Home Tags Posts tagged with "Putin"
Tag:

Putin

Russia assaults Ukraine

A Night Kyiv Won’t Soon Forget

Kyiv woke up to smoke, shattered windows, and emergency sirens after one of the largest coordinated attacks in months. In the early hours of Friday, Russia launched a sweeping assault across Ukraine, directing the bulk of its firepower at the capital. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy reported that over 430 drones paired with 18 missile strikes formed the backbone of the offensive—an operation he described as “deliberately engineered to inflict maximum harm on civilians.”

Four people lost their lives. At least 27 were injured. Many escaped collapsed ceilings, burning cars, or falling debris that rained down across multiple districts.

“A Calculated Strike Against Civilians”: Zelenskyy Responds

In a public statement, Zelenskyy condemned the attack as an attempt to break the will of the population. He confirmed that the Azerbaijan Embassy in Kyiv suffered damage from missile fragments—an incident likely to trigger diplomatic repercussions.

Emergency workers rushed between neighbourhoods through the night, often battling fires while air-defence systems were still active overhead.

District-By-District Impact: A City Under Fire

Darnytskyi District

Debris from intercepted missiles hit the yard of a residential building and an educational institution. A car caught fire after being struck by falling fragments.

Dniprovskyi District

Three apartment blocks and a private household sustained heavy damage. Fires spread across open areas, forcing responders to cordon off the zone.

Podilskyi District

Five residential structures and one nonresidential building were battered by falling missile remnants.

Shevchenkivskyi District

Debris sparked fires near a medical facility and inside a commercial building. Smoke blanketed parts of the district before dawn.

Holosiivskyi District

A medical facility caught fire after being hit, and a nearby building suffered structural damage.

Desnianskyi District

Two residential buildings recorded fires after debris tore through roofs and upper floors.

Solomianskyi District

A residential building’s roof was engulfed in flames, requiring hours of containment efforts.

Sviatoshynskyi District

A private home burned after being struck by falling fragments—one of many fires stretching emergency resources thin.

Kyiv Region: Infrastructure Targeted Again

Outside the city limits, Russian strikes hit critical infrastructure and private homes, injuring at least one civilian. A 55-year-old man in Bila Tserkva suffered severe burns and remains hospitalised.

Fires also erupted in several suburban neighbourhoods. Local authorities warned of potential power and water outages, signalling possible longer-term disruptions.

A Pattern of Escalation – And a Warning of What’s Next

This attack highlights a worrying trend: increasingly complex, multi-layered barrages intended to overwhelm Ukraine’s defences. Analysts note that the combination of mass drone swarms with ballistic and cruise missiles is becoming more frequent—and more destructive.

Emergency teams and residents alike are bracing for the possibility that this assault will not be the last.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
SCO Summit

August 31 – September 1, Tianjin, China — The 25th Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit stands as a monumental event, marking a turning point in both regional and global diplomacy. This year’s summit gathered world leaders, most notably Russian President Vladimir Putin, Chinese President Xi Jinping, and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The high-profile summit didn’t just focus on regional security, but also aimed to create new diplomatic pathways for global cooperation.

Putin’s Vision for a More Inclusive Global System

Ahead of the summit, President Putin articulated a bold vision of cooperation between Russia and China, with a clear message that their efforts will be for the benefit of all humanity. He emphasized the need to reform global governance systems, advocating for a more inclusive, non-discriminatory approach to institutions like the World Bank and the IMF. Putin underscored the importance of a fairer global financial system—one that doesn’t isolate developing nations or use sanctions as a tool for political leverage. His message positioned BRICS and the SCO as central pillars in the evolving global structure, aimed at promoting equality among nations, especially in the Global South.

India and China Move Toward Normalization

One of the most significant developments at the SCO Summit was the announcement that India and China will resume direct flights. After years of strained relations, this agreement marks a crucial step toward rebuilding diplomatic ties. The decision comes after months of back-channel negotiations, and it reflects both nations’ intent to move beyond the challenges of the past. The resumed flights will serve as a direct link between major cities in India and China, paving the way for increased trade, tourism, and people-to-people exchanges.

This announcement marks a significant softening of the relationship between the two countries, following the turbulence of the Galwan Valley conflict. Resuming direct flights is a tangible sign of the desire to improve bilateral relations and reinstate cooperation at multiple levels, including economics, culture, and diplomacy.

SCO Summit: A Platform for Multilateral Cooperation

This year’s SCO Summit also served as an important platform for countries in the Global South to amplify their voices. With over 20 member states, the SCO continues to grow in both influence and relevance, especially in addressing global challenges. The summit’s outcomes reflected an increasing push for greater multilateral engagement, both in security and economic domains.

  • Reforming Global Institutions: Putin’s call for reform echoed across many speeches at the summit. The growing power of BRICS and SCO member countries is pushing for a new world order—one that does not prioritize Western dominance but ensures equality for emerging and developing economies.
  • India-China Thaw: The announcement of resuming direct flights between India and China marked a crucial diplomatic gesture. The decision follows the positive momentum of dialogue between the two countries, which have been in the process of rebuilding trust since their border clashes.
  • Strengthening SCO’s Role: The SCO is increasingly seen as a platform that fosters cooperation not just in the security domain, but across economic, technological, and humanitarian issues. This year’s summit, with its growing number of participants and ever-expanding agenda, reinforces the organization’s potential to shape global affairs.

Conclusion: A Defining Moment in Global Diplomacy

The 2025 SCO Summit in Tianjin has been a crucial juncture in global geopolitics, offering both symbolic gestures and practical outcomes. The resumption of India-China flights is a breakthrough in bilateral relations, while Putin’s call for reform represents a clear effort to reshape global governance to be more inclusive and representative of the Global South.

The SCO, underlining its expanding role in world affairs, has shown its potential as a pivotal platform in the coming years, where multilateral cooperation can lead to more balanced global solutions. The summit has created a path toward renewed diplomatic engagement and a more equitable global order, where both regional cooperation and global reforms go hand-in-hand.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
ukrine-russia

Kyiv, June 6, 2025 — Following one of the most intense aerial assaults in recent months, Ukraine has urgently appealed to the international community to intensify pressure on Russia. The overnight barrage of over 400 drones and more than 40 missiles caused severe civilian casualties and infrastructure damage, prompting renewed calls from Ukrainian leaders for decisive global intervention.

President Zelenskyy: “Delay Equals Complicity”

In a strongly worded statement, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy condemned the attack and warned that inaction from the international community would make others complicit in the ongoing violence.

“If someone does not put pressure and gives the war more time to take lives, they are complicit and responsible. We need to act decisively,” Mr. Zelenskyy wrote on social media.

The President’s remarks came hours after Russian forces launched a night-long aerial assault, targeting several Ukrainian cities. The deadly offensive marked a dramatic escalation in hostilities.

Foreign Minister Sybiga: “Pressure Must Increase Immediately”

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiga also released a statement demanding a swift and united response from Ukraine’s international allies.

“Russia’s overnight attack on civilians once again demonstrates that the international pressure on Moscow must be increased as soon as possible,” said Mr. Sybiga.

He emphasized the strategic use of drone and missile warfare by Russia as a continued violation of international norms and an affront to civilian safety.

A Call for Global Solidarity

Ukraine’s leadership has made it clear that time is of the essence. Delayed diplomatic or military responses, they argue, provide Russia with the latitude to escalate further attacks. Kyiv is pushing for:

  • Stronger sanctions against Russian energy and defense sectors
  • Accelerated military aid, including advanced air defense systems
  • Formal condemnations in international forums such as the UN and G7
  • Legal accountability for war crimes under international law

Implications for Regional and Global Security

The intensifying conflict continues to have broader geopolitical implications. Beyond the humanitarian crisis, the use of drone and missile strikes raises concerns over regional instability in Eastern Europe and risks to global energy and grain supply chains.

Analysts suggest that a delay in coordinated international response could embolden further aggression, not just from Russia, but from other authoritarian regimes observing the global reaction.

As Ukraine reels from its latest trauma, its message to the world is unequivocal: Decisive action is not just a choice—it is a responsibility. Delay, Kyiv warns, equates to complicity. With the international community already on alert, the coming days will likely test the resolve of Ukraine’s allies and the future trajectory of the war.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

In a striking development, former U.S. President Donald Trump has expressed optimism about ending the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war following what he described as “very good and productive discussions” with Russian President Vladimir Putin. The revelation came through Trump’s post on Truth Social, where he hinted at a possible breakthrough in the brutal conflict that has ravaged the region for over two years.

A Direct Plea to Putin

Trump disclosed that he had made a “strong request” to Putin, urging him to spare the lives of Ukrainian soldiers reportedly surrounded on the battlefield. While the details remain scarce, this appeal signals a rare moment where a former U.S. leader is seen attempting to mediate between the warring nations.

“There is a very good chance that this horrible, bloody war can finally come to an end,” Trump stated, indicating a glimmer of hope for a ceasefire that could halt further devastation.

Backchannel Diplomacy in Moscow

Adding to the intrigue, reports have surfaced that U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff held a lengthy meeting with Putin in Moscow on Thursday night. The specifics of this high-level conversation remain undisclosed, but sources suggest that Putin used the meeting to send diplomatic “signals” to Trump.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov confirmed this indirect exchange, noting that both sides are now working on scheduling a direct phone conversation between the two leaders. The prospect of Trump and Putin engaging in dialogue has set off speculation about the former president’s potential role in future peace negotiations.

A Ceasefire in Sight?

Trump has long warned about the escalating dangers of the war, cautioning that if left unchecked, it could spiral into World War III. His latest comments reaffirm his stance that an immediate ceasefire is crucial to prevent further bloodshed.

The geopolitical landscape is shifting rapidly, and if Trump’s backchannel efforts prove effective, the world could witness one of the most significant diplomatic breakthroughs in modern history. However, whether Ukraine, Russia, and global leaders align on a peace deal remains to be seen.

For now, the world watches as a possible turning point emerges—one that could either lead to peace or intensify the diplomatic chess game that has kept the war raging for far too long.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

In a move that has sent ripples across the geopolitical landscape, former US President Donald Trump hinted at a potential meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin “very soon,” as high-stakes diplomatic talks in Saudi Arabia loom. The revelation comes at a critical juncture, with the Ukraine war now inching toward its third anniversary and diplomatic efforts intensifying to broker an elusive peace deal.

A Secretive Diplomatic Push?

Speaking to reporters after a flight aboard Air Force One, Trump confirmed that his team has been engaged in “long and hard” discussions with Russian officials, including a reported three-hour meeting between his Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, and Putin. These talks, though largely behind closed doors, signal a shift in approach, as Trump appears convinced that Putin is seeking an end to hostilities.

“I think he wants to stop fighting,” Trump remarked, though he remained ambiguous about the conditions under which such a ceasefire might be brokered. When pressed about Putin’s broader intentions—specifically whether he harbors ambitions of seizing all of Ukraine—Trump suggested he had personally posed the same question to the Russian leader.

“If he’s going to go on… that would have caused me a big problem,” Trump stated, hinting at the potential red lines that might define his approach to negotiations.

Zelensky’s Warning: NATO in the Crosshairs?

While Trump downplayed concerns over continued Russian aggression, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky delivered a stark warning, arguing that a weakened NATO could embolden Putin to escalate beyond Ukraine.

Zelensky’s cautionary remarks reflect growing unease in Kyiv, particularly amid speculation that a Trump-led US administration might scale back support for Ukraine and NATO at large. However, Trump dismissed these fears outright, telling reporters he was “not even a little bit” concerned about Zelensky’s statements.

Rubio’s Realism: Peace Talks Won’t Be a One-Day Fix

Meanwhile, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio sought to temper expectations, emphasizing that resolving such a protracted conflict would “not be easy.” Set to lead a high-level US delegation to Riyadh for upcoming talks, Rubio acknowledged the complexity of brokering peace, stating that “a process towards peace is not a one-meeting thing.”

Adding to the diplomatic uncertainty, Rubio also confirmed he was unsure who Moscow planned to send to the Saudi-hosted discussions. This ambiguity raises questions about the true intent behind Russia’s participation and whether genuine negotiations will take place or if this is merely another strategic maneuver.

A Ceasefire on the Horizon?

One of the most striking developments came last Wednesday when Trump and Putin reportedly held a lengthy phone call, culminating in an agreement to begin ceasefire negotiations immediately. However, this move blindsided NATO allies and Kyiv alike, with Zelensky firmly reiterating that “no decisions about Ukraine [should be made] without Ukraine.”

Rubio, who spoke with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov on Saturday, remained cautious about the prospect of a breakthrough. “Right now there is no process,” he stated bluntly. “One phone call does not make peace.”

The Path Forward: Diplomacy or Political Theater?

With Riyadh set to host crucial discussions in the coming days, the world watches as political heavyweights maneuver for leverage. The coming weeks will reveal whether Trump’s confidence in Putin’s willingness to end the war is based on reality or misplaced optimism.

As Rubio succinctly put it, “The next few weeks and days will determine whether this is serious or not.”

For now, speculation runs rampant: Is this the first tangible step toward ending the bloodshed, or merely another chapter in the geopolitical chess game between superpowers? Only time will tell.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

In a dramatic turn of events, Bashar al-Assad, Syria’s long-standing leader, fled to Moscow earlier this month following a stunning rebel advance that ended five decades of Assad family rule. The collapse of Assad’s regime, marked by years of civil war and widespread allegations of human rights abuses, has brought the region into the global spotlight.

However, Russian President Vladimir Putin has dismissed suggestions that Assad’s downfall signals a defeat for Russia. Speaking at his annual end-of-year press conference, Putin firmly stated that Moscow’s intervention in Syria had achieved its primary objectives.

Russia’s Mission in Syria

Putin reflected on Russia’s decade-long involvement in Syria, emphasizing that their core goal was to prevent the establishment of a terrorist stronghold akin to Afghanistan. “On the whole, we have achieved our goal,” he asserted, countering claims that Assad’s departure represents a setback for Moscow.

Russia had been a staunch ally of Assad, intervening militarily in 2015 and altering the course of the conflict. Despite Assad’s recent fall, Putin reiterated that Russia’s role was never about propping up individual leaders but about ensuring stability and combating terrorism in the region.

Moscow’s Strategic Interests

The situation has also reignited discussions about Russia’s military foothold in Syria. The Kremlin maintains two critical military bases in the country: the Tartus naval base and the Hmeimim air base. These bases are pivotal for Russia’s strategic operations in Africa and the Middle East.

Putin highlighted the widespread regional support for maintaining these outposts. “An overwhelming majority of [regional actors] say they are interested in our military bases staying there,” he revealed.

Engagement with Assad

Though Assad has sought refuge in Moscow, Putin disclosed that he had not yet met with the former Syrian leader but intended to do so soon. This meeting is expected to address Syria’s future and Moscow’s ongoing role in the region.

In a surprising development, Putin also mentioned that Russia had facilitated the evacuation of 4,000 Iranian soldiers from Syria at Tehran’s request, further underscoring Moscow’s influence and diplomacy in the conflict-ridden region.

A Calculated Perspective

For the Kremlin, Syria has always represented more than just a battlefield. It has been a stage to demonstrate Russia’s geopolitical strength, challenge Western dominance, and solidify its presence in the Middle East. Despite Assad’s fall, Moscow appears focused on securing its strategic gains rather than dwelling on the regime change.

While Assad’s departure signals the end of an era for Syria, Russia’s influence in the region remains robust. By reframing its involvement as a mission to prevent terrorism and stabilize the area, Moscow seeks to underscore its accomplishments rather than its losses.

The coming weeks will likely shed light on how Putin’s government maneuvers through this transitional phase, ensuring its foothold in Syria while navigating the broader geopolitical implications of Assad’s fall.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Russian President Vladimir Putin praised U.S. President-elect Donald Trump as a “capable and intelligent politician” while voicing grave concerns about his safety following several assassination attempts. At the same time, Putin warned of the deployment of Russia’s formidable Oreshnik missiles, heightening tensions over the ongoing war in Ukraine.

Putin’s Praise and Warnings for Trump

During a press conference in Kazakhstan, Putin expressed admiration for Donald Trump’s political acumen, suggesting the former U.S. president has the potential to negotiate a resolution to the war in Ukraine. However, Putin’s comments took a chilling turn as he highlighted assassination attempts targeting Trump during his campaign, including a July incident in Pennsylvania where Trump was grazed by a bullet and another at Mar-A-Lago in September.

Putin condemned these attacks as “absolutely uncivilized” and emphasized the precariousness of Trump’s safety. “Despite his intelligence and experience, Trump remains at risk. I urge him to stay vigilant,” Putin stated. He also speculated on the Biden administration’s escalating support for Ukraine, suggesting it might be an effort to entangle Trump in strained U.S.-Russia relations should he return to power.

Trump has repeatedly claimed he could end the war within 24 hours of assuming office, though the specifics of his plan remain undisclosed.

Oreshnik Missile Threat Looms Over Kyiv

On a graver note, Putin issued a stark warning to Ukraine, revealing the potential deployment of Russia’s advanced Oreshnik intermediate-range missiles. Used recently in Dnipro, these missiles are described as nearly impervious to air defense systems and capable of carrying multiple warheads, including nuclear payloads.

“We do not rule out using the Oreshnik missiles against military facilities, industrial targets, or decision-making centers, including Kyiv,” Putin declared. The missiles, he added, possess destructive power comparable to nuclear strikes when deployed repeatedly on a single target, although they are not currently armed with nuclear warheads.

This escalation follows the West’s provision of long-range missiles to Ukraine, a move Putin perceives as retaliation for Russia’s aggressive military actions.

A Crossroads of Diplomacy and Escalation

While Putin reiterated Moscow’s openness to dialogue, his dual narrative of supporting Trump and threatening Kyiv underscores a complex geopolitical chessboard. His remarks reflect a blend of veiled support for Trump’s potential return to office and an unyielding stance on military dominance in Ukraine.

As the world watches these developments, Putin’s calculated messaging offers insight into Russia’s strategic priorities while further complicating the global diplomatic landscape.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

In a series of pivotal conversations just days after his election victory, President-elect Donald Trump reached out to key leaders involved in the ongoing Ukraine conflict, signaling a potential shift in US diplomatic strategy. On November 7, from his Florida resort, Trump took a high-stakes call with Russian President Vladimir Putin, urging him to avoid escalating the war in Ukraine. This call came just two days after Trump’s election victory, reflecting his intention to address critical foreign relations from the outset.

According to The Washington Post, Trump reminded Putin of the United States’ formidable military presence in Europe. While official confirmation of the call from the US and Russian governments is absent, sources familiar with the conversation indicate that Putin’s initial outreach, congratulating Trump on his election, paved the way for this exchange. Putin also reportedly expressed a desire to restore US-Russia relations and contribute to a peaceful resolution in Ukraine, hinting at his openness to working with Trump.

A Bold New Direction: Trump’s Approach to Foreign Policy

In response to Putin’s stated interest in mending ties, Trump advised the Russian leader to avoid further escalation in Ukraine, an approach that could signal a rethinking of the US stance on the region. Trump, who has often questioned the extent of US aid to Ukraine, has promised to quickly end the war, though specific plans remain unclarified.

Beyond his call with Putin, Trump engaged with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, reinforcing the US commitment to supporting Ukraine amid the conflict. Zelenskyy highlighted the importance of strong US leadership, emphasizing that close cooperation is crucial for achieving a fair resolution. Tech visionary Elon Musk, who has maintained Starlink satellite internet services for Ukraine, also joined the conversation with Zelenskyy, reiterating his commitment to maintaining connectivity in the region.

Rebuilding US-Russia Relations: A New Era?

At a public event in Sochi, Russia, just before the call, Putin voiced his openness to Trump’s diplomatic outreach. Stressing the importance of rebuilding US-Russia relations, he described the desire to bring peace to Ukraine as commendable. “If world leaders want to restore contact, I’m ready,” Putin said, adding that he found Trump’s resilience impressive, particularly after witnessing Trump’s handling of a July assassination attempt. Calling Trump a “brave man,” Putin’s comments reveal a sense of respect that could lay the groundwork for constructive dialogue.

Looking Ahead: What This Means for Global Diplomacy

Trump’s recent outreach to both Putin and Zelenskyy could set a new course in the Ukraine crisis, a move that has sparked intrigue around the globe. His direct diplomacy, coupled with the practical support of leaders like Musk, indicates that the incoming administration might take a hands-on approach to navigate the complexities of the Ukraine conflict.

As Trump prepares to take office in January, his conversations with Putin and Zelenskyy reflect a fresh approach aimed at reducing tensions and reevaluating the role of American military support abroad. While the world waits to see how these overtures will unfold, Trump’s early engagement with these two leaders hints at a renewed diplomatic strategy in an effort to reshape the landscape of US foreign policy.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

In a dramatic escalation of tensions, NATO finds itself in a state of heightened concern following a direct on-camera threat from Russian President Vladimir Putin. His warning, delivered in response to the West’s decision to permit Ukraine to use Western-supplied long-range missiles, has sent shockwaves through the global diplomatic community.

A Stark Warning from Putin

Vladimir Putin, visibly angered by the West’s strategic shift, warned of the potential for direct conflict, marking a significant development in the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war. His frustration stems from the West’s reported decision to remove restrictions on Ukraine’s use of long-range missiles, enabling deeper strikes into Russian territory. This decision follows months of lobbying by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who has repeatedly called for more powerful weaponry to defend his country and strike back at Russian forces.

As reported by The Guardian, this latest development could fundamentally alter the dynamics of the war, raising the risk of direct confrontation between Russia and NATO, an outcome that has long been feared by global leaders.

UK PM Keir Starmer’s Quick Response

The first response from NATO’s corner came from UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who addressed Putin’s threatening remarks with measured concern. Starmer, who has consistently advocated for a firm yet cautious approach to the conflict, emphasized the importance of NATO’s unity and its unwavering support for Ukraine. His statement highlighted the gravity of the situation, urging NATO allies to remain vigilant and avoid further escalation while ensuring Ukraine is equipped to defend itself.

Starmer’s reaction underscores the delicate balancing act NATO faces—supporting Ukraine’s defense without provoking a direct military clash with Russia, a scenario that could have devastating global consequences.

NATO’s Tightrope: Support for Ukraine vs. Risk of Escalation

NATO has long been wary of crossing lines that could spark a direct military conflict with Russia. The West’s latest move to allow Ukraine access to long-range missiles is a bold step, one that reflects the growing frustration within NATO over the prolonged conflict. However, it is also fraught with danger, as Putin’s latest remarks suggest.

For months, Ukraine has pleaded for more sophisticated weaponry to push back against Russian advances and strike deeper into occupied territories. By lifting the restrictions on long-range missile use, Western nations are effectively signaling a more aggressive stance, aligning themselves more closely with Ukraine’s military objectives.

However, Putin’s reaction demonstrates the fine line NATO must walk. His threats of direct conflict, though not new, carry a renewed intensity following this latest development. NATO now faces the dual challenge of supporting Ukraine while preventing a full-blown confrontation with Russia.

What’s Next?

As tensions between NATO and Russia continue to escalate, the global community watches with bated breath. Putin’s latest threat marks a dangerous turn in the conflict, and NATO leaders, including UK PM Keir Starmer, will be closely monitoring Russia’s next moves. Diplomatic channels are likely to remain open, but the risk of further escalation cannot be ruled out.

For NATO, the stakes have never been higher. The alliance’s ability to support Ukraine while avoiding a direct clash with Russia will be crucial in determining the future course of the war and, potentially, the stability of the entire region.

In the coming weeks, the world will look to NATO leaders for signs of how they will navigate this increasingly precarious situation. One thing is clear: the conflict has entered a new, more dangerous phase, and the path forward is fraught with uncertainty.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Russian President Vladimir Putin has openly thrown his support behind U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris as the favored presidential candidate for the upcoming 2024 election. This endorsement follows President Joe Biden’s exit from the race in July and comes just as U.S. officials accuse Russia of interfering in the country’s elections once again.

Speaking at the Eastern Economic Forum in Vladivostok on September 5, Putin announced, “I told you our favorite, if you can call it that, was the current President Mr. Biden. He was removed from the race, but he recommended all his supporters to support Ms. Harris. So we will do the same. We will support her.” The comments come at a critical moment, heightening tensions between the U.S. and Russia.

Putin’s endorsement is a sharp pivot from previous comments where he appeared to favor Donald Trump. However, in his speech, Putin acknowledged that Harris might take a different approach to U.S.-Russia relations compared to the Republican candidate, stating, “If Ms. Harris is doing well, then maybe she will refrain from actions of this kind,” referring to the sanctions Trump imposed on Russia during his tenure.

U.S. Government Pushes Back on Russian Influence

While Putin publicly picked sides, the Biden administration continues to condemn Russian efforts to meddle in the U.S. electoral process. Just a day before Putin’s remarks, U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland revealed details of Russia’s “covert campaign” to influence the upcoming presidential election. The Justice Department even unsealed a 71-page affidavit revealing charges against two Russia-based media employees accused of conspiring to launder money and violate the Federal Agents Registration Act.

National Security Spokesman John Kirby fired back, saying Putin “should just stay out of our elections.” It is evident that U.S. officials are not taking Russia’s latest moves lightly, with ongoing investigations into the country’s alleged creation of fake news sites and propaganda efforts.

A Complex History Between Trump and Putin

Although Donald Trump has been a consistent recipient of Putin’s praise in the past, this recent shift toward Harris raises eyebrows. Previously, the Russian president described Biden as “more experienced, more predictable” than Trump. Even Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov, while cautious in assessing Harris’ potential candidacy, pointed out that her actions towards Russia haven’t yet resulted in significant developments, either positively or negatively.

With the U.S. election on the horizon, the backdrop of these geopolitical exchanges is set to add more fuel to an already heated contest. The Kremlin’s recent remarks and the growing concern of Russian interference make the 2024 race even more complex as the world watches closely.

As Russia seemingly casts its vote of confidence for Harris, all eyes are now on how the American electorate will respond to the escalating U.S.-Russia tensions and the political narratives swirling ahead of November 5. One thing is clear: the road to the White House just got a lot more unpredictable.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts

Our News Portal

We provide accurate, balanced, and impartial coverage of national and international affairs, focusing on the activities and developments within the parliament and its surrounding political landscape. We aim to foster informed public discourse and promote transparency in governance through our news articles, features, and opinion pieces.

Newsletter

Laest News

@2023 – All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by The Parliament News

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
-
00:00
00:00
Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00