LOGIN
Thursday, February 19, 2026
Top Posts
SUBSCRIBE NEWSLETTERS
Home Tags Posts tagged with "World news"
Tag:

World news

BlogFeaturedWorld

US Expands Naval Presence Amid Rising Tensions With Iran

by theparliamentnews.com
written by theparliamentnews.com

The United States is increasing its military presence in the Middle East amid reports that officials are preparing contingency plans for potential extended operations against Iran. According to a Reuters report citing two U.S. officials, military planners have outlined options for operations that could last several weeks if authorised by President Donald Trump. No final decision on military action has been announced. This increased focus underscores the strategic importance of the US in the region.

The Pentagon has ordered the redeployment of the USS Gerald R. Ford, a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, from the Caribbean to the Middle East. It is expected to join the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group already operating in the region. The move places two U.S. carrier strike groups within operational range of Iran, significantly increasing American air and naval capabilities, further establishing the role of the US in the strategic landscape.

This maneuver highlights the commitment of the US to maintain stability and deter threats in the area, reinforcing its pivotal role in regional security.

Growing Military Posture

Carrier strike groups typically include guided-missile destroyers, cruisers, fighter aircraft and logistical support vessels. The addition of a second carrier enhances surveillance capacity, air strike capability and layered defence systems.

The redeployment of the USS Gerald R. Ford follows its earlier assignment in the Caribbean, where it was part of operations connected to U.S. security objectives in the Western Hemisphere. Its shift to the Middle East signals a change in strategic focus amid heightened tensions with Tehran.

Officials cited in the Reuters report indicated that preparations involve planning for sustained operations rather than limited, single-target strikes. However, they did not confirm that any operation had been authorised.

Diplomatic Engagement Continues

Despite the military buildup, diplomatic channels remain active. U.S. and Iranian representatives recently held discussions in Oman aimed at exploring the possibility of renewed negotiations concerning Iran’s nuclear programme.

The talks are viewed as exploratory and intended to assess whether progress toward a broader agreement is possible. Differences remain over Iran’s ballistic missile programme and regional activities, which have long been sources of tension between Washington and Tehran.

When asked about reports of potential extended military operations, White House spokesperson Anna Kelly stated that the President considers a range of perspectives before making decisions related to national security.

Strategic Context

Tensions between the United States and Iran have fluctuated over recent years, often centering on Iran’s nuclear activities and missile development. Washington maintains that preventing Tehran from acquiring a nuclear weapon remains a core strategic objective.

The presence of two carrier strike groups is relatively uncommon and typically reflects heightened readiness. Dual-carrier deployments provide expanded operational flexibility, faster response times and increased strike capacity if required.

Defence analysts note that such deployments can serve multiple purposes: deterrence, reassurance of regional allies and preparation for contingency operations. At the same time, large-scale force movements may raise concerns about escalation.

Balancing Pressure and Negotiation

President Trump has maintained a firm public stance toward Iran, stating that all options remain under consideration. His administration has combined diplomatic engagement with visible military readiness.

Officials have emphasised that planning for potential operations does not equate to a decision to initiate conflict. Military contingency planning is a routine part of defence strategy, particularly in regions with longstanding geopolitical tensions.

Any sustained military campaign would likely have broader regional implications, including potential retaliatory actions and economic consequences affecting global energy markets.

Current Status

At present:

  • No military strike has been formally announced.
  • Diplomatic discussions are ongoing.
  • U.S. forces in the region have increased in strength and readiness.

The situation remains fluid, with developments likely to depend on both diplomatic progress and strategic assessments in Washington.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
BlogFeaturedWorld

Clashes Erupt at Milan Anti-Olympics Protest Amid Rail Sabotage Fears

by theparliamentnews.com
written by theparliamentnews.com
Milan anti-Olympics protest

A protest against the Winter Olympics in Milan turned violent on Saturday evening after hours of largely peaceful demonstrations, as Italian authorities simultaneously investigated a series of suspicious incidents on railway lines in northern Italy that officials fear may amount to coordinated sabotage.

The protest began in the afternoon with demonstrators marching peacefully through Milan, holding signs, chanting slogans, and moving arm-in-arm. The march was organised by the Unsustainable Olympics Committee, an activist group opposing the 2026 Winter Olympics, and drew participants from Milan, the Lombardy region, and other parts of northern Italy.

Protesters voiced opposition to the environmental impact of Olympic infrastructure projects and criticised what they described as the economic and social consequences of hosting the Games. The organisers brought together a broad coalition of grassroots sports organisations, civic and environmental movements, student groups, housing activists, trade unions, pro-Palestinian networks, and transfeminist collectives.

Demonstrators also raised broader concerns about what they described as an “authoritarian security drift” by the Italian government and its treatment of racial minorities.

Escalation near Olympic sites

The march set off from Piazza Medaglie d’Oro and proceeded toward areas near the Olympic Village, which was secured by a large police cordon. As protesters passed close to the athletes’ housing, some individuals threw firecrackers and smoke bombs in the direction of the site. Authorities said the objects could not reach the buildings due to distance and security measures.

Tensions escalated after the march diverted onto Via Benaco and reached Piazzale Corvetto. A smaller group of protesters began throwing fireworks at police officers, prompting a police charge. Protesters later targeted police vans with additional fireworks.

Police responded by deploying water cannons and tear gas to disperse the crowd. Officials noted that not all demonstrators participated in the clashes, with many remaining in the main area of the square and not engaging in violence.

No immediate reports of serious injuries were released by authorities.

Olympic opening held amid unrest

The unrest came one day after the official opening of the 2026 Winter Olympics, which was marked by a high-profile ceremony at Milan’s San Siro stadium. The event celebrated Italy’s art and cultural heritage and featured performances by Italian tenor Andrea Bocelli and American singer Mariah Carey.

Security across Olympic venues has been heightened as Italy hosts the Games, with officials emphasising the need to ensure the safety of athletes, spectators, and infrastructure.

Railway incidents under investigation

Separately from the Milan protest, authorities are investigating a series of incidents affecting railway infrastructure in northern Italy, raising concerns about possible coordinated sabotage.

In Bologna, railway services were severely disrupted on Saturday after three separate incidents of damage were discovered. According to Italy’s rail network operator Ferrovie dello Stato and the Ansa news agency, investigators found a rudimentary explosive device placed on a switch along the Bologna-Padova line.

In addition, electrical cables were cut on a high-speed railway line, while a fire was reported at an electrical cabin in the Adriatic coastal town of Pesaro.

Italy’s transport minister said the incidents appeared to be a “premeditated attack” on the railway network. Investigators have not ruled out the involvement of anarchist groups, citing similarities to acts of sabotage carried out on French rail lines during the 2024 Paris Olympics, when high-speed train services were targeted by arson and other malicious acts.

Speaking from Bormio, where he was attending the men’s downhill ski race, Infrastructure and Transport Minister Matteo Salvini condemned the incidents, describing them as an “act of delinquency.”

Authorities have not officially linked the railway incidents to the Milan protest, but investigations are ongoing as security services assess potential threats linked to the Olympic Games.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
BlogFeaturedWorld

Iran Protests Spread Nationwide as Economy Pushes Public to the Brink

by theparliamentnews.com
written by theparliamentnews.com
Iran Protests

Iran has entered a period of deep unrest, with protests stretching across the country for nearly two weeks and posing the most serious challenge to the ruling establishment in years. What began as economic frustration has grown into a broader expression of public anger, cutting across cities, campuses, and social groups.

Demonstrations have now been reported in roughly 180 cities across all provinces, signalling a level of geographic spread rarely seen in recent years. Protesters have taken to streets, universities, and marketplaces, voicing grievances that go far beyond prices and wages.

Economic Pressure at the Heart of the Protests

The initial spark came from Iran’s worsening economic conditions. Inflation has surged, the national currency has sharply weakened, and basic goods have become unaffordable for many households. Shopkeepers in Tehran were among the first to strike, an unusual development given their traditional alignment with the political establishment.

As the protests gained momentum, the focus widened. Demonstrators began targeting governance failures, corruption, and long-standing political restrictions, transforming an economic protest into a national political moment.

Government Response and Escalating Tensions

Iranian authorities have responded with a heavy security presence. Thousands have reportedly been detained, including minors, and dozens of deaths have been recorded amid clashes between protesters and security forces. Officials have acknowledged injuries among police and paramilitary personnel.

A nationwide internet shutdown has further heightened tensions, cutting off communication channels used by protesters and journalists. Even satellite-based services, which had previously provided limited connectivity, appear to have been disrupted.

Trump’s Warnings Add an International Dimension

US President Donald Trump has publicly warned Iranian authorities against using lethal force, stating that the United States would respond strongly if protesters were killed. While ruling out ground intervention, he has suggested punitive measures that would target Iran’s vulnerabilities.

Trump’s remarks follow a period of increasingly assertive US foreign policy actions, and his comments have injected global attention into Iran’s internal crisis. Analysts believe these statements may embolden protesters while simultaneously restraining the government’s response.

Tehran Pushes Back, Blames External Forces

Iran’s leadership has rejected accusations of repression, instead blaming foreign interference for the unrest. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei accused outside powers of exploiting economic grievances to destabilise the country, while officials have condemned US statements as provocative.

At the same time, the government has attempted limited outreach, acknowledging economic hardship and offering modest financial relief. Critics argue these steps fall far short of addressing structural economic failures.

Iran has experienced waves of mass protests before, most notably in 2009, 2019, and 2022. However, observers note a key difference this time: the protests are rooted in economic survival rather than a single social or political trigger.

The unrest has reached smaller cities that historically remained quiet, suggesting a deeper level of desperation. Analysts warn that economic-driven movements are harder to defuse, as there are fewer immediate concessions the government can realistically offer.

Iran’s exiled Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi has publicly encouraged protesters to maintain discipline and scale, calling for coordinated nationwide actions. His involvement has drawn mixed reactions but has undeniably added momentum to the movement.

Whether the protests can sustain themselves remains uncertain. Much will depend on the response of security forces, the resilience of protesters, and the regime’s ability to manage a crisis rooted in economic collapse rather than ideology.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
BlogFeaturedWorld

Trump Pushes Last-Chance Gaza Agreement Amid Rising Tensions

by theparliamentnews.com
written by theparliamentnews.com
Trump announces Gaza ultimatum deadline.

In a dramatic move, US President Donald Trump has given Hamas until Sunday, 6 PM Washington DC time to accept his newly unveiled Gaza peace plan. Failure to comply, Trump warned, would unleash “all hell, like no one has ever seen before” against the Palestinian group.

The ultimatum marks the most direct and forceful stance Trump has taken since presenting his peace framework earlier this week alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The plan seeks to end nearly two years of conflict in Gaza, though Hamas has not yet formally agreed to its terms.

The Key Elements of Trump’s Gaza Peace Plan

The proposed deal outlines several critical steps intended to restore peace and stability in the region:

  • Immediate Ceasefire: Both parties must halt all hostilities.
  • Hostage Release: All hostages are to be freed within 72 hours.
  • Disarmament of Hamas: The group would be required to give up its weapons.
  • Phased Israeli Withdrawal: Israel would gradually pull back forces from Gaza under international oversight.
  • Post-War Authority: Trump himself has proposed leading an interim post-war governance structure to ensure compliance and stability.

Trump’s Warning to Hamas

Trump’s language was uncharacteristically blunt, signaling a zero-tolerance approach. On Truth Social, he wrote:
“Every Country has signed on! If this LAST CHANCE agreement is not reached, all HELL, like no one has ever seen before, will break out against Hamas. THERE WILL BE PEACE IN THE MIDDLE EAST ONE WAY OR THE OTHER.”

He further threatened that Hamas fighters are “surrounded and militarily trapped” and would be eliminated should they reject the plan. “As for the rest,” Trump added, “we know where and who you are, and you will be hunted down, and killed.”

Hamas’s Initial Response

While Hamas has yet to issue a final statement, leaders acknowledged on Friday that the deal contains “points of concern.” Mohammad Nazzal, a senior member of Hamas’s political bureau, indicated that the group will soon announce its official position.

Earlier in the week, Hamas had requested time to study the proposal, with Trump saying they would have “three or four days” to respond. The Sunday deadline now adds urgency and heightens tensions.

A Region on Edge

The ultimatum comes at a fragile moment for the Middle East. With multiple nations backing the plan, Trump has framed it as a near-universal solution to end ongoing hostilities. However, the hardline approach raises questions about whether Hamas will engage in negotiations or resist the mounting international pressure.

Observers warn that failure to reach an agreement by the deadline could escalate violence further, potentially dragging the region into an even bloodier chapter.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
BlogFeaturedWorld

Iran sanctions return as UN rejects Russian and Chinese proposal

by theparliamentnews.com
written by theparliamentnews.com
United Nations

UN Security Council Blocks Delay on Iran Sanctions

A last-minute bid to stall the return of UN sanctions on Iran has failed after the Security Council rejected a resolution put forth by Russia and China. The vote, held on September 26, 2025, came just a day before the deadline, ensuring that the penalties will return under the terms of Iran’s 2015 nuclear agreement with world powers.

What the Snapback Sanctions Mean

The sanctions, expected to take effect on Saturday, will freeze Iranian assets abroad, ban arms deals with Tehran, and restrict development of Iran’s ballistic missile program. These measures, revived by Britain, France, and Germany, are designed to pressure Iran back into compliance with its nuclear commitments. For an economy already struggling under inflation and sanctions, the reimposition marks another setback.

Diplomatic Stalemate Despite Weeks of Talks

European nations and Iran’s foreign minister engaged in multiple rounds of negotiations in recent weeks, but officials admitted the talks produced no progress. The E3 nations accused Iran of failing to meet the accord’s terms, while Iranian leaders countered that they had offered “multiple proposals” to keep diplomacy alive. Statements from Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, rejecting talks with the US as “a sheer dead end” further limited any chances of compromise.

Russia and China’s Position

Russia and China, joined by Pakistan and Algeria, backed extending the deadline to allow more time for diplomacy. Moscow criticized Western nations for choosing “blackmail over dialogue,” warning that escalating tensions could destabilize the region further. However, their resolution fell short of the nine votes needed for approval.

The Nuclear Question and Inspections

At the center of the dispute is Iran’s enrichment of uranium to 60%, a level just short of weapons-grade material. While Iran insists its program is peaceful, Western nations view the enrichment as a dangerous step toward weaponization. Despite a recent agreement with the UN nuclear watchdog, inspectors’ access remains partial, and Iran has threatened to cut cooperation entirely if sanctions are enforced.

Regional Tensions and Risks Ahead

The renewed sanctions come months after a 12-day conflict with Israel that targeted Iranian nuclear facilities, raising questions about the state of its uranium stockpiles. Analysts warn that the snapback could push Iran closer to withdrawing from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, following a path once taken by North Korea. With tensions already high, Saturday’s sanctions are expected to deepen the standoff between Tehran and Western powers.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
BlogFeaturedWorld

Trump eyes land swaps as key to ending the Russia-Ukraine war.

by theparliamentnews.com
written by theparliamentnews.com

Trump’s Alaska Gambit: A Controversial Path to Peace

US President Donald Trump has thrown a fresh twist into the high-stakes Russia-Ukraine conflict, proposing that both nations “swap land” as part of a potential ceasefire deal. The move, which he plans to discuss with Russian President Vladimir Putin on August 15 in Alaska, comes with promises, risks, and fierce opposition on the ground.

The Core of Moscow’s Demands

For Moscow, the prize lies in cementing control over Donetsk and Luhansk — territories rich in coal, industry, and infrastructure. These regions have been at the heart of the war since 2014, and Russia shows no signs of relinquishing them. In fact, one of the Kremlin’s non-negotiables is keeping Ukraine out of NATO.

Kyiv’s Conditional Willingness

While Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has signaled a reluctant willingness to cede some territory, it comes with a catch — NATO membership and ironclad security guarantees. Without those, Kyiv says the deal is dead on arrival.

What the Proposal Could Mean on the Map

The plan floated after US special envoy Steve Witkoff’s Moscow visit suggests Kyiv might surrender the last parts of Donetsk under its control, freezing the front lines and halting the fighting. But this would also cement Russian control over areas seized in Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson, and Crimea.

Voices from the Ground in Ukraine

In Sloviansk, near the contested Donbas region, the mere idea of a US-backed land swap has stirred anxiety. Local journalist Mykhailo told CNN that the prospect feels “dark and surreal,” adding, “Many of my friends will have to leave.” The town, once seized by Russian proxies in 2014 and later reclaimed by Ukraine, remains on edge, with defensive trenches still in place.

The Ceasefire Stalemate

Trump earlier called for a 30-day unconditional ceasefire — something Kyiv agreed to in March, but Moscow rejected. Instead, Russia has intensified its attacks since Trump took office. In response, Trump has increased pressure through economic sanctions and by hiking tariffs on India, a major buyer of Russian oil, in an effort to weaken Moscow’s war chest.

High Stakes in Alaska

Trump has hinted at a follow-up meeting involving himself, Putin, and Zelensky, aiming to seal the deal in person. “There’ll be some land swapping going on,” he told reporters, suggesting the Alaska talks will serve as a critical temperature check on Russia’s willingness to negotiate.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
BlogFeaturedWorld

US Pushes for a “Swift End” to Ukraine War —But Without a Key Demand

by theparliamentnews.com
written by theparliamentnews.com

A Shift in Diplomacy at the UN

The geopolitical landscape surrounding the Ukraine conflict has taken an unexpected turn. In a move that has sent shockwaves through diplomatic circles, the United States is set to introduce a United Nations resolution advocating for a rapid conclusion to the war. However, in a notable departure from previous UN resolutions, this new proposal omits any mention of Ukraine’s territorial integrity—a fundamental point Kyiv and its allies have insisted upon since the war began three years ago.

This development signals a stark shift in Washington’s approach under the new US administration. With former President Donald Trump returning to the White House, a recalibration of alliances and diplomatic priorities appears to be underway, particularly concerning Russia.

Two Competing Resolutions

On Monday, Ukraine, backed by more than 50 nations, is expected to present a resolution before the UN General Assembly, reiterating the need for an immediate cessation of hostilities and demanding that Russian forces withdraw from Ukrainian territory. This follows the pattern of previous resolutions overwhelmingly supported by UN members.

However, in a surprising move, Washington has introduced an alternative resolution that takes a far more neutral stance. Rather than demanding a Russian withdrawal, it simply urges a “swift end to the conflict” and calls for a “lasting peace” between both nations.

A Diplomatic Dilemma for Europe

The US proposal presents a diplomatic challenge for European nations. The resolution needs nine votes in the 15-member Security Council to pass, without a veto from any of the five permanent members (US, UK, France, Russia, and China).

For European powers such as France and Britain, the situation is precarious. Supporting a resolution that does not affirm Ukraine’s sovereignty would contradict their previous positions. However, vetoing a US-backed resolution—especially when their leaders are scheduled for key meetings in Washington—could strain transatlantic relations.

This creates a difficult choice: do they stand firmly with Kyiv, or do they tread carefully to maintain alignment with Washington’s evolving stance?

Global Reactions and Strategic Calculations

The proposal has received mixed reactions. Russia has cautiously welcomed the US initiative, with its UN ambassador calling it “a good move” while suggesting that it should also address the deeper causes of the conflict. Meanwhile, many countries in the UN General Assembly—some weary of prolonged focus on Ukraine—may see the American resolution as a more pragmatic path forward.

At the same time, some Arab nations remain skeptical, recalling Kyiv’s reluctance to support their resolutions on Gaza. For European diplomats, these competing resolutions will serve as a test of their influence within the multilateral system, while Ukraine risks finding itself increasingly isolated if its position fails to gain sufficient backing.

The Broader Implications

This diplomatic maneuver signals a potential realignment in how the Ukraine war is addressed on the world stage. The US move reflects a willingness to redefine its role in the conflict, favoring negotiation over confrontation. Whether this new approach will lead to peace or deepen divisions remains to be seen.

As the votes are cast at the UN, the world will be watching—because beyond the halls of diplomacy, millions of lives hang in the balance.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
BlogFeaturedWorld

First Presidential Debate: Trump Scores Over Biden in Heated Exchange

by theparliamentnews.com
written by theparliamentnews.com

The first 2024 presidential debate between President Joe Biden and his Republican rival, Donald Trump, saw a heated exchange on several key issues. After-debate polls indicate Trump as the winner of the debate. Here’s why experts think that Trump trumped over Biden.

For 90 minutes on Thursday night, CNN hosted the first presidential debate between former Republican President Donald Trump, 78, and Democratic President Joe Biden, 81. The debate featured sharp exchanges on inflation, immigration, abortion rights, and foreign policy. In the televised debate, the candidates aimed to persuade voters ahead of the upcoming election on November 5.

Polls and Public Opinion

A CNN poll aired immediately after the debate showed a decisive tilt in favor of Trump, with 67% of viewers believing he won the debate, compared to 33% who thought Biden performed better. This was a significant shift from the final 2020 presidential debate, where 53% of viewers felt Biden won, compared to 39% who favored Trump. Many viewers expressed concerns over Biden’s coherence and ability to lead the country effectively.

Key Points from the Debate

The debate enforced strict speaking limits, prohibited notes, and took place without an audience to ensure no reactions. Despite these constraints, the candidates sparred vigorously on key topics:

  • Inflation: Trump criticized Biden’s handling of the economy, blaming him for rising inflation and high living costs. Biden defended his administration’s economic policies, citing job creation and recovery efforts.
  • Immigration: The debate saw fierce exchanges on immigration policies, with Trump advocating for stricter border controls while Biden emphasized a more humane approach to immigration reform.
  • Abortion Rights: Trump reiterated his pro-life stance, while Biden supported women’s right to choose, emphasizing the importance of protecting reproductive rights.
  • Foreign Policy: Both candidates clashed over foreign policy, with Trump criticizing Biden’s handling of international relations and military engagements. Biden, on the other hand, highlighted his efforts to rebuild alliances and promote global stability.

Media and Expert Reactions

The New York Times declared Trump the winner, with columnist Josh Barro stating, “Joe Biden failed at his key task: showing voters he’s still cut out for the presidency. In the first 20 minutes, he was especially disastrous: mumbling, at times incoherent, and seeming really, really old. Trump seemed more normal than usual — enough for a clear win.”

Michelle Goldberg, a columnist and contributor for The New York Times, commented, “Trump, God help us. He spouted a fire hose of preposterous lies, but Biden was too incoherent to capitalize on any of it. Biden looked ancient and sounded lost. There will now be a new chorus of cries for him to drop out, and I’ll be joining it.”

On X (formerly Twitter), observers noted Trump’s strong performance and thorough answers, contrasting with Biden’s perceived confusion during the debate. Alyssa Farah Griffin, a CNN political commentator, wrote, “CNN Flash poll: 57% of viewers of tonight’s debate have NO confidence in Biden’s ability to lead the country. Stunning number from voters who witnessed his performance with their own eyes.”

Former CNN commentator Chris Cillizza added, “Look. This debate was a total and complete disaster for Biden. He looked old. His answers trailed off repeatedly. He was hard to understand. He would stop mid-sentence and move on to something else. I NEVER thought he would be this bad. Stunning. Truly.”

Biden Camp’s Defense

Biden’s team countered claims that he lost the debate, with Vice President Kamala Harris telling CNN, “It was a slow start but a strong finish,” reported Fox News. First Lady Jill Biden praised the president on stage after the debate, saying, “Joe, you did such a good job! You answered every question and knew all the facts.”

Several Democratic Party leaders, however, expressed deep concern over Biden’s performance in the debate. Jay Surdukowski, an attorney and Democratic activist from New Hampshire, told Politico, “Biden is toast – calling it now.”

Conclusion

Though this is the first of the presidential debates and Biden has chances of springing back, the results for now stand at Trump: 1 and Biden: 0. As the election season progresses, the upcoming debates will be crucial in shaping voter opinions and determining the ultimate victor in November.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Our News Portal

We provide accurate, balanced, and impartial coverage of national and international affairs, focusing on the activities and developments within the parliament and its surrounding political landscape. We aim to foster informed public discourse and promote transparency in governance through our news articles, features, and opinion pieces.

  • New Delhi
  • Phone: (+91) 7588-772545
  • Email: theparliamentnew23@gmail.com
  • Support: tpnews@theparliamentnews.com

About Links

Useful Links

Newsletter

Laest News

US Expands Naval Presence Amid Rising Tensions With Iran
Lok Sabha Passes Industrial Relations Code Amendment Bill, 2026
Government Releases New CPI Series; January Inflation at 2.75%
New Guidelines Issued for Vande Mataram at Official Functions

@2023 – All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by The Parliament News

Facebook Twitter Instagram Linkedin Youtube Email
Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
-
00:00
00:00

Queue

Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00