Home Tags Posts tagged with "Tariff"
Tag:

Tariff

The United States has signalled a possible diplomatic pathway to remove the additional 25% tariffs imposed on India, following a sharp decline in Indian refinery purchases of Russian oil. The indication came from U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent during the World Economic Forum in Davos.

Speaking to Politico, Bessent said India’s imports of Russian crude by its refineries have “collapsed” after Washington imposed the tariff, calling the outcome a “huge success” for U.S. policy. While the tariffs remain in place for now, he suggested that conditions exist under which they could be lifted.

“We put a 25 per cent tariff on India for buying Russian oil, and the Indian purchases by their refineries of Russian oil have collapsed. So that is a success. The tariffs are still on. I would imagine there is a path to take them off,” Bessent said.

The remarks come amid heightened geopolitical tension over energy security, sanctions on Russia, and global trade realignments. India has repeatedly defended its energy strategy, stressing the need to ensure affordable fuel for its population of over 1.4 billion people.

New Delhi has also acknowledged a proposed bipartisan bill in the U.S. Congress that could impose duties of up to 500% on countries purchasing Russian oil. Reacting to the development, Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said India is closely monitoring the situation.

Bessent further criticised European nations for purchasing refined petroleum products from India that originate from discounted Russian crude, accusing them of indirectly financing the war in Ukraine. He described Europe’s stance as “ironic,” arguing that while the EU avoided similar tariffs on India, it continues to buy refined products made from Russian oil.

The comments come as India and the European Union prepare for the 16th India-EU Summit in New Delhi, where a comprehensive strategic agenda and a long-pending Free Trade Agreement are expected to be finalised. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has described the FTA as “the mother of all deals,” potentially creating a market of nearly 2 billion people and covering about a quarter of global GDP.

As global trade faces disruption due to Washington’s tariff policies, India continues to balance strategic autonomy, energy security, and evolving partnerships with both the U.S. and the EU.

Short Summary

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has hinted at a possible removal of the 25% tariffs on India, saying Indian refinery purchases of Russian oil have sharply declined, calling the tariff policy a “huge success” while leaving room for diplomacy.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Article

US President Donald Trump has once again defended the use of tariffs as a central economic policy tool, arguing that import duties help the government raise revenue, protect domestic industries, and encourage consumers to buy American-made products. However, economic data and independent studies suggest that the burden of tariffs largely falls on US consumers and businesses, rather than foreign exporters.

The latest dispute follows Trump’s warning that the United States will impose 10 per cent tariffs from February 1, rising to 25 per cent by June 1, on imports from Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Finland, unless these countries support his proposal for the US to acquire Greenland. The tariffs would remain in place until what Trump described as a “complete and total purchase” is agreed upon.

Trump has justified the move by calling Greenland “vital to US national security” and citing concerns over European activity in the Arctic region.

Trump’s Case for Tariffs

Trump has consistently argued that tariffs:

increase government revenue,

reduce the US trade deficit,

push consumers toward domestically manufactured goods, and

encourage companies to invest and produce within the United States.

He has framed trade deficits as evidence that the US is being economically disadvantaged by foreign countries and has repeatedly claimed that tariffs can restore manufacturing jobs and industrial capacity.

Rising Costs for Consumers

Evidence from recent years suggests that tariffs tend to raise prices for American consumers. According to the BBC, US inflation rose to 3 per cent in the year ending September, up from 2.4 per cent in April, before easing to 2.7 per cent in November and December.

Several major retailers, including Target, Walmart, and Adidas, have indicated that higher import costs resulting from tariffs are passed on to consumers through price increases.

Industries that rely on global supply chains are particularly affected. In the automobile sector, parts frequently cross US, Mexican, and Canadian borders multiple times during production, meaning tariffs increase costs at several stages of manufacturing.

Who Really Pays?

A study by the Kiel Institute for the World Economy found that around 96 per cent of tariff costs are borne by US buyers, including households and businesses, while only about 4 per cent is absorbed by foreign exporters through lower prices. This makes tariffs function similarly to a consumption tax.

Earlier analyses by institutions such as Goldman Sachs showed that while US firms initially absorbed some tariff costs, these expenses were increasingly passed on to consumers over time.

Various estimates suggest that tariffs have acted like a tax increase of roughly $1,100–$1,500 per household per year, with a US Congressional report estimating the 2025 cost at around $1,200 per family.

Impact on Trade and Jobs

Trump has claimed that tariffs would reduce the US trade deficit. However, during the earlier trade war, the US trade deficit with China widened from about $375 billion in 2017 to $419 billion in 2018, before declining modestly in 2019. Economists note that tariffs often redirect trade flows rather than reducing overall deficits.

Employment data also shows limited benefits. While some protected sectors such as steel and aluminium saw modest job gains, overall manufacturing job growth remained weak. In several industries, higher input costs led to job losses instead of gains.

Research from the Federal Reserve and the International Monetary Fund indicates that tariffs weighed on GDP growth and investment. Estimates cited by The Independent suggest the trade war reduced US economic output by $40–$60 billion annually.

A Mixed Economic Record

While tariffs have provided targeted protection for certain industries, broader data suggests they have increased costs for consumers, strained supply chains, and delivered limited gains in employment and trade balances. Economists widely agree that tariffs alone are unlikely to achieve long-term economic objectives without broader structural reforms.

Short Summary

Donald Trump argues that tariffs boost US revenue, protect domestic industries, and reduce trade deficits. However, studies show that most tariff costs are passed on to American consumers, raising prices, increasing household expenses, and delivering limited gains in manufacturing jobs or trade balances.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

India encountered renewed diplomatic and economic pressure on January 8, 2026, following two major policy decisions announced by US President Donald Trump. The first involves Washington backing a sweeping sanctions Bill that proposes punitive tariffs of up to 500% on countries purchasing Russian oil. The second is the United States’ decision to withdraw from the India-led International Solar Alliance, a move that has wider implications for global climate cooperation.

Together, the announcements have placed India in a difficult position, balancing energy security, strategic autonomy, and its relationship with the United States.

At the heart of the pressure lies the Russia Sanctions Act, a bipartisan Bill with overwhelming support in the US Congress. The legislation empowers the US President to impose severe secondary tariffs on countries that continue to buy or resell Russian oil.

President Trump has publicly endorsed the Bill, describing it as a powerful tool to curb Russia’s war financing. Senior lawmakers backing the proposal have explicitly named India, alongside China and Brazil, as key targets of the sanctions framework.

With the Bill expected to come up for a vote soon, the threat of sharply higher tariffs has become increasingly real.

The timing of the announcements is significant. US Ambassador-designate Sergio Gor is scheduled to arrive in New Delhi on January 12, beginning his tenure as Ambassador and Special Envoy to South and Central Asia.

Mr. Gor has previously stated that ensuring India ends its purchases of Russian oil is among Washington’s top priorities. His arrival is widely seen as the beginning of a renewed diplomatic push to secure a complete halt to Indian imports of Russian crude.

There are indications that India has already begun adjusting its energy sourcing. Reliance Industries recently confirmed that it did not receive Russian oil cargoes at its Jamnagar refinery for much of December and does not expect deliveries in January.

While Indian public sector oil companies briefly increased imports in late 2025, constraints on other major buyers and growing external pressure suggest that Russian oil imports are unlikely to return to earlier levels.

India has faced similar situations before. During earlier US sanctions regimes, New Delhi had entirely phased out oil imports from Iran and Venezuela, demonstrating its ability to recalibrate under sustained pressure.

India’s evolving stance has drawn cautious approval from parts of Europe. During diplomatic engagements in Paris, senior European leaders publicly welcomed the reduction in India’s Russian oil imports, framing it as a step toward limiting Moscow’s war financing.

Notably, these remarks went unchallenged by Indian officials present, suggesting an awareness of the broader geopolitical expectations surrounding energy trade.

Adding to the strain, the United States announced its withdrawal from the International Solar Alliance, an organisation founded by India and France and headquartered in New Delhi. The alliance, with over 90 member countries, was created to accelerate global adoption of solar energy.

When the US joined the alliance in 2021, it was widely seen as a validation of India’s leadership in renewable energy diplomacy. Its exit, along with withdrawal from multiple climate-related international bodies, is now being viewed as a setback for multilateral climate action.

The US decision has sparked concern among climate advocates and policymakers alike. Walking away from global renewable platforms weakens collective efforts to address climate change and undermines confidence in international cooperation.

For India, which has positioned itself as a champion of clean energy and climate partnerships, the move complicates efforts to maintain momentum in global solar initiatives.

India now finds itself at the intersection of competing pressures: safeguarding affordable energy supplies, managing geopolitical alignments, and preserving leadership in renewable energy diplomacy.

How New Delhi responds in the coming weeks particularly during high-level engagements with the new US Ambassador will shape not just its energy policy, but its broader strategic positioning in an increasingly fragmented global order.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Donald trump

In a notable departure from his earlier tariff-heavy trade strategy, US President Donald Trump has rolled back duties on a wide range of imported agricultural and processed-food items. The decision, effective from November 13, eliminates a 50% reciprocal tariff on hundreds of goods—many of which form part of India’s export basket.

This comes as the administration faces rising criticism over consumer prices and pressure to stabilise the domestic food market.

What Triggered the Change?

The revised exemption list—released as Annexure II—reflects what Trump called “additional information and recommendations” from trade and economic advisors. In his executive order, the president stated that certain agricultural products should no longer fall under the earlier tariff regime, marking a clear softening of a policy that once defined his trade stance.

The update covers 254 new items, including 229 agricultural products, representing over $1 billion of India’s exports to the US.

A Boost for India’s Agri Exporters

India’s agricultural shipments to the US are valued at roughly $5.7 billion annually. Although the newly exempted products form a smaller chunk of that total, the strategic importance is far greater than the numbers suggest.

Key Products Now at Zero Duty

  • Fruits and nuts: mangoes, guavas, coconuts, cashews, bananas, pineapples, areca nuts
  • Tea and coffee: all 12 categories exported by India
  • Spices: nearly all varieties except thyme, totaling $358.66 million in export value
  • Processed foods: juices, cocoa preparations, fruit pulps, coffee extracts, vegetable waxes
  • Essential oils: now newly classified and allowed with zero-duty access

These categories align with India’s strong global export performance, particularly in high-value, labour-intensive agricultural segments.

Why This Matters for India’s Farmers

Trade experts note that while the dollar figures may not appear headline-grabbing, the real impact lies in the agricultural value chain, where millions of workers depend on steady demand.

Removing duties:

  • Makes Indian products more competitive
  • Levels the playing field with other suppliers
  • Encourages value-added production rather than raw commodity exports
  • Supports small growers, farmer cooperatives, and processing units

With established supply networks and deep diaspora-linked demand, India is positioned to scale quickly.

Domestic Politics Behind the Tariff Retreat

The move is also tied to America’s domestic economic mood. Voters in several states expressed frustration over rising prices during recent off-year elections, leading to significant Democratic victories. Trump acknowledged that tariffs “may, in some cases” push consumer prices up—an unusual admission from a leader who has long defended them as cost-free.

Record-high beef prices, influenced partly by tariffs on Brazil, created additional political pressure.

Speaking aboard Air Force One, Trump described the rollback as “a little bit of a rollback on some foods like coffee,” but the implications are far larger.

What Happens Next?

The tariff reversal could reset trade dynamics between India and the United States, opening opportunities for long-term collaboration in food supply chains, specialty foods, and processed agricultural goods. For US consumers, the change may ease inflationary pressures on premium food categories.

For India, it represents both economic potential and validation of its reputation as a reliable agricultural supplier.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
US Tariffs

As global trade tensions intensify, the United States has identified India as a strategic ally in its escalating confrontation with China over rare earth exports—the critical minerals that power everything from electric vehicles to defense technologies. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent took aim at Beijing, accusing China of “weaponizing supply chains” by imposing export controls on these crucial minerals.

“This is China versus the world,” Bessent declared in a recent interview, emphasizing Washington’s intent to rally global democracies—including India and key European partners—to safeguard industrial autonomy from Beijing’s influence.

In a strongly worded statement to Fox Business, Bessent accused China of threatening the foundation of global industry: “They’ve pointed a bazooka at the supply chains and the industrial base of the entire free world. And we’re not going to have it.”

The U.S. Treasury chief added that America would assert its sovereignty “in various ways,” signaling a tougher trade posture and expanded coordination with allies. Bessent’s language underscores a sharp escalation in rhetoric, reflecting Washington’s frustration over what it sees as Beijing’s attempt to dominate the world’s rare earth market.

Trump’s Tariffs Deepen the Divide

The renewed tensions follow former President Donald Trump’s announcement of 100% tariffs on Chinese imports, a retaliatory response to China’s latest export restrictions. Trump’s move triggered alarm across global markets and rekindled fears of a full-blown U.S.-China trade war, just when relations appeared to be stabilizing.

Trump, while reiterating that he “wants to help China, not hurt it,” accused Beijing of “exporting its way out of a depression” and warned that the U.S. would no longer tolerate unfair trade practices. His administration is also reviewing a planned meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping at the upcoming APEC Summit, hinting that diplomatic dialogue could take a back seat to economic confrontation.

India’s Balancing Act Between Two Superpowers

Caught between Washington’s expectations and Beijing’s sensitivities, India now finds itself at the center of this unfolding global trade chessboard. While the U.S. sees India as a vital partner in countering China’s dominance over rare earth minerals, New Delhi remains cautious.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s recent outreach to Beijing, aimed at stabilizing ties after years of tension along the border, highlights India’s delicate position. Despite this, Bessent’s remarks indicate that Washington expects India’s participation in securing critical mineral supply chains, positioning it as a cornerstone in the emerging “China vs the World” trade dynamic.

Signals From Washington to New Delhi

Even as Trump lauds Modi as a “great leader” and a “good friend,” India continues to face 50% U.S. tariffs, complicating the path to deeper cooperation. The contradictory stance—praise alongside pressure—mirrors the volatile nature of Trump-era diplomacy, where trade protectionism and strategic alliances coexist uneasily.

At the Gaza Peace Summit in Egypt, Trump’s praise for Pakistan raised eyebrows in New Delhi, though he later balanced it with warm words for Modi. This back-and-forth underscores the unpredictable rhythm of U.S.-India relations under Trump’s renewed leadership.

The Trade Deal Still on the Table

Despite the turbulence, Delhi and Washington are pushing ahead with negotiations on a long-discussed Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA). Five rounds of talks have already taken place, with another scheduled this week as Indian officials head to the U.S.

A senior Indian negotiator confirmed that the first phase of the deal is expected by late 2025, though progress has been slow due to repeated tariff disruptions. Both sides remain optimistic that the agreement could reset trade dynamics and shield future cooperation from political headwinds.

Global Stakes: The Rare Earths Power Play

China remains the world’s dominant producer of rare earth elements, controlling over 70% of global output. Its recent export restrictions have already sparked price spikes and supply fears in sectors such as defense, electronics, and renewable energy.

For the U.S. and its allies, building an **alternative supply chain network—with India as a critical hub—**is now both an economic and strategic imperative. As Bessent put it, this is no longer about trade alone but about “protecting the free world’s industrial future.”

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Stock Market

Small-Cap Selloff Deepens Amid Tariff Tensions and Market Volatility

The Indian equity market closed the week on a cautious note as persistent US tariff concerns and sustained foreign investor selling dragged indices lower. The BSE Small-cap index slipped nearly 2%, with more than 40 counters recording double-digit declines ranging from 10% to 24%.

Heavy losses were seen in PG Electroplast, Kitex Garments, Unichem Laboratories, Morepen Laboratories, Advait Energy Transitions, KR Rail Engineering, Faze Three, and Advanced Enzyme Technologies. The selloff marked the third straight week of weakness in broader markets, underlining the fragility of investor confidence.

Broader Indices Remain Under Pressure

For the week, the BSE Sensex dropped 742.12 points or 0.92% to settle at 79,857.79, while the Nifty50 fell 202.05 points or 0.82% to close at 24,363.30. Large-cap and mid-cap indices each shed about 1%, trailing their small-cap counterparts’ sharper declines.

Sectoral performance was mixed, with Nifty Pharma, Realty, FMCG, and Healthcare losing around 2% each. In contrast, PSU Bank, media, and metal stocks managed modest gains of 0.5% to 1.5%.

FII Selling Continues, DIIs Offer Support

Foreign Institutional Investors extended their selling streak into a sixth consecutive week, offloading equities worth ₹10,652.47 crore during the week. So far in August, FIIs have sold shares worth ₹14,018.87 crore.

On the other side, Domestic Institutional Investors remained steady buyers for the 16th straight week, purchasing equities worth ₹33,608.66 crore during the week and ₹36,795.52 crore so far this month. This consistent domestic inflow provided some cushion against steeper market losses.

Global Trade Tensions Cloud Outlook

Vinod Nair, Head of Research at Geojit Financial Services, noted that the market’s consolidation since July reflects the drag from trade-related challenges and underwhelming earnings. “Persistent FII selling, particularly in pharma stocks with significant US exposure, highlights the cautious sentiment. The rupee’s depreciation has also added to the pressure,” he said.

Nair added that optimism from the RBI’s reaffirmation of macroeconomic stability and easing inflation trends has softened the downside, but risks from global trade frictions and sustained foreign outflows remain elevated.

Winners Amid the Weakness

While the broader tone was negative, a handful of stocks bucked the trend. Sarda Energy and Minerals, Timex Group India, Sanghvi Movers, Zinka Logistics Solutions, Centum Electronics, KRBL, Baazar Style Retail, Godfrey Phillips India, and Entertainment Network India posted gains of 12% to 21%, reflecting selective buying in niche segments.

Looking Ahead

The market’s near-term direction will hinge on upcoming inflation data from India and the US, alongside any fresh developments in global trade relations. Analysts suggest investors focus on domestic consumption-driven sectors, which may be better equipped to ride out short-term volatility.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

A ripple of optimism spread across global financial markets on Tuesday after reports suggested the United States plans to ease its hardline stance on auto tariffs. Investors welcomed news that the White House, under Donald Trump’s direction, will reportedly exempt automakers—already subject to 25% tariffs—from any further levies, aiming to prevent overlapping penalties that could stifle industry growth.

A Softer Trade Stance Sparks Confidence

The development, first reported by the Wall Street Journal, has been perceived as a key shift in tone from the Trump administration. Markets have responded in kind, buoyed by the prospect of trade negotiations rather than a fresh round of escalation.

“On tariffs, the latest newsflow was actually fairly positive at face value,” said Jim Reid, managing director at Deutsche Bank. “US officials continued to sound optimistic about potential trade deals. The rhetoric from the administration is still pointing towards negotiations.”

This apparent pivot has encouraged several countries to re-enter trade talks with Washington, seeking exemptions from the full brunt of wide-ranging US tariffs—particularly those impacting steel and aluminium.

Market Snapshot: Europe and Asia in the Green

European indices moved cautiously higher in response to the easing trade sentiment and a busy earnings season. Frankfurt’s DAX climbed 0.5 percent, supported by investor-friendly company updates. London’s FTSE 100 edged up 0.1 percent, while Paris’s CAC 40 slipped 0.3 percent under pressure from weaker earnings results.

Across Asia, the reaction was more measured. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index added 0.2 percent, while Shanghai’s Composite Index dipped 0.1 percent as investors digested mixed signals from ongoing US-China negotiations. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNBC that discussions were ongoing but emphasized that the next move rests with Beijing.

Seoul gained ground, lifted by the positive impact of tariff relief news on major South Korean automakers Hyundai and Kia. Tokyo remained closed due to a public holiday.

Wall Street Awaits Tech Earnings, Economic Indicators

Investors in New York held a cautious but positive stance ahead of key earnings reports from tech giants including Amazon, Apple, Meta, and Microsoft. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose by 0.3 percent to close at 40,227.59.

Attention is also turning to upcoming economic indicators, particularly data on US job creation and inflation—critical figures in determining whether trade-related uncertainty could spill over into consumer prices.

Corporate Winners and Losers

Despite the broader upbeat tone, some corporate results disappointed. French firm Schneider Electric shed nearly 8 percent in Paris after falling short of earnings expectations. London-listed BP and Associated British Foods both missed estimates, with shares sliding over three and six percent respectively. AstraZeneca also declined, losing more than three percent despite a rise in first-quarter profits.

Oil Prices Slide Amid Trade Concerns

Oil prices retreated further on Tuesday, with Brent crude down 1.7 percent to $63.66 per barrel and West Texas Intermediate falling 1.8 percent to $60.95. Fears that prolonged trade tensions may curb global demand weighed heavily on investor sentiment in the energy market.

Currency Markets Hold Mixed Signals

In the currency space, the euro weakened slightly against the dollar, trading at $1.1377. The British pound also declined, reflecting modest volatility in the wake of Canada’s election results, where Prime Minister Mark Carney’s Liberal Party secured a win. The yen edged lower, with the dollar strengthening to 142.71 yen.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

In a world grappling with unpredictable geopolitical shifts, the latest chapter in global economic diplomacy has unfolded with an unmistakable clang of metal—tariffs. US President Donald Trump’s sharp escalation of trade duties has triggered distinct responses from global powerhouses, each crafting its own path amid rising uncertainty. From China’s fierce pushback to Japan’s conciliatory tone, the globe is witnessing a range of tactical manoeuvres.


China: The Iron-Willed Resistor

China has chosen not to blink. In response to Trump’s recent threat of an additional 50 per cent tariff on Chinese imports—stacked atop an already burdensome 34 per cent tariff—Beijing has doubled down. The Commerce Ministry’s statement was unambiguous: “resolute opposition” and countermeasures will be the course ahead.

This tit-for-tat stance has triggered deep tremors in Chinese markets. The Hang Seng Index tumbled, marking its steepest fall in nearly three decades. With a tariff avalanche looming—cumulatively more than doubling import costs of Chinese goods in the US—China’s resilience will be tested. But unlike the US, China’s leadership isn’t burdened by electoral cycles. President Xi Jinping enjoys a consolidation of power, a solid economic buffer in the form of fiscal and monetary stimulus, and a long-term plan to shift China’s growth story toward internal consumption.


Japan: The Negotiator in the Room

On the opposite end of the response spectrum is Japan. Instead of retaliating, Tokyo is preparing to talk. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has already engaged with President Trump and is dispatching a delegation for negotiations with key American trade officials. This strategic move signals Japan’s preference for diplomacy over defiance.

The move seems to have sparked optimism in the markets. Tokyo’s Nikkei 225 surged over six per cent, and the Topix jumped nearly seven per cent, with a ripple effect felt across other Asian markets. Investors seem to believe that Japan might crack the code and coax Washington into a less aggressive stance, which could potentially offer a blueprint for other nations navigating similar waters.


European Union: Walking the Tightrope

Caught between confrontation and compromise, the European Union appears to be weighing its steps carefully. Trade ministers from the 27-member bloc convened in Luxembourg and walked out with a dual-strategy blueprint. While negotiations remain the preferred path, preparations for retaliatory measures are underway—just in case Washington chooses to escalate.

Given the sheer scale of the EU-US trade relationship, which accounts for approximately €1.5 trillion, Brussels cannot afford to act hastily. The aim is to avoid a trade war while ensuring Europe does not appear passive in the face of economic aggression. Intriguingly, this approach has found an unlikely ally in Elon Musk, who has publicly backed negotiation as the wiser route forward.


India: Strategic Silence and Subtle Signals

India, for its part, has responded with caution. While the initial reaction was muted, signalling a period of internal assessment, informal conversations within government corridors hint at a preference for quiet diplomacy over aggressive countermeasures. This is a notable shift from the previous Trump era, when India had responded to American tariffs on steel and aluminium with reciprocal levies.

For now, individual ministries have played down the likely impact of the new tariff regime, perhaps signalling a wait-and-watch approach. However, India’s position could evolve depending on how the global trade chessboard rearranges itself in the coming weeks.


The US: On the Edge of Economic and Political Complexity

Ironically, the initiator of this tariff spiral may have fewer economic tools at hand to withstand it. With limited room for fiscal expansion—save an extension of previous tax cuts—Washington is also at loggerheads with the Federal Reserve, which is showing no signs of slashing interest rates to support the economy. That tension, combined with an election horizon looming for Trump, could constrict America’s ability to endure a prolonged trade standoff.


A Test of Strategy, Stamina, and Statecraft

As the world grapples with President Trump’s combative trade approach, what’s emerging is not a uniform global backlash but a diverse set of responses. China is fighting fire with fire. Japan is offering an olive branch. The EU is hedging its bets. India is treading cautiously. In this high-stakes diplomatic game, success may not be determined by who retaliates hardest—but by who adapts fastest.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Our News Portal

We provide accurate, balanced, and impartial coverage of national and international affairs, focusing on the activities and developments within the parliament and its surrounding political landscape. We aim to foster informed public discourse and promote transparency in governance through our news articles, features, and opinion pieces.

Newsletter

Laest News

@2023 – All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by The Parliament News

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
-
00:00
00:00
Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00