Home Tags Posts tagged with "parliament"
Tag:

parliament

Monsoon Session Day 1

The Monsoon Session of Parliament began on 20 July 2026 with high expectations. The government entered the session hoping to push forward its legislative agenda, while the Opposition arrived determined to press for discussions on a series of contentious national issues. What followed was a day marked by repeated protests, multiple adjournments, and little legislative progress setting the tone for what could become one of the most closely watched parliamentary sessions of the year.

Ahead of the session, Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed the media outside Parliament, urging Members of Parliament across party lines to work together for a productive Monsoon Session. Stressing the importance of constructive debate, he highlighted India’s recent achievements in infrastructure, manufacturing, and other sectors while emphasizing that Parliament should remain focused on issues affecting citizens and national development.

The message was clear: the government wanted the session to begin with legislative business rather than political confrontation.

As soon as both Houses assembled, it became evident that the Opposition had different priorities.

Opposition MPs raised slogans and demanded immediate discussions on several issues they described as matters of urgent public importance. Their primary demands included a debate on the NEET controversy, allegations surrounding Ram Temple donations, and other political concerns that they argued deserved precedence over the government’s legislative agenda.

With members continuing their protests, normal proceedings could not begin as scheduled.

The Lok Sabha witnessed repeated interruptions almost immediately after convening. Appeals from the Chair for members to return to their seats had little effect as slogan-shouting continued. Question Hour and other scheduled business could not proceed, forcing the House to be adjourned multiple times throughout the day.

The Rajya Sabha experienced a similar situation. Repeated attempts to resume proceedings were met with fresh protests, leaving the Chair with little option but to adjourn the House as well.

By the end of the day, both Houses had lost valuable parliamentary time, and the government’s legislative agenda remained largely untouched.

While the repeated adjournments became the day’s headline, the disruptions were driven by deeper political disagreements.

The Opposition demanded a detailed discussion on the NEET issue, arguing that concerns surrounding the examination required immediate parliamentary attention. Several Opposition leaders called for accountability and sought a dedicated debate before the House moved on to other business.

Another issue raised during the protests related to allegations concerning donations collected for the Ram Temple. Opposition parties sought an official discussion on the matter, making it one of the central flashpoints of the day.

Questions surrounding delimitation, governance, and proposed legislative measures also featured prominently in the Opposition’s demands. Collectively, these issues shaped the confrontational atmosphere that prevailed throughout the session’s opening day.

Outside Parliament, Protests Continued

The political activity was not confined to the chambers of Parliament.

Demonstrations outside the Parliament complex added another dimension to the day’s events, with protesters voicing support for various Opposition demands. Security arrangements were strengthened as police managed crowds and restricted access near key entry points, underscoring the intensity of the political atmosphere beyond the House.

Day 1 highlighted the contrasting objectives of the two sides.

The government sought to begin the Monsoon Session by advancing its legislative programme and appealed for orderly debate. The Opposition, meanwhile, maintained that pressing national controversies required immediate discussion before any legislative business could move forward.

This difference in priorities resulted in a parliamentary stalemate, where neither side achieved its immediate objective.

The opening day of the Monsoon Session demonstrated that the coming weeks are likely to be politically charged. Rather than focusing on legislation, the first day became a contest over what Parliament’s priorities should be.

Repeated adjournments reflected not just procedural disruption but also the broader political contest between the government and the Opposition. As both sides remained firm in their positions, the likelihood of further confrontations in the days ahead appeared strong.

With several important Bills expected during the Monsoon Session and the Opposition showing no signs of backing down from its demands, the opening day’s events may only be the beginning of a larger parliamentary showdown.

Whether the government and the Opposition can find common ground or whether repeated disruptions continue to overshadow legislative business will shape not only the remainder of the session but also the broader political narrative in the weeks to come.

For now, Day 1 will be remembered less for the business Parliament conducted and more for the political battle that unfolded before any meaningful legislative work could begin.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
parliament

The upcoming Monsoon Session of Parliament, expected to commence in the last week of July, is likely to focus on an extensive legislative agenda, with five new bills and two pending bills expected to be taken up for consideration and passage, according to sources familiar with the proposed schedule.

The government is also expected to brief political parties on the legislative agenda during the customary all-party meeting ahead of the session.

Constitution Amendment Bills Not Yet on Tentative Agenda

According to sources, the tentative legislative agenda does not currently include any Constitution Amendment Bills.

There has been speculation regarding proposed constitutional amendments relating to delimitation and the Women’s Reservation framework. However, sources indicate that the government may proceed with such measures only after assessing the availability of the required two-thirds majority in Parliament.

Separately, there has also been discussion about possible Constitution Amendment Bills concerning the ‘One Nation, One Election’ proposal and provisions relating to elected representatives facing imprisonment. These proposals have not been included in the tentative agenda announced so far.

Pending Bills Expected to Return

Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026

One of the key pending legislations is the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026, which was introduced in the Lok Sabha on March 25, 2026.

The proposed amendments seek to strengthen transparency and oversight in the regulation of foreign contributions received by individuals and organisations in India.

The bill is expected to be taken up for discussion and passage during the Monsoon Session.

Viksit Bharat Education Establishment Bill, 2025

The Viksit Bharat Education Establishment Bill, 2025, introduced in December 2025, was referred to a Joint Committee of Parliament for detailed examination.

Further consideration of the bill is expected after the committee submits its report during the upcoming session.

New Bills Likely to Be Introduced

Among the proposed new legislations, two bills are expected to replace ordinances promulgated earlier.

Income Tax (Amendment) Bill, 2026

The proposed Income Tax (Amendment) Bill, 2026 will replace an earlier ordinance.

According to the government, the legislation aims to strengthen India’s sovereign debt market, improve market liquidity, attract global capital flows, and support financial stability amid global geopolitical uncertainties, volatile crude oil prices, and supply chain disruptions.

Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026

This bill seeks to increase the sanctioned strength of Supreme Court judges from 33 to 37, excluding the Chief Justice of India.

The proposed expansion is intended to help reduce the backlog of pending cases and improve the timely disposal of matters before the country’s highest court.

Registration of Births and Deaths (Amendment) Bill, 2026

The bill proposes amendments to Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969.

The objective is to introduce stricter and more streamlined procedures for the delayed registration of births and deaths.

Prevention of Insults to National Honour (Amendment) Bill, 2026

The proposed legislation seeks to amend the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971.

It aims to strengthen legal provisions concerning acts that disrespect national symbols or undermine national honour.

MSME Development (Amendment) Bill, 2026

The Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (Amendment) Bill, 2026 seeks to promote ease of doing business and trust-based regulation within the MSME sector.

The proposed amendments are expected to strengthen mechanisms for addressing delayed payments to MSMEs while providing greater implementation powers to state governments.

Supplementary Demands for Grants

Apart from legislative business, the government is also expected to present the Demands for Supplementary Grants for parliamentary discussion and approval.

Members of Parliament will debate and vote on the additional expenditure proposals as part of the government’s financial business during the session.

Session Expected to Be Legislatively Significant

The Monsoon Session is expected to feature discussions on economic reforms, judicial administration, education, governance, and regulatory changes affecting multiple sectors.

While the tentative legislative agenda provides an indication of the government’s priorities, the final List of Business will be released before the session begins and may be revised based on parliamentary requirements.

Key Bills at a Glance

  • Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026 (Pending)
  • Viksit Bharat Education Establishment Bill, 2025 (Pending)
  • Income Tax (Amendment) Bill, 2026
  • Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026
  • Registration of Births and Deaths (Amendment) Bill, 2026
  • Prevention of Insults to National Honour (Amendment) Bill, 2026
  • MSME Development (Amendment) Bill, 2026

Note: The above legislative agenda is based on information from sources. The final List of Business for the Monsoon Session will be confirmed by the Government before Parliament convenes.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
.

The Union Cabinet has approved a draft amendment Bill aimed at operationalising the Women’s Reservation Act in time for the 2029 Lok Sabha elections.

The decision was taken at a Cabinet meeting chaired by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The proposed amendment seeks to revise the implementation framework of the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam, formally known as the Constitution (106th Amendment) Act, which was passed in 2023.

Expansion of Lok Sabha Strength

A key provision in the proposal is the expansion of the Lok Sabha from its current strength of 543 seats to 816 seats. This increase will follow a fresh delimitation exercise aimed at redrawing constituency boundaries.

One-Third Reservation for Women

Out of the expanded House, approximately one-third of the seats 273 in total are proposed to be reserved for women. The reservation will also apply within Scheduled Caste (SC) and Scheduled Tribe (ST) categories, ensuring representation across different social groups.

Delimitation Based on 2011 Census

In a departure from earlier provisions, the government plans to conduct delimitation based on the 2011 Census data, instead of waiting for updated population figures from a future Census.

This move is intended to expedite the implementation of women’s reservation, which under the existing framework was linked to the completion of a new Census and subsequent delimitation exercise.

Next Steps in Parliament

The amendment Bill is expected to be introduced and taken up for discussion during the extended sittings of the Budget Session scheduled from April 16 to April 18.

The proposed changes mark a significant step toward operationalising women’s reservation in Parliament, with implementation targeted ahead of the next general elections in 2029.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Lok Sabha

Both Houses of Parliament were adjourned on Thursday, with the ongoing Budget Session set to reconvene on April 16 after a scheduled recess.

Key Legislation Passed in Lok Sabha

The Lok Sabha passed the Central Armed Police Forces (General Administration) Bill, 2026, by voice vote. The legislation had earlier been approved by the Rajya Sabha.

The Bill outlines provisions related to deputation in senior ranks within Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs). It mandates that 50% of posts at the rank of Inspector General be filled through deputation, while at least 67% of Additional Director General posts are to be filled in a similar manner. Positions at the ranks of Special Director General and Director General are to be filled entirely through deputation.

Rajya Sabha Clears Jan Vishwas Amendment Bill

The Rajya Sabha passed the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Bill by voice vote. The legislation proposes wide-ranging changes across multiple laws.

It aims to amend 784 provisions across 79 Central Acts administered by 23 ministries. Of these, 717 provisions are set to be decriminalised, while 67 provisions are to be modified, with the objective of improving regulatory compliance and facilitating ease of living.

Amaravati Recognised as Andhra Pradesh Capital

Parliament also passed a Bill recognising Amaravati as the sole and permanent capital of Andhra Pradesh. The Rajya Sabha approved the legislation by voice vote, with support from most political parties, while the YSR Congress Party opposed the measure.

Session to Reconvene for Constitutional Amendments

Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju confirmed that the Budget Session would not be adjourned sine die but placed in recess.

He stated that Parliament would reconvene for a specific period to consider amendments related to the Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, commonly referred to as the Women’s Reservation Act, 2023.

Legislative Activity Continues

The session saw the passage of several key bills across both Houses, reflecting ongoing legislative activity on administrative reforms, governance frameworks, and policy implementation.

The reconvening of Parliament later in April is expected to focus on constitutional and legislative priorities currently under consideration.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Finance Bill 2026 Passed in Lok Sabha

New Delhi: The Lok Sabha passed the Finance Bill, 2026, marking a key legislative step required to implement proposals outlined in the Union Budget for 2026–27.

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman addressed the House during the discussion on the Bill, which was later approved through a voice vote. The legislation provides legal backing for changes in income tax rates, as well as revisions in customs and excise duties.

Opposition Raises Concerns

Several Opposition members opposed the introduction of the Bill, raising concerns over specific provisions. Among those who spoke against it were Manish Tewari, Sougata Ray, and T Sumathy.

They argued that certain provisions in the proposed legislation could weaken aspects of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) regulations. The government, however, proceeded with the passage of the Bill.

Protest Over LPG Supply Concerns

Outside Parliament, Opposition leaders staged a protest within the Parliament House complex over concerns related to a reported LPG supply crunch linked to the ongoing conflict in West Asia.

Leaders including Mallikarjun Kharge, Supriya Sule, Dharmendra Yadav, Sudama Prasad, T Sumathy, and Mahua Maji were among those present near the Makar Dwar during the demonstration.

All-Party Meeting on West Asia Crisis

Amid rising concerns over the geopolitical situation in West Asia, Union Home Minister Amit Shah is scheduled to chair an all-party meeting later in the day.

The meeting aims to brief political leaders on the evolving situation and its potential economic and security implications for India. The initiative follows remarks by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in both Houses of Parliament, where he described the situation as an unprecedented crisis with possible long-term effects.

The government’s outreach to political parties comes as global developments continue to influence energy markets and domestic supply concerns.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Lok Sabha Passes Appropriation Bill 2026

The Lok Sabha passed the Appropriation Bill 2026 following several adjournments triggered by protests from Opposition members. The Bill authorises the government to withdraw additional funds from the Consolidated Fund of India to meet expenditure for the financial year 2025–26.

The passage of the Bill came after the House approved the Supplementary Demands for Grants through a voice vote. These demands allow the government to seek additional financial allocations beyond the budget estimates for the ongoing financial year.

During the discussion, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman announced the creation of an Economic Stabilisation Fund worth ₹1 lakh crore. The fund is intended to provide fiscal flexibility and enable the government to respond to global economic challenges that may affect the Indian economy.

According to the Finance Minister, the proposed fund will create fiscal space that can be used if global developments place pressure on economic stability. The initiative is aimed at strengthening the government’s capacity to manage economic risks arising from international developments.

Meanwhile, members of the Opposition coalition submitted a notice in both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha seeking the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. The notice marks the first time such a proposal has been submitted in Parliament against a sitting Chief Election Commissioner.

The notice was signed by 130 Members of Parliament from the Lok Sabha and 63 members from the Rajya Sabha. It lists several allegations related to the conduct of the Chief Election Commissioner during his tenure.

The charges mentioned in the notice include claims of partisan conduct, discriminatory actions in office, obstruction of investigations related to electoral irregularities, and allegations of disenfranchisement of voters. The proposal seeks parliamentary consideration of these claims under the constitutional process governing the removal of an Election Commissioner.

Separately, the Lok Sabha also witnessed a heated exchange during the discussion on the supplementary demands for grants. Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi raised allegations concerning Union Minister Hardeep Singh Puri during his speech in the House.

The remarks led to a confrontation between Mr. Gandhi and Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, resulting in disruptions during the proceedings. The exchange contributed to repeated interruptions in the House before legislative business resumed.

Despite the disruptions, the government was able to complete the passage of the Appropriation Bill, allowing the authorised funds to be withdrawn for government expenditure for the financial year 2025–26.

The developments reflect continuing political disagreements between the government and Opposition parties during the current parliamentary session, with debates focusing on financial legislation as well as institutional issues raised by Opposition members.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Industrial Relations Code (Amendment) Bill, 2026

New Delhi, February 12, 2026: The Lok Sabha on Thursday passed the Industrial Relations Code (Amendment) Bill, 2026, aimed at ensuring legal clarity regarding the repeal of certain labour laws replaced by the Industrial Relations Code, 2020.

The amendment introduces savings provisions to avoid what the government described as any “future unwarranted complication” over the continuity of laws subsumed under the 2020 Code.

The Industrial Relations Code, 2020 consolidated and replaced three major labour legislations: the Trade Unions Act, 1926; the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; and the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. These laws governed trade unions, industrial employment conditions, and industrial dispute resolution.

Clarifying the Repeal Provision

According to the statement of objects and reasons of the amendment Bill, Section 104 of the Industrial Relations Code already provides for the repeal of the earlier enactments. However, the government said there was a possibility of confusion arising from a “misconceived ground” that the Code delegated the power to repeal those laws to the executive.

The statement clarified that the repeal had occurred by operation of Section 104 itself, and that a notification issued in February 2026 reaffirmed this position. The amendment, it said, is intended to prevent any future legal uncertainty.

“It is considered desirable to introduce the proposed amendment to avoid any future unwarranted complication,” the statement said.

Savings provisions are typically included in legislation to preserve actions, rights, obligations, and proceedings initiated under repealed laws, thereby ensuring continuity and legal certainty.

Government’s Position

Replying to the discussion before the passage of the Bill, Labour Minister Mansukh Mandaviya said the four Labour Codes implemented nearly three months ago ensure key protections for workers.

He stated that the Codes guarantee minimum wages, mandate the issuance of appointment letters, and provide for uniform wages for the same work irrespective of gender.

The four Labour Codes covering wages, industrial relations, social security, and occupational safety were enacted to consolidate multiple central labour laws into a simplified framework. The government has maintained that the reform improves compliance and strengthens worker protections while promoting ease of doing business.

Opposition Criticism

During the debate, members of the Opposition criticised the government’s approach to labour reforms.

Congress MP K. Suresh said that instead of dialogue, the government “has chosen to dominate labourers.” He referred to a strike call given by workers on Thursday, describing it as a “warning signal” and reflecting what he termed policy shortcomings in addressing labour concerns.

Mr. Suresh also contrasted the current government’s approach with that of the previous United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, citing the introduction of schemes such as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) and the National Food Security Act as examples of pro-labour policies.

The debate highlighted differing political perspectives on labour reforms and their implementation. While the government emphasised legal clarity and structural reform, Opposition members raised concerns about consultation and worker safeguards.

With the Lok Sabha’s approval, the amendment Bill moves forward in the legislative process.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Lok Sabha

New Delhi, February 11, 2026: Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi on Wednesday criticised the interim trade agreement between India and the United States, describing it as “one-sided” and alleging that the government had compromised national interests. Speaking in the Lok Sabha, he said the agreement amounted to a “wholesale surrender” and claimed it affected India’s energy security and farmers’ interests.

During his address, Mr. Gandhi alleged that the government had “sold Bharat Mata” through the agreement. He argued that the deal had placed India in a disadvantageous position in negotiations with the United States. He further stated that if an INDIA Bloc government had negotiated the agreement, it would have insisted that India be treated as an equal partner.

Referring to U.S. President Donald Trump, Mr. Gandhi said an alternative government would have clearly conveyed that India must be respected as an equal in bilateral trade discussions. He emphasised that trade negotiations should protect domestic economic priorities and strategic autonomy.

The interim trade agreement between India and the United States has been positioned by the government as a step toward strengthening economic cooperation between the two countries. While specific details of the agreement were not elaborated upon during the debate, it is understood to involve trade facilitation measures and sector-specific adjustments aimed at boosting bilateral commerce.

India and the United States are major trading partners, with cooperation spanning goods, services, technology, defence, and energy. In recent years, both sides have sought to resolve tariff disputes and expand market access in sectors such as agriculture, energy, and manufacturing. Interim agreements are typically seen as transitional arrangements while broader negotiations continue.

Opposition members raised concerns in the House about the potential impact of the agreement on farmers and domestic industries. Mr. Gandhi stated that India’s energy security had been “handed over to America,” though he did not provide detailed data during his speech to substantiate the claim. He maintained that any trade arrangement must safeguard critical sectors and ensure that Indian producers are not placed at a disadvantage.

The government has not yet issued a detailed response to Mr. Gandhi’s remarks in Parliament. However, officials have previously stated that trade discussions with the United States are guided by national interest and aim to create opportunities for Indian businesses while maintaining strategic balance.

Trade agreements often involve complex negotiations over tariffs, quotas, regulatory standards, and market access. Such agreements can influence multiple sectors, including agriculture, energy imports, manufacturing exports, and digital services. Analysts note that interim deals are sometimes used to build confidence between negotiating partners before finalising comprehensive frameworks.

The debate in the Lok Sabha reflects broader political differences over economic diplomacy and trade policy. While the ruling coalition has emphasised deeper economic integration with key global partners, the Opposition has called for greater transparency and stronger protections for domestic sectors.

Further details regarding the implementation timeline and sectoral impact of the interim trade agreement are expected to emerge as discussions continue.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Amid continued disruptions in the Budget Session, Opposition parties led by the Congress on Tuesday submitted a no-confidence motion seeking the removal of Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla.

The notice was submitted during repeated adjournments and ruckus in the Lower House, which was adjourned till 2.00 p.m. on Tuesday (February 10, 2026). Chief Whip of the Congress in the Lok Sabha Kodikunnil Suresh and party Whip Mohammed Jawed Ahmed handed over the notice to Lok Sabha Secretary-General Utpal Kumar Singh, sources said.

Constitutional provision and submission

According to Article 94(c) of the Constitution, a Lok Sabha member may give written notice of intention to move a resolution for the removal of the Speaker to the Secretary-General, with a minimum notice period of 14 days.

Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi said the motion was submitted at 1:14 p.m. on Tuesday. He stated that the primary concern of the Opposition was that the Leader of Opposition had not been allowed to speak on several occasions. He added that many Opposition parties shared this concern.

“At 1:14 p.m. today we submitted a motion expressing no-confidence and asking for removal of Speaker Om Birla as per Rule 94(c),” Mr. Gogoi said in a statement.

Signatories and parties involved

The notice seeking the removal of Mr. Birla bears 119 signatures. Among the signatories are DMK MP T.R. Baalu and Samajwadi Party MP Dimple Yadav. Members of the Trinamool Congress did not sign the notice.

Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi has also not signed the motion, as one of the charges in the notice relates to him allegedly not being allowed to speak in the House.

Opposition parties that have signed the notice include the Congress, RJD, Samajwadi Party, DMK, and Left parties.

Allegations against the Speaker

The Congress has accused the Speaker of acting in a partisan manner and denying Rahul Gandhi the opportunity to speak during the debate on the Motion of Thanks to the President’s address.

The notice also refers to the recent suspension of eight Opposition MPs by the Speaker for what was described as unruly behaviour, seven of whom belong to the Congress.

Additionally, the notice alleges differential treatment by the Chair, stating that a BJP member was allowed to make personalised attacks on two former Prime Ministers, while no action was taken despite objections raised by the Opposition.

The motion further objects to remarks made by the Speaker in the House that he had “concrete information” suggesting that several Congress MPs might move towards Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s seat and carry out an “unexpected act.” The notice described this statement as an abuse of the constitutional office of the Speaker.

Separate letter by women MPs

Separately, eight women Members of Parliament from the Congress wrote to the Speaker on Monday (February 9), alleging that they were being targeted because they had “consistently fought against PM Modi’s anti-people government and demanded accountability from him.”

The no-confidence motion marks a significant escalation in the ongoing confrontation between the Opposition and the government during the Budget Session.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Parliament Budget Session

The Budget Session of Parliament on Friday was marked by repeated disruptions and political confrontation, resulting in frequent adjournments in both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha. Opposition protests prevented the scheduled business from being carried out, and both Houses were eventually adjourned for the day. Proceedings are set to resume on Monday at 11 am.

In the Lok Sabha, a general discussion on the Union Budget 2026–27 was initiated. However, continuous sloganeering by Opposition members disrupted the debate, preventing detailed discussion on budgetary proposals. Due to the sustained disruptions, most of the listed agenda items could not be taken up.

The Rajya Sabha also witnessed interruptions during the day. Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed the Upper House, where he defended the government’s economic and foreign policy approach. Referring to India’s growing engagement with the United States and the European Union, the Prime Minister described these agreements as significant for global economic stability.

The Prime Minister’s remarks drew sharp reactions from Opposition parties, leading to further protests. Several suspended Members of Parliament staged demonstrations both inside and outside the Parliament complex, alleging that the government had entered into unfavourable international trade arrangements. Some Opposition leaders described these arrangements as a “US–India trap deal”.

Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge criticised the Prime Minister’s address, alleging that the government was repeating misleading claims and avoiding accountability on key national issues.

The repeated disruptions throughout the day resulted in a substantial loss of parliamentary time. Political confrontation dominated proceedings, overshadowing substantive discussion on the Union Budget.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts

Our News Portal

We provide accurate, balanced, and impartial coverage of national and international affairs, focusing on the activities and developments within the parliament and its surrounding political landscape. We aim to foster informed public discourse and promote transparency in governance through our news articles, features, and opinion pieces.

Newsletter

Laest News

@2023 – All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by The Parliament News

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
-
00:00
00:00
Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00