Home Tags Posts tagged with "parliament news"
Tag:

parliament news

Parliament Winter Session day 14

The Lok Sabha on December 18, 2025, passed the Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin), known as the VB-G RAM G Bill, bringing a significant change to India’s rural employment framework. The legislation seeks to replace the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in place for nearly two decades, with a new programme guaranteeing 125 days of employment each year.

The Bill was passed through a voice vote amid protests by Opposition members, who raised slogans and expressed objections during the proceedings. Despite the disruptions, the government maintained that the legislation represents a necessary update to align rural employment policy with current development priorities.

Government’s Rationale for Replacing MGNREGA

Responding to a lengthy debate that stretched over eight hours, Rural Development Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan defended the decision to replace MGNREGA. He argued that while the earlier scheme played an important role in providing income support, it had limitations that needed to be addressed.

According to the Minister, large public expenditures—estimated at ₹10–11 lakh crore over the years—had primarily gone toward wage payments. He stated that the new approach aims to balance employment generation with the creation of durable assets that contribute to long-term rural development. The emphasis, he said, should be on building “fully developed villages” rather than focusing only on short-term employment relief.

Focus Areas Under the New Programme

The VB-G RAM G Bill outlines a broader scope of work compared to its predecessor. The government has said the programme will prioritise projects related to water security, including the construction of lakes, water bodies, and micro-irrigation channels. These initiatives are intended to address chronic water shortages and improve agricultural resilience.

In addition, the scheme will support the development of core rural and livelihood infrastructure, such as access roads and facilities linked to local economic activity. Special provisions have also been included for works aimed at reducing the impact of extreme weather events, reflecting growing concerns around climate variability in rural areas.

All assets created under the programme will be digitally mapped and integrated into the proposed Viksit Bharat National Rural Infrastructure Stack. The government has described this as a way to improve transparency, planning, and coordination across rural development initiatives.

Opposition Objections and Demand for Scrutiny

At the start of the sitting, Congress MP K.C. Venugopal requested that the Bill be referred to a parliamentary committee for detailed examination. He argued that a policy shift of this scale required deeper scrutiny and wider consultation.

Speaker Om Birla declined the request, noting that 98 members from across party lines had already participated in the debate, which extended past midnight the previous day. He said the House had given sufficient time for discussion and that the legislative process had been followed.

As the debate progressed, Opposition members continued to protest, with some entering the well of the House and tearing copies of the Bill. The disruptions underscored the political sensitivity surrounding changes to a flagship rural employment programme.

Sharp Political Exchanges in the House

During his reply, Mr. Chouhan strongly criticised the Congress, accusing it of selectively invoking Mahatma Gandhi’s legacy while failing to uphold Gandhian values in practice. He said that refusing to engage with differing viewpoints also went against the principles associated with Gandhi.

The Minister argued that the current government’s welfare initiatives reflected those ideals more effectively. He cited schemes such as PM Awas Yojana, Ujjwala Yojana, Swachh Bharat Mission, and Ayushman Bharat as examples of policies aimed at improving dignity and quality of life for the poor.

He also pointed out that the rural employment scheme was initially launched as NREGA and that Mahatma Gandhi’s name was added later, ahead of the 2009 general elections. This, he suggested, was a political decision rather than a reflection of the programme’s core philosophy.

Linking the Bill to Long-Term Development Goals

Mr. Chouhan stated that the VB-G RAM G Bill should be viewed as part of a larger statutory framework aligned with the government’s vision of Viksit Bharat 2047. He maintained that the new programme is designed to modernise rural employment by integrating it with infrastructure development, climate adaptation, and digital governance.

The Minister also credited Prime Minister Narendra Modi with ensuring the effective implementation of MGNREGA during his tenure, countering Opposition claims that the new Bill undermines earlier welfare efforts. According to him, the proposed law builds on past experience while updating the structure to meet future needs.

What the Passage of the Bill Signals

The passage of the VB-G RAM G Bill marks a turning point in how rural employment is structured in India. Supporters see it as an attempt to move beyond wage support toward asset creation and village-level development. Critics, however, remain concerned about implementation, safeguards, and whether the new framework will provide the same level of employment security as MGNREGA.

With the Bill now cleared by the Lok Sabha, attention will shift to how the programme is rolled out on the ground and how effectively it balances employment generation with long-term rural infrastructure goals.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Parliament Winter Session 2025 Day 9

On the ninth day of the Winter Session, Parliament delivered yet another reminder of how layered, charged and unpredictable legislative days in India can be. Both Houses convened with packed agendas, shifting seamlessly between governance, ideology, cultural identity, and political confrontation before finally adjourning for the day.

Lok Sabha: Policy, Pollution and Pointed Exchanges

The Lok Sabha opened with Question Hour and quickly moved into dense legislative business. Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman introduced the Appropriation (No. 4) Bill, 2025—an essential step to authorise additional expenditure for the current financial year. This was followed by a key procedural development: the extension of the joint committee scrutinising the One Nation–One Election proposal until the Budget Session of 2026, signalling that the government intends to take its time shaping one of its most ambitious election reform ideas.

Beyond budgetary matters, the House wrestled with issues that hit much closer to the ground. Delhi’s worsening air pollution resurfaced as a major concern, with MPs demanding a comprehensive clean-air blueprint inspired by global models like Beijing’s aggressive anti-smog strategy. Environmental debates deepened further when several members objected to proposed oil and gas exploration in the fragile Gulf of Mannar ecosystem.

The session took an unexpected turn when BJP MP Anurag Thakur alleged that a Trinamool Congress MP had used a banned e-cigarette inside the chamber—prompting Speaker Om Birla to firmly remind the House that such conduct is not permissible. The accusation triggered murmurs, counterpoints and heated interventions across party benches.

Political temperatures rose further when Rahul Gandhi launched a sharp critique of Union Home Minister Amit Shah’s earlier remarks during the electoral reforms debate. Gandhi described Shah as “very nervous” and under pressure, adding yet another chapter to the ongoing tug-of-war between the opposition and the treasury benches.

Rajya Sabha: Vande Mataram, Electoral Reforms and Spirited Interruptions

The Rajya Sabha carried its own brand of spirited debates. The discussion on the 150th anniversary of Vande Mataram continued, a session that was expected to be ceremonial but instead evolved into a clash of political philosophies.

BJP president J.P. Nadda defended the government’s cultural position, accusing Congress of inconsistency and disregard for national symbols. Congress chief Mallikarjun Kharge promptly interrupted, arguing that the conversation had drifted from celebrating Vande Mataram to attacking historical figures like Jawaharlal Nehru. The exchange underscored how cultural topics in Parliament often become battlegrounds for broader political narratives.

Parallel to the cultural debate, the Upper House continued its engagement with electoral reforms. Several BJP speakers were lined up to present their arguments on proposed changes to the electoral framework, emphasising transparency and modernisation—an ongoing theme across both chambers this session.

A Day of Unfinished Arguments and Unresolved Questions

After hours of debate, disruptions and crossfire on issues ranging from national symbols to financial authorisations, both Houses were adjourned with plans to reconvene at 11 am on Friday. The day offered a vivid snapshot of India’s democratic machinery—messy, loud, ideological, but undeniably active.

With the Winter Session entering a critical phase, these debates are shaping narratives on governance, transparency, national identity and electoral change—setting the tone for the political months ahead.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Parliament Winter Session 2025 Day 7

The day in the Parliament began with the lower house locked in a furious, nearly 10-hour debate on Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. Government lawmakers defended the exercise as a constitutionally valid, technologically enhanced method to eliminate duplicate, migrated, and deceased voter entries and ensure cleaner, more accurate voter lists. On the other side, the Opposition painted it as a selective, partisan exercise that disproportionately impacts minority and opposition-leaning constituencies calling it “vote-chori” and questioning the neutrality of the Election Commission of India (EC). Demands for transparency, full roll-verification, and independent auditing echoed throughout the proceedings.

Meanwhile, in the upper house a ceremony meant to commemorate 150 years of Vande Mataram turned into a bitter debate about national identity and cultural symbolism. The ruling alliance insisted the song be institutionally honoured for its historical role uniting freedom fighters; the Opposition countered that patriotism cannot be enforced by legislation, accusing the treasury benches of playing identity politics and ignoring urgent social and economic issues.

Overlapping with these flashpoints, the nation’s aviation system battered by repeated cancellations and passenger chaos came under fire. The Civil Aviation Ministry faced tough questions over a recent spate of flight disruptions by IndiGo. In response, the minister announced that new Flight Duty Time Limitations (FDTL) for pilots are now in force to curb crew fatigue and improve safety. The House was told airlines, including IndiGo, would face strict DGCA oversight; regulators may penalize future lapses, and a parliamentary standing committee has asked to summon airline executives and DGCA officials next week to investigate the systemic breakdown.

On internal security, the Home Ministry laid bare recent gains in the fight against left-wing extremism, reporting that since 2019, 29 top Maoist leaders have been neutralised, over 7,300 cadres arrested, and roughly 5,571 militants surrendered. According to the government, the number of “severely affected” districts has shrunk thanks to increased security deployments, better inter-agency intel-sharing, and developmental outreach. MPs pressed for details on rehabilitation for surrendered cadres and sought fresh district-wise data.

Adding another layer, Parliament’s committees revealed economic and administrative developments: public-sector banks have written off more than ₹6.15 lakh crore in bad loans over recent years, prompting opposition demands for a full disclosure of beneficiaries and recovery breakdowns. The government announced plans to shut down 25 loss-making central PSUs under its restructuring drive triggering concerns about job security, asset valuation, and possible privatization. On the taxation front, simpler income-tax return forms are reportedly coming soon, aimed at easing compliance.

Last but perhaps most explosive: the opposition bloc formally signalled its intention to bring an impeachment motion against Justice G. R. Swaminathan of the Madras High Court, citing alleged misconduct. If they secure the necessary signatures, this could trigger a major constitutional confrontation between Parliament and the judiciary.

As the Winter Session (scheduled from December 1–19, 2025) enters its second week, what began as a planned session has evolved into one of the most turbulent, politically charged sittings in recent memory with every debate, symbolic gesture, and procedural move turned into a battleground of competing narratives about democracy, governance, identity, and institutional trust.

Why Today Matters: The Stakes Are Bigger Than Politics

  • The SIR debate is about more than updating voter lists, it strikes at the heart of electoral fairness and democracy, raising questions about who gets to vote and whose votes may be discarded.
  • The “Vande Mataram” controversy illustrates how cultural and symbolic politics can overshadow substantive issues like economy, jobs, public welfare.
  • The IndiGo crisis underscores systemic vulnerabilities in essential public services and highlights the challenge of regulating large private players under public interest.
  • Security updates on left-wing extremism point to government claims of success but the call for data and rehabilitation signals continuing skepticism.
  • Economic disclosures and PSU shutdowns reflect broader structural changes, but also spark anxiety over job security and transparency.
  • The potential impeachment of a High Court judge threatens a constitutional standoff raising fundamental questions about checks and balances, judicial independence, and parliamentary power.

In short: what unfolded today isn’t just politics as usual. It is a microcosm of India’s larger struggles — about identity and inclusion, about economic reform and fairness, about institutional integrity and trust — and a clear signal that the next few months in Parliament will shape more than just laws.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Parliament Winter Session 2025 Day 4

In a significant policy development, Parliament has officially passed the Central Excise (Amendment) Bill, 2025, after the Rajya Sabha approved and returned it to the Lok Sabha. The bill marks one of the most sweeping revisions to tobacco taxation in recent years, focusing not only on revenue but also on public health and long-standing concerns around affordability of harmful products.

Why the Amendment Was Needed

The amendment updates the Central Excise Act, 1944 to allow the government to raise duties on cigarettes, cigars, hookah tobacco, chewing tobacco, zarda, scented tobacco and tobacco substitutes.
One of the key motivations behind the bill is ensuring that taxation remains effective after the sunset of the previous cess structure. Without a revision, the government would lack fiscal room to maintain the overall tax burden necessary to discourage consumption.

Massive Revision of Tobacco Duty Structure

The updated duty slabs reflect a dramatic shift compared to the older system. Previously, the excise duty on cigarettes ranged from 200 to 735 rupees per thousand sticks. The new structure pushes this range to between 2,700 and 11,000 rupees per thousand cigarettes.
Other product categories also see steep increases:

  • Chewing tobacco duty rising from 25 percent to 100 percent
  • Hookah tobacco duty increasing from 25 percent to 40 percent
  • Pipe and cigarette smoking mixture duty jumping from 60 percent to 325 percent

The government’s stated objective is clear: tobacco should not remain an easily affordable product in the market, particularly when its health impact is well-documented.

Government’s Stand: Public Health First, Revenue Sharing Intact

Responding to concerns in the Rajya Sabha, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman clarified that the revised taxes will be shared with states, emphasizing that this is excise duty and not a new cess.
She also addressed apprehensions regarding farmers and beedi workers. According to the Minister, multiple schemes — especially those targeting crop diversification — are already in place to support farmers interested in shifting out of tobacco cultivation. Between 2017-18 and 2021-22, more than 1.12 lakh acres have been moved away from tobacco farming.

Additionally, nearly 50 lakh beedi workers are registered across the country, and several welfare programmes continue to operate through national labour organisations.

Aligning India With Global Standards

India’s current tax incidence on cigarettes stands at nearly 53 percent of the retail price, significantly lower than the World Health Organization’s recommended benchmark of 75 percent.
The Minister noted that even after the introduction of GST, India’s combined tax burden on tobacco products did not consistently meet global standards, making many products remain relatively affordable. This bill seeks to correct that gap and push tobacco consumption farther out of reach.

Debate in Parliament: Concern, Support and Calls for Review

The discussion saw a wide range of viewpoints:

  • Congress MP Pramod Tiwari raised worries about the effect on tobacco farmers and argued for sending the bill to a parliamentary committee.
  • TMC’s Sagarika Ghose stated that taxation alone will not reduce consumption unless accompanied by strong health awareness campaigns and tighter regulation on pan masala advertising.
  • AAP MP Sandeep Kumar Pathak questioned whether excessive taxes are the right tool to curb addiction.
  • AIADMK’s M Thambidurai supported the bill, calling it a timely reform that protects public health.

The debate also saw political exchanges, with the Finance Minister pushing back against claims from Trinamool Congress members on issues unrelated to the bill.

A Policy Shift with Far-Reaching Impact

The passage of the Central Excise (Amendment) Bill, 2025 signals a deliberate move towards stronger public health regulation backed by fiscal policy. Whether it significantly impacts tobacco consumption patterns will be seen over time, but the government has made its stance unmistakably clear: affordability should not enable addiction.

After the detailed discussion, the House adjourned, marking the close of a critical legislative day.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Our News Portal

We provide accurate, balanced, and impartial coverage of national and international affairs, focusing on the activities and developments within the parliament and its surrounding political landscape. We aim to foster informed public discourse and promote transparency in governance through our news articles, features, and opinion pieces.

Newsletter

Laest News

@2023 – All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by The Parliament News

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
-
00:00
00:00
Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00