with the ongoing Budget Session set to reconvene on April 16 after a scheduled recess.

Key Legislation Passed in Lok Sabha

The Lok Sabha passed the Central Armed Police Forces (General Administration) Bill, 2026, by voice vote. The legislation had earlier been approved by the Rajya Sabha.

The Bill outlines provisions related to deputation in senior ranks within Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs). It mandates that 50% of posts at the rank of Inspector General be filled through deputation, while at least 67% of Additional Director General posts are to be filled in a similar manner. Positions at the ranks of Special Director General and Director General are to be filled entirely through deputation.

Rajya Sabha Clears Jan Vishwas Amendment Bill

The Rajya Sabha passed the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Bill by voice vote. The legislation proposes wide-ranging changes across multiple laws.

It aims to amend 784 provisions across 79 Central Acts administered by 23 ministries. Of these, 717 provisions are set to be decriminalised, while 67 provisions are to be modified, with the objective of improving regulatory compliance and facilitating ease of living.

Amaravati Recognised as Andhra Pradesh Capital

Parliament also passed a Bill recognising Amaravati as the sole and permanent capital of Andhra Pradesh. The Rajya Sabha approved the legislation by voice vote, with support from most political parties, while the YSR Congress Party opposed the measure.

Session to Reconvene for Constitutional Amendments

Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju confirmed that the Budget Session would not be adjourned sine die but placed in recess.

He stated that Parliament would reconvene for a specific period to consider amendments related to the Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, commonly referred to as the Women’s Reservation Act, 2023.

Legislative Activity Continues

The session saw the passage of several key bills across both Houses, reflecting ongoing legislative activity on administrative reforms, governance frameworks, and policy implementation.

The reconvening of Parliament later in April is expected to focus on constitutional and legislative priorities currently under consideration.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Finance Bill 2026 Passed in Lok Sabha

New Delhi: The Lok Sabha passed the Finance Bill, 2026, marking a key legislative step required to implement proposals outlined in the Union Budget for 2026–27.

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman addressed the House during the discussion on the Bill, which was later approved through a voice vote. The legislation provides legal backing for changes in income tax rates, as well as revisions in customs and excise duties.

Opposition Raises Concerns

Several Opposition members opposed the introduction of the Bill, raising concerns over specific provisions. Among those who spoke against it were Manish Tewari, Sougata Ray, and T Sumathy.

They argued that certain provisions in the proposed legislation could weaken aspects of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) regulations. The government, however, proceeded with the passage of the Bill.

Protest Over LPG Supply Concerns

Outside Parliament, Opposition leaders staged a protest within the Parliament House complex over concerns related to a reported LPG supply crunch linked to the ongoing conflict in West Asia.

Leaders including Mallikarjun Kharge, Supriya Sule, Dharmendra Yadav, Sudama Prasad, T Sumathy, and Mahua Maji were among those present near the Makar Dwar during the demonstration.

All-Party Meeting on West Asia Crisis

Amid rising concerns over the geopolitical situation in West Asia, Union Home Minister Amit Shah is scheduled to chair an all-party meeting later in the day.

The meeting aims to brief political leaders on the evolving situation and its potential economic and security implications for India. The initiative follows remarks by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in both Houses of Parliament, where he described the situation as an unprecedented crisis with possible long-term effects.

The government’s outreach to political parties comes as global developments continue to influence energy markets and domestic supply concerns.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Lok Sabha Passes Appropriation Bill 2026

The Lok Sabha passed the Appropriation Bill 2026 following several adjournments triggered by protests from Opposition members. The Bill authorises the government to withdraw additional funds from the Consolidated Fund of India to meet expenditure for the financial year 2025–26.

The passage of the Bill came after the House approved the Supplementary Demands for Grants through a voice vote. These demands allow the government to seek additional financial allocations beyond the budget estimates for the ongoing financial year.

During the discussion, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman announced the creation of an Economic Stabilisation Fund worth ₹1 lakh crore. The fund is intended to provide fiscal flexibility and enable the government to respond to global economic challenges that may affect the Indian economy.

According to the Finance Minister, the proposed fund will create fiscal space that can be used if global developments place pressure on economic stability. The initiative is aimed at strengthening the government’s capacity to manage economic risks arising from international developments.

Meanwhile, members of the Opposition coalition submitted a notice in both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha seeking the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. The notice marks the first time such a proposal has been submitted in Parliament against a sitting Chief Election Commissioner.

The notice was signed by 130 Members of Parliament from the Lok Sabha and 63 members from the Rajya Sabha. It lists several allegations related to the conduct of the Chief Election Commissioner during his tenure.

The charges mentioned in the notice include claims of partisan conduct, discriminatory actions in office, obstruction of investigations related to electoral irregularities, and allegations of disenfranchisement of voters. The proposal seeks parliamentary consideration of these claims under the constitutional process governing the removal of an Election Commissioner.

Separately, the Lok Sabha also witnessed a heated exchange during the discussion on the supplementary demands for grants. Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi raised allegations concerning Union Minister Hardeep Singh Puri during his speech in the House.

The remarks led to a confrontation between Mr. Gandhi and Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, resulting in disruptions during the proceedings. The exchange contributed to repeated interruptions in the House before legislative business resumed.

Despite the disruptions, the government was able to complete the passage of the Appropriation Bill, allowing the authorised funds to be withdrawn for government expenditure for the financial year 2025–26.

The developments reflect continuing political disagreements between the government and Opposition parties during the current parliamentary session, with debates focusing on financial legislation as well as institutional issues raised by Opposition members.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Industrial Relations Code (Amendment) Bill, 2026

New Delhi, February 12, 2026: The Lok Sabha on Thursday passed the Industrial Relations Code (Amendment) Bill, 2026, aimed at ensuring legal clarity regarding the repeal of certain labour laws replaced by the Industrial Relations Code, 2020.

The amendment introduces savings provisions to avoid what the government described as any “future unwarranted complication” over the continuity of laws subsumed under the 2020 Code.

The Industrial Relations Code, 2020 consolidated and replaced three major labour legislations: the Trade Unions Act, 1926; the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; and the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. These laws governed trade unions, industrial employment conditions, and industrial dispute resolution.

Clarifying the Repeal Provision

According to the statement of objects and reasons of the amendment Bill, Section 104 of the Industrial Relations Code already provides for the repeal of the earlier enactments. However, the government said there was a possibility of confusion arising from a “misconceived ground” that the Code delegated the power to repeal those laws to the executive.

The statement clarified that the repeal had occurred by operation of Section 104 itself, and that a notification issued in February 2026 reaffirmed this position. The amendment, it said, is intended to prevent any future legal uncertainty.

“It is considered desirable to introduce the proposed amendment to avoid any future unwarranted complication,” the statement said.

Savings provisions are typically included in legislation to preserve actions, rights, obligations, and proceedings initiated under repealed laws, thereby ensuring continuity and legal certainty.

Government’s Position

Replying to the discussion before the passage of the Bill, Labour Minister Mansukh Mandaviya said the four Labour Codes implemented nearly three months ago ensure key protections for workers.

He stated that the Codes guarantee minimum wages, mandate the issuance of appointment letters, and provide for uniform wages for the same work irrespective of gender.

The four Labour Codes covering wages, industrial relations, social security, and occupational safety were enacted to consolidate multiple central labour laws into a simplified framework. The government has maintained that the reform improves compliance and strengthens worker protections while promoting ease of doing business.

Opposition Criticism

During the debate, members of the Opposition criticised the government’s approach to labour reforms.

Congress MP K. Suresh said that instead of dialogue, the government “has chosen to dominate labourers.” He referred to a strike call given by workers on Thursday, describing it as a “warning signal” and reflecting what he termed policy shortcomings in addressing labour concerns.

Mr. Suresh also contrasted the current government’s approach with that of the previous United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, citing the introduction of schemes such as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) and the National Food Security Act as examples of pro-labour policies.

The debate highlighted differing political perspectives on labour reforms and their implementation. While the government emphasised legal clarity and structural reform, Opposition members raised concerns about consultation and worker safeguards.

With the Lok Sabha’s approval, the amendment Bill moves forward in the legislative process.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Amid continued disruptions in the Budget Session, Opposition parties led by the Congress on Tuesday submitted a no-confidence motion seeking the removal of Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla.

The notice was submitted during repeated adjournments and ruckus in the Lower House, which was adjourned till 2.00 p.m. on Tuesday (February 10, 2026). Chief Whip of the Congress in the Lok Sabha Kodikunnil Suresh and party Whip Mohammed Jawed Ahmed handed over the notice to Lok Sabha Secretary-General Utpal Kumar Singh, sources said.

Constitutional provision and submission

According to Article 94(c) of the Constitution, a Lok Sabha member may give written notice of intention to move a resolution for the removal of the Speaker to the Secretary-General, with a minimum notice period of 14 days.

Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi said the motion was submitted at 1:14 p.m. on Tuesday. He stated that the primary concern of the Opposition was that the Leader of Opposition had not been allowed to speak on several occasions. He added that many Opposition parties shared this concern.

“At 1:14 p.m. today we submitted a motion expressing no-confidence and asking for removal of Speaker Om Birla as per Rule 94(c),” Mr. Gogoi said in a statement.

Signatories and parties involved

The notice seeking the removal of Mr. Birla bears 119 signatures. Among the signatories are DMK MP T.R. Baalu and Samajwadi Party MP Dimple Yadav. Members of the Trinamool Congress did not sign the notice.

Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi has also not signed the motion, as one of the charges in the notice relates to him allegedly not being allowed to speak in the House.

Opposition parties that have signed the notice include the Congress, RJD, Samajwadi Party, DMK, and Left parties.

Allegations against the Speaker

The Congress has accused the Speaker of acting in a partisan manner and denying Rahul Gandhi the opportunity to speak during the debate on the Motion of Thanks to the President’s address.

The notice also refers to the recent suspension of eight Opposition MPs by the Speaker for what was described as unruly behaviour, seven of whom belong to the Congress.

Additionally, the notice alleges differential treatment by the Chair, stating that a BJP member was allowed to make personalised attacks on two former Prime Ministers, while no action was taken despite objections raised by the Opposition.

The motion further objects to remarks made by the Speaker in the House that he had “concrete information” suggesting that several Congress MPs might move towards Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s seat and carry out an “unexpected act.” The notice described this statement as an abuse of the constitutional office of the Speaker.

Separate letter by women MPs

Separately, eight women Members of Parliament from the Congress wrote to the Speaker on Monday (February 9), alleging that they were being targeted because they had “consistently fought against PM Modi’s anti-people government and demanded accountability from him.”

The no-confidence motion marks a significant escalation in the ongoing confrontation between the Opposition and the government during the Budget Session.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Parliament Budget Session

The Budget Session of Parliament on Friday was marked by repeated disruptions and political confrontation, resulting in frequent adjournments in both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha. Opposition protests prevented the scheduled business from being carried out, and both Houses were eventually adjourned for the day. Proceedings are set to resume on Monday at 11 am.

In the Lok Sabha, a general discussion on the Union Budget 2026–27 was initiated. However, continuous sloganeering by Opposition members disrupted the debate, preventing detailed discussion on budgetary proposals. Due to the sustained disruptions, most of the listed agenda items could not be taken up.

The Rajya Sabha also witnessed interruptions during the day. Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed the Upper House, where he defended the government’s economic and foreign policy approach. Referring to India’s growing engagement with the United States and the European Union, the Prime Minister described these agreements as significant for global economic stability.

The Prime Minister’s remarks drew sharp reactions from Opposition parties, leading to further protests. Several suspended Members of Parliament staged demonstrations both inside and outside the Parliament complex, alleging that the government had entered into unfavourable international trade arrangements. Some Opposition leaders described these arrangements as a “US–India trap deal”.

Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge criticised the Prime Minister’s address, alleging that the government was repeating misleading claims and avoiding accountability on key national issues.

The repeated disruptions throughout the day resulted in a substantial loss of parliamentary time. Political confrontation dominated proceedings, overshadowing substantive discussion on the Union Budget.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Lok Sabha

Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla on Thursday said he had advised Prime Minister Narendra Modi not to come to the House on Wednesday, February 4, 2026, after receiving what he described as “definite information” that Opposition members were preparing to protest in an “unprecedented manner”.

Addressing the House before adjourning proceedings for the day, Mr. Birla said the behaviour witnessed in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday was unlike anything seen earlier. “With sadness I have to inform that some members displayed such behaviour in the House that had never been witnessed in its history,” the Speaker said.

The Prime Minister was scheduled to reply to the discussion on the Motion of Thanks to the President’s address at around 5 p.m. on Wednesday. However, the House was adjourned after women MPs from Opposition parties crossed the aisle and held banners in front of the Prime Minister’s designated seat.

The protests were linked to allegations made by BJP MP Nishikant Dubey against former Congress Prime Ministers. Following the disruption, the Motion of Thanks was passed by the House on Thursday, February 5, 2026, without the customary reply from the Prime Minister.

The Congress later indicated that it would allow the Prime Minister to speak only if Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi was also permitted to address the House.

Mr. Birla also reprimanded Opposition members for their conduct in his chamber after the House was adjourned until 5 p.m. on Wednesday. Congress MPs had met the Speaker to question the Chair’s decision to allow Mr. Dubey’s remarks and demanded action against him.

By late evening, the Speaker’s office expunged several objectionable remarks from the official records of the House.

The developments reflect continuing tensions between the government and the Opposition during the ongoing parliamentary session, with repeated disruptions affecting legislative business.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Parliament Bugdet Session

The proceedings of the Lok Sabha were adjourned for the day on Tuesday following the suspension of eight Opposition Members of Parliament amid continued uproar in the House.

According to reports, the disruption occurred after papers were allegedly thrown towards the Chair during the proceedings. In response, Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju moved a resolution seeking the suspension of certain Opposition MPs for alleged unruly behaviour. The resolution was passed by a voice vote.

Speaker in the Chair Dilip Saikia subsequently announced the suspension of the members for the remainder of the current session.

The MPs suspended include Hibi Eden, Amarinder Singh Raja Warring, Manickam Tagore, Gurjeet Singh Aujla, Kiran Kumar Reddy, Prashant Yadaorao Padole, S Venkatesan, and Dean Kuriakose, as reported by news agency ANI.

Following the announcement, the House continued to witness disruptions, leading to the adjournment of proceedings for the day.

After his suspension, Congress MP Prashant Yadaorao Padole told ANI that the Opposition was attempting to raise issues in the House and alleged that their voices were being suppressed. He stated that the suspension followed protests by Opposition members against what they described as attempts to silence them.

The suspension of MPs for disorderly conduct is permitted under parliamentary rules when members are found to be obstructing proceedings. Such actions, however, often draw sharp political reactions and have been a recurring point of contention between the government and the Opposition during parliamentary sessions.

The Lok Sabha is expected to resume proceedings as per the scheduled business on the next working day.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Parliament Winter Session 2025

Parliament’s Winter Session of 2025 concluded abruptly on December 19, with both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha adjourned sine die shortly after resuming for the day. The closing moments mirrored the overall tone of the session—intense, confrontational, and dominated by political disagreement, particularly over the newly passed Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) Bill, or VB-G RAM G Bill.

What was expected to be a routine final sitting instead unfolded as a continuation of the unrest that had marked the previous day. Protests by Opposition members, which had extended overnight within the Parliament complex, set the backdrop for a session that ended without further legislative business.

Protests Spill Over Into the Final Day

Opposition parties remained firm in their opposition to the VB-G RAM G Bill, which replaces the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), a programme that has been in place for nearly two decades. The Bill’s passage earlier triggered strong reactions, with Opposition leaders accusing the government of pushing through a major policy change without sufficient consultation or scrutiny.

By the final morning, tensions had not eased. Opposition members reiterated their objections and announced plans to carry their protest beyond Parliament, signalling nationwide demonstrations. They argued that the new law weakens rural employment protections and dismantles an existing social safety net.

Rajya Sabha Session Formally Concluded

In the Rajya Sabha, Vice-President and Chairman C. P. Radhakrishnan formally brought the 269th session to a close. In his concluding remarks, he described the session as productive overall, citing improved participation during Question Hour and Zero Hour.

At the same time, he expressed strong disapproval of the conduct witnessed during the previous day’s proceedings. Referring to scenes where members protested during a minister’s reply and tore documents, he said such actions were not in keeping with the dignity of the House. The Rajya Sabha adjourned sine die with the customary playing of Vande Mataram.

Lok Sabha Adjourned Amid Continuing Protests

Soon after, Speaker Om Birla adjourned the Lok Sabha sine die as protests continued within the House. Prime Minister Narendra Modi was present during the adjournment, which effectively ended the Winter Session on a tense and unresolved note.

The scenes in the Lok Sabha reflected the sharp divide between the government and the Opposition, with the VB-G RAM G Bill remaining the central point of contention even after its passage.

Productivity Figures Despite Disruptions

Despite the political turbulence, parliamentary authorities highlighted strong productivity during the session. The Rajya Sabha recorded productivity of 121 per cent, while the Lok Sabha achieved 111 per cent. Several government Bills were introduced and passed, indicating that legislative business continued at a steady pace for much of the session.

However, the final days underscored how political disagreements can overshadow legislative achievements, particularly when major policy shifts are involved.

Political Reactions Continue After Adjournment

Reactions to the VB-G RAM G Bill remained sharp even after Parliament adjourned. Opposition leaders described the legislation as detrimental to rural workers and accused the government of undermining employment security. Some warned that public resistance could intensify and suggested that sustained pressure might force a reconsideration of the law, drawing parallels with past policy reversals.

The government, meanwhile, has maintained that the new law represents a modernised approach to rural employment, aligned with long-term development goals. These opposing narratives are expected to dominate political discourse in the coming weeks.

An Attempt to Restore Dialogue

Following the adjournment, Speaker Om Birla met leaders of various political parties in his chamber. Such meetings are a customary post-session practice, aimed at easing tensions and reopening channels of dialogue after contentious sittings.

Whether this engagement will translate into consensus remains uncertain, as the debate over rural employment reform now moves beyond Parliament and into the public domain.

A Session That Sets the Tone Ahead

As Parliament rose, the Winter Session of 2025 came to be defined by a mix of high legislative output and deep political division. The passage of the VB-G RAM G Bill ensured that the session will be remembered not just for the number of laws passed, but for the intensity of the debate surrounding one of them.

With protests expected to continue outside the House, the issues raised during the session are likely to shape political discussions well beyond the winter recess.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts

Our News Portal

We provide accurate, balanced, and impartial coverage of national and international affairs, focusing on the activities and developments within the parliament and its surrounding political landscape. We aim to foster informed public discourse and promote transparency in governance through our news articles, features, and opinion pieces.

Newsletter

Laest News

@2023 – All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by The Parliament News

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
-
00:00
00:00
Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00